Again your concern seems more to do with Trump than the Kurds.... just sayin

How about not abdicating our position to foreign influence? How about supporting those who've helped us in a shared interest fighting ISIS? How about showing that we are not ones to symbolically abandon our allies, regardless of whether it's happened before?

There are very valid reasons to be there respective to national interests. Is the Right naive enough to believe that we helped the Kurds out of the goodness of our hearts? That we're there for no other reason than anyone else? We are there also to protect ourselves by assisting others who would bring the fight to our shores, to lend confidence to others in the future who would do the same.

This is incredibly myopic on Trump's part. Further, he gave a mandate to them. Was there any actual efforts of diplomacy setting deadlines? Discussing conditions? Contingencies? Or was this just the usual Trump statement, then he does nothing, and if they don't do what he says, he pulls out? That seems to be his style of governance: make demands of others, do nothing, then abandon them.

It´s always funny to see you come up with bad arguments. Also, no one cares if you critique Trump, it just gets old when it comes from the "orange man bad" reasoning instead of actual valid reasons.

Where have I defended Trump? Is this the part where you make stuff up to make yourself feel less basic? Just asking where you've been?

Nothing to do with Trump.... everything to do with your hatred being the only reason you know the Kurds exist.... You're a bit late maybe that's why you're so basic?

Not as sad as your faux 1 week old concern of the Kurds.

It always makes me laugh that "orange man bad" NPCs always turn up late to the party on policy...

Now the left care about the Kurds..... That's funny.

"Those poor kurds...." *picks up kurd as an axe to grind against bad orange man*