After reading your review, I have come to a determination; I will, most likely, be buying and playing this game.

Throughout reading the review, I found myself more and more at odds with your sectional conclusions.

You describe, piece by piece, a game that sounds amazing. Especially when compared to the games that have been released, in this genre and really in all genres, in recent years (please note the use of the 's' in 'years'). Yet, you conclude, piece by piece, that this game is awful.

Your writing is clearly not unbiased. I won't pretend to know why, but I feel safe in knowing should this have been a court of law, this point would be as easily argued, or in this case simply conveyed, as a judge explaining to a jury pool in a number of ways what would constitute beyond a reasonable doubt.

I offer you a conclusion of my own:

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I've ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response was there anything that could even be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul!"