To GS staffs, game publishers, and fellow gamers; This could become one of the all time highest participating forums which shows how concern we are about DLC matter. After skimming through all of the pages so far, I could hardly find anyone supporting business practice concerning DLC. * New released games with DLC feature = crippled games. PRO: get your hand on them first. CON: you may end up paying up to $100 or more for 1 game+all of its DLC. * Post released games = (usually) the complete edition games. PRO: you can save up to 80% or more and enjoy the most comprehensive version of the games. CON: It may take year(s) to get to this rate. Why DLC is WRONG considering it could be included in the disc! It is the waste of time (for complexity), hard drive space, money (to purchase DLC and possibly another HDD). It will be more complicate to transfer DLC from console to console or to next generation console(if you can). It obviously doesn't comply with Go Green campaign. You can protest business practice concerning DLC by making sure that the game you're about to buy does NOT have DLC. Suggesting solutions: DLC should ONLY exist for righteous reason (e.g. not to unlock content on the disc but brand new content to celebrate the success of the game or to thanks for consumer support).DLC should be available for free to fix issue, enhance gaming experience (gamer should not be charged for content that's supposed to be in the game), or promote the sale of the game. If there should be any charge for DLC, it should be one time small fee (15% of game cost maximum) for complete unlimited (if possible) online access and all of its extra content(s). More DLC creation would promote the game sale and the mentioned fee.