I have a friend at work who likes to play video games with his wife on his 360. He's 32 and is not a big gamer, but likes to game with his wife, and his Wii is more for his kids. He recently bought Sacred 2: Fallen Angel, and agreed with me that this game was an atrocity. His wife didn't even like it.

I told him I'd do him a favor before tuesday and get a good game reccommendation for him. I don't have a significant other, and probably wouldn't be playing too many games with her if I did, so I drew a blank when I though about coming up with a good co-op title for the 360.

Are there any games that someone could reccommend for these two? Something RPG-ish is generally what they're looking for here.

Both.

I think the complaint is that being openly gay means an automatic discharge from the military, usually a dishonorable one. Hope that clarifies things for you.xaos

Nope. No disharge. Plenty of openly gay people in the military as it stands.

Those groups that post in OT about facebook...

They can't have an adams apple.

Yeah, that's about it. I'm not shallow.

I find it funny that you post this...

I actually prefer BFBC2 over MW2, which I've been playing all the way up to BFBC 2's release. I had been playing for 2 days, and a friend of mine wants to play MW2 because he'd never played online. So he plays and goes 0-10. Then I take over and get him to 12 -10. Then I play another game, couldnt stand watching him destroy my K/D ratio, and go 19 - 6 after he died 4 times.

I love BFBC2 because of the unlocks and the vehicles / environment. It's also much more fun for sniping. Not everyone who prefers BFBC2 is terrible at MW2, I just find that it's a more enjoyable experience. MW2 is an arcade shooter, where BFBC2 isn't so much. They are different games in a sense, you can't compare the two on exactly the same level.

Average Canadian is in better shape and more athletic then the average American
We got more capable athletes per capita then the U.S, if we were to have 300 million people we would have more gold medalist contenders in the olympics and as a result more medals.

Should I say more?

XileLord

"If" is a good word to use here... More people in shape per capita would have nothing to do with Olympic medal contenders, only peoples' will to partake in the olympics would effect that outcome. More people in shape DOES NOT mean more olympians. That's like saying if Sparta had doubled it's population, it would have doubled it's Army... how would you know that women (who were non-combatants) didn't make up 75% of that population that was doubled? Then tell me, how could you be certain that with a population of 300 million you would have significantly more Olympians?

Please do say more.:)

You have absolutely 0 arguments to support your hypothesis. Also if this is true how did we win more gold medals than you? Sure you won more total, all that means is that you are average at alot of things.

iloverikku11

More medals = more times we placed in an event. Sure, Canada may have gotten more gold medals than us, but they are way behind in other events. Better to be average at many things than superb at a few.

Better to be a Jack of all trades than a master of (few).

It depends on the drug. Cocaine is awful, as well as meth and pills. Any addictive substance will cause someone to go to extremes (commiting criminal acts) to obtain their drugs. I think drug users who use drugs like marijuana and halleucinogens aren't bad people, they just make bad choices.

What is the point of this thread? It's as useless as this post. Lol. th3warr1or

Yeah, pretty much. Same with this post too.