dropthepj's forum posts

  • 38 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Avatar image for dropthepj
dropthepj

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 dropthepj
Member since 2016 • 41 Posts

@bforrester420 said:
@Wickerman777 said:
@bforrester420 said:

You're an idiot. California is the 6th largest economy on the planet and is responsible for 14% of the U.S. GDP. It's our 3rd largest producer of petroleum (tied with Alaska), the globe's leader in tech innovation, and the nation's largest agricultural producer.

They're also one of the most indebted states in the country. I'm willing to lose it if it means no more idiots in the Whitehouse obsessing over putting dudes in wigs in the ladies room while our jobs get shipped overseas.

And btw, when you say tech I think of physical products like phones, TVs, etc., not code. No way California is up there with Japan when it comes to actual tech.

Apple, Intel, ******, Western Digital, Broadcom, Cisco, EVGA, Fitbit, Gateway, GoPro, HP....all tech hardware companies, to name a few, headquartered in California. When you factor in the phama, bio tech, and software...without which hardware is useless...companies based in California...

You forgot a huge one, Nvidia. They are developing a cloud computing platform that will be far beyond anything else in the world. Google, also stationed in CA, is developing a quantum computer that will beat every computer in the world. Not to mention Tesla, Space X and Solar City. And Tesla has no competitors as of yet. California is where innovation comes from.

Avatar image for dropthepj
dropthepj

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 dropthepj
Member since 2016 • 41 Posts

Sonic The Hedgehog on the Sega Genesis.

Avatar image for dropthepj
dropthepj

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 dropthepj
Member since 2016 • 41 Posts

@N30F3N1X said:

No, you are the one who's biased. You're arguing without even making one attempt at giving a source or context. You're full of shit.

I'm not full of shit. Here are your sources.

Avatar image for dropthepj
dropthepj

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 dropthepj
Member since 2016 • 41 Posts

I mean, this makes complete sense. I am not surprised.

Avatar image for dropthepj
dropthepj

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By dropthepj
Member since 2016 • 41 Posts

@N30F3N1X said:

What difference precisely? Hillary outright called every Trump supporter hopeless and used every dishonest trick she had in her bag to make him and his supporters look bad, and still failed to come out on top because of all the shady shit she's involved in. The only people who supported her are the very ones who want to be divisive and ignored all of her shenanigans because they are just as dishonest as she is and they didn't care that they were supporting one of the slimiest candidates in the history of ever. How f*cking blind can you be to say Trump's the only one who was divisive? Where have you lived in the duration of Obama's second term?

No, you are what's wrong with society. How your minority friends feel is, and should be, irrelevant, as the facts (you know, reality, that thing the leftists don't like basing their opinion on) say that they have never been safer as violent crimes are decreasing on a yearly basis and the amount of racially or sexually motivated hate crimes have been largely constant throughout the last 5 years (20112012201320142015). Worse - how your minority friends feel is your fault. This idea that "someone" out there is out to get everyone who isn't white is complete and utter bullshit that only the left likes to foster because it is completely unsubstantiated and it nets them support based on a completely dishonest and false narrative.

Get your head out of your ass. You're the one who's not paying attention.

Wow, you are putting words in my mouth left and right. You are obviously biased. It was his message and the things he has said (Trump even deliberately held a rally where a Hispanic was killed in a hate crime). Calling people hopeless isn't cool, but is it absolutely nothing compared to:

- Calling black casino workers "lazy"

- Calling supporters who beat up a homeless latino "passionate"

- His real estate company was sued by the Justice Department multiple times for not renting to black people

- His campaign photoshopped the image of a white model black.

- He was endorsed by the KKK

- He refused to condemn violence against Muslims and African Americans committed by his supporters

- 80% of supporters claim to have no problem with racist comments

- He believes that Mexicans are rapists by default

- He wants to racially profile to prevent "criminality"

- And much, much mroe

Like I said, you aren't paying attention.

Avatar image for dropthepj
dropthepj

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By dropthepj
Member since 2016 • 41 Posts

@N30F3N1X said:
@dropthepj said:

Tyranny? Ha. It is the hateful behavior enabled by the message of the Trump campaign that is truly tyrannical. The racist xenophobes that were in hiding are now less afraid to oppress. It has made our country more divided. Neither candidate would "fix" this issue, but this isn't democracy. If the vote of the people actually chose our next President, people wouldn't be as outraged as they are now.

This^, is a load of bullshit.

Both sides are full of hateful behavior, except the hateful left actually wants to censor everyone who doesn't agree with its every view, even the most outlandish ones. That is half the reason why Trump got so many votes. Racist xenophobes are an extremely minute amount of people and the very fact that the left is focusing on them instead of cleaning up its own bullshit which it even refuses to acknowledge speaks volumes about how detached they are from the world they live in.

It wasn't Trump's campaign that made your country more divided. It was the left with its focus on petty inconsequential problems and its desire to label anyone who disagrees with it as social unacceptable. Trump was just the people's answer to it. If this isn't a huge wake up call for the left I don't know what is - people voted for a person who showed himself to be a moron loudmouth and who had one of the worst campaign runs in the history of the US just to give the left the middle finger for its current state of politics.

If you couldn't see the difference between the campaigns, then you are what's wrong with society. It's not bullshit. It's what actually happened. My minority friends are more fearful than ever. It's not even about the fact that Trump won the Presidency. It's about what happened along the way. If you don't know what I'm talking about, then you simply haven't been paying attention.

Avatar image for dropthepj
dropthepj

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 dropthepj
Member since 2016 • 41 Posts

@N30F3N1X said:
@dropthepj said:
@n64dd said:
@dave123321 said:

@n64dd: I don't see the math working out

Well, learn to math :P

If the electoral college kept up with the population changes over the last several decades, California would have over 100 electors. The system isn't proportionate to the population densities of each state, which is why the math is severely flawed. It's a bad system.

It's not flawed. That's part of the reason why it's in place - to avoid the tyranny of the majority.

Tyranny? Ha. It is the hateful behavior enabled by the message of the Trump campaign that is truly tyrannical. The racist xenophobes that were in hiding are now less afraid to oppress. It has made our country more divided. Neither candidate would "fix" this issue, but this isn't democracy. If the vote of the people actually chose our next President, people wouldn't be as outraged as they are now.

Avatar image for dropthepj
dropthepj

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 dropthepj
Member since 2016 • 41 Posts

@n64dd said:
@dave123321 said:

@n64dd: I don't see the math working out

Well, learn to math :P

If the electoral college kept up with the population changes over the last several decades, California would have over 100 electors. The system isn't proportionate to the population densities of each state, which is why the math is severely flawed. It's a bad system.

Avatar image for dropthepj
dropthepj

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 dropthepj
Member since 2016 • 41 Posts

@n64dd said:

So .004 percent of the US population. Who cares?

I am one of those votes that didn't count. I care.

  • 38 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4