Nothing new about this, but consider isnt this breaking contract with sony?

Now thats what i wanna know

new gen of socom 2 and 3

what happen to cod that was announce that every 2 year it will release a game (that what the Devs said when it was shown the codww2) and it hasnt even been a year yet and another one being release 1 year later

who won the E3?

F*** the Who won, its base on who is a gamer.

those that games, ARE the WINNER

nintendo doesnt fight to get first place

sony, microsoft and bethesda try to hard to get first play which is annoying in my point of view (mostnly bethesda that kind of annoying cause of all that F*** and B****ing words that kill the vibes)

wanna see Arma4

does it matter which side win?

its the company that try to make a good game and everyone get hype over it.

at the end: COD is just a mimic of other games that are better, BF is its own game but its the company that force pay to win.

So the overall i say that both company lose cause they have more cons then pros

to say it was already dead to begin with

really? what about the loading screen from destiny (it took 3min to load into gameplay), what about the useless ships, what about the spawn, what about the saying it suppose to be open world but its only 16 player per world?

so.........is it borrow or is it copyrights borrow?

it only does every useless things