GRINDCORE!!

8/10

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQDMXbda_6k&feature=related

3/10 definitely not my kind of music

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guJdO6vAufc

hyrueprince11

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxdKdTt729E

I wanna be the guy. Its free to play so everyone should download it.

this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kk9oa_PiXAk

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

I will defiantly get the console version in the new engine with the next gen lighting, not the old one on PC

ChubbyGuy40

How is it next-gen lighting when they were both created this gen :|

Why not get the far superior and far definitive version on PC? You don't need a beast computer to run it. Why settle for the inferior and intentionally crippled version?

they are fake, its using the original nanosuit ( as you can see by the red on his arms), whilst crysis on consoles is said to use nanosuit 2.0. Also the resolution of the images are at 1080p or 1050p.

hooeyberg

Pretty sure they aren't. Look at the video footage. It has the horrible armor mode from Crysis 2.

Those pictures are fake. The nanosuit in the pics is the original suit not nanosuit 2.0 with that crap armour mode which will be in the actual console release

they are fake, its using the original nanosuit ( as you can see by the red on his arms), whilst crysis on consoles is said to use nanosuit 2.0. Also the resolution of the images are at 1080p or 1050p.

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="DangerousLiquid"]

Anyone who thinks BF3 will be more fun than MW3 has to be kidding themselves, or try to be unique.

DangerousLiquid

Fun is a matter of opinion. If you like all of your enemies to be right in front of you every 10 seconds and easily killing them with a grenade launcher, play MW3. If you prefer a little variety with your gameplay and some tactics Battlefield is the way to go.

Both can be fun, it's just that after 5 iterations of the same fun, some people may want something a bit different.

True, it's subjective.

This whole thing reminds me of the Crysis vs Halo 3 fight in 2007.

Crysis had superior technique and graphics. Halo 3 was way more fun to play.

Battlefield 3 looks sweeter with more advanced technology poured into it, but we all know which one will be more entertaining to play, it's not even a question...

If its not even a question how come i prefered crysis to halo 3 and prefer battlefield to cod?

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="nutcrackr"]

Gameplay vid is up

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGyswpn6xzQ

Elann2008

Looks exactly like a Homefront rip-off. Really sad when such a high-budget game has only slightly better visuals than Battlefield 2. It can't even match Bad Company 1's visuals.

they've already removed it, and to think it was an official video...BF3's caspian border trailer blew it out of the water

There's always this on PC
http://www.moddb.com/mods/star-wars-mod-galactic-warfare

[QUOTE="Kinthalis"]

The game is technically impressive in that there's literraly THOUSANDS of troops on the field all having these little battles with each other. This is a lot more impressive, TEHCNICALLY, than anything on Crysis 2.

But purely from a visual quality, graphics on an FPS like Crysis 2 are a lot better.

They should be. Crysis 2 isn't rendering whole armies, just a few dozen mobs tops.

I don't think a video card capable of rendering tens of thousands of troops at the quality of Crysis 2 exists yet.

jhcho2

The thread title is about graphics king, not army king. Way to take something out of context and pass it off as being within context. And you know why the video is in slow motion? Because if it wasn't, the framerate drop will be noticeable. Shogun 2 isn't taxing on the GPU. It's taxing on CPU, rendering independant movements of hundreds of soldiers. If you simply play around with the graphic setting, you'll notice that lower quality of anything doesn't do much (or as much as you'd hope) to improve the framerate, implying again that the GPU isn't likely the bottleneck. Hence, we shouldn't be talking about graphics king when the CPU is more of a concern than the GPU.

you realise you need a high fps to slow something down and keep it smooth dont you?