[QUOTE="johnnyv2003"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="johnnyv2003"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"] Yes they are and to quote one Tony the Tiger...
"It's Grrrrrrrrrrrreat!"
The Republican Party is the 65 and older party. Their ranks are withering and dying while the Democrats are the party of 64 and under.
With the number of people mobilized for the Democratic party the Republicans don't have the numbers anymore. And the way they're dropping off it will get worse as time goes on.
We live in a glorious new age.
Jaysonguy
I love how you talked about bigotry and generalizing homosexuals in a previous post. Yet you don't mind applying those same ideas to people who fall under a political affiliation you disagree with.
We don't live in a new age, we're just going around the same cycle we've been going in before.
Nothing I said is bigoted at all
The Republican party is the party of 65 and older. That means there is no new blood to the ranks and the current blood will not be here for many more elections.
The youth of America has shown itself to be overwhelmingly in support of Democratic party. They also (unlike the 65 and older) have a chance to create more Democrats.
there are plenty of young republicans out there. I'll give it to you that the younger demographic wasn't represented in the presidential election by the republicans, but that doesn't equal to the norm.
So, having an entire thought about a political affiliation based on the premises of one election is generalization.
Yes there are plenty of them, they just represent the minority right now.
It's not like I'm against old people. I love old people, they're terrific and I hope to be one someday.
That being said the Democrats are the party of youth with a much larger base of that youth vote.
not likely after I'm done with you, ;)
Log in to comment