Battlefield is intense. Cod is more arcade-y, more casual.

In my opinion, Battlefield is the better game. Buildings get damaged, tanks and aircraft all buzz around you, gunshot sounds are realistic; if you have a really good pc or next gen console, Battlefield WILL take advantage of it.

I love battlefield. But I like COD for zombies.

Absolutely. GTA V did that, and I think that was brilliant. Otherwise, you noticed when games sacrifice one thing for another. Look at Battlefield 4. The story was awful, but you buy it for the multiplayer.

I really like the second one. I'm glad I didn't give too much away there :) buy it if you can!

GTA V is alot of fun, but most of the fun is to be had online. Since Rockstar decided to skip PC, i'm stuck paying 50+ a year for xbox live. Since you've waited this long, I would keep waiting until a pc release date is announced.

But if your not interested in multiplayer, GTA V is awesome even on consoles.

This is a forum where I b*tch about the 3rd game, so if you don't like that here's your warning :)

WARNING SPOILERS ARE INVOLVED!

I feel like I have to say something here, because I am just amazed at how the first 2 games were incredible, and F.3.A.R. was just total garbage. Hear me out here:

F.E.A.R. had a few good jump scares, but it's dark settings and spooky scenery are what made is such a great game. The story was incredible; Alma's your character's mother, and Paxton your brother? That's insane!! The story development and climax was fantastic. And not to mention how much fun it was to kill AI in slow motion and how far ahead it was of its time.

F.E.A.R. 2, in my opinion, was better. I loved the exploring for intel, body armor, health kits (and not STUPID health generation): The firefighting was fun, the voice cast was excellent, and the story was still mind blowing. Alma's lust for Michael Beckett was a really cool concept I thought. And the jump scares were just...sick. They happened at parts you didn't expect them to happen, and when you did expect them, the dev team managed to still surprise you and make you sheet your pants. I thought it was scarier then the first one. I hated it so much I loved it.

F.3.A.R....what in the world happened??? I feel like they killed what was such a fantastic series. What was WB thinking taking Monolith off the project? The constant achievements on the bottom left were mood killers (OMG you hid behind cover!? 1000 POINTS!!!), there was no real reason for exploration (no intel, no health kits or body armor, no nothing!) The story was awful. Nothing new, no surprises, and the ending was a disgrace. "it wont be so easy to kill me this time brother!" (5 seconds later, you kill him. No button sequences involved, just a cut scene). But that's not it. Why did Alma and Paxton, who are evil spirits, both die out just like that? And by the way, what was up with the cutscene quality? The audio and video were terrible! And i'm running a beast of a PC. It didn't feel like a F.E.A.R. game to me. And they killed Michael Beckett? WHY DID THEY KILL MICHAEL BECKETT?? And in the worst way possible. Again, through a bad cutscene, in the most anti climatic way possible.

They should have focused the game on stopping Alma's pregnancy, then reintroduced Paxton Fettel at the end, setting it up for a F.E.A.R. 4. The execution on F.3.A.R.'s story was just bad.

What do you all think? Thanks for letting me vent and hearing me out. You guys know what it feels like to love something, then it having a totally disappointing ending. Kinda like how Dexter ended.