bulb_or_parrot's forum posts

Avatar image for bulb_or_parrot
bulb_or_parrot

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 bulb_or_parrot
Member since 2007 • 73 Posts

Dreams-Visions, Subrosian, cakeorrdeath, and of course Casey WegnerLo_Rising

Ah, god amongst men, each and every one. CaseyWegner once banned a person from the internet, he banned him TOO WELL, however, for on any computer that user could no longer access *any* website, the first (and possibly last) ban of its kind. It's said that even now no admin alive knows how to undo such a powerful ban - so strong was the will behind the banning.

-

Some say Subrosian cursed his own name, and that he is no longer human. According to legend a great server known only as "the eye in the storm" runs a search program across a thousand host machines - a program writ by daemon claws that haints every corner of the internet. Every whisper of his dread name is heard, every scratching of the letters across keys draws his ear. Even now the great serpeant listens, and watches, and waits. Can you hear it? Can you?

-

Subrosian and CaseyWegner are fated to do battle in the end days of System Wars - Casey for PC, and Subrosian for the yet-unborn unified gaming platform.

Avatar image for bulb_or_parrot
bulb_or_parrot

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 bulb_or_parrot
Member since 2007 • 73 Posts
I don't get why they put Dragon Quest on the DS, but we get the simpler DQ: Swords on the Wii. Like, the Wii is more powerful than the PS2, so why can't we have a title as complex as Final Fantasy X on the Wii? Third parties are just sucking right now.

I agree though, seeing My Sims, Soul Caliber Legends, and Umbrella Chronicles, I kind of go - where thecomplex new stuff? Nintendo makes MP3, and you third parties make... uhh... No More Heroes and not much else? Sad...
Avatar image for bulb_or_parrot
bulb_or_parrot

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 bulb_or_parrot
Member since 2007 • 73 Posts
[QUOTE="ag1052"][QUOTE="x_water"]

smash bros, mario galexy, MPC, BWII, my sims and others.

its has like 512 mb mem i think

dragonball3900

My sims???

Have an open mind, could be the best game on Wii for all we know.

I would add Fire Emblem to that list.



I doubt that, the third parties have yet to show they can do it better than Nintendo. It's pretty hard to say a "twist on an ancient franchise" is really going to be more fun than a Nintedo game. I mean, honestly, Animal Crossing Wii? Awesome. My Sims? Get out of here!
Avatar image for bulb_or_parrot
bulb_or_parrot

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 bulb_or_parrot
Member since 2007 • 73 Posts

1. Rechargeable batteries are cheap, and work great. Everyone I know with a Wii uses them, and they've never had any problems. The charger is the most expensive part, since the batteries are so cheap, you can have a couple charged at all times, ready to go for those week-long gaming fests.

2. Super Paper Mario and Twilight Princess. I'm not into sports games (other than Wii Sports) so I can't recommend Tiger Woods.

Avatar image for bulb_or_parrot
bulb_or_parrot

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 bulb_or_parrot
Member since 2007 • 73 Posts
[QUOTE="Dencore"][QUOTE="subrosian"]

Dencore's argument is an absolute rambling mess based on cherry-picking games that failed to say "see - look - these games can't be harming the Wii's library, they're not succeding".

Yet look at the eight most successful games on the Wii - Wii Play, Wii Sports, Twilight Princess, Mario Party 8, Warioware, Super Paper Mario, Red Steel, and Raving Rabbids... does that really paint a hardcore library to you?

What's hardcore? The topic here is that THIRD PARTIES are making most of their profit from traditional games and not casual games.

'm not putting a value judgement on it - but the Wii's library is predominantly casual / non-traditional titles, with a few core titles succeding because of the support from longtime Nintendo fans. It's also a system absolutely dominated by first party titles.

Is that a joke or something? I posted that hte traditional third party games are outselling the casual third party games. Stop making stuff up.

Dencore's hate-filled rant is nothing more than cherry-picked "facts" that leave out any numbers which contradict him. Basically, he's pointed at other system said "see, they have bad games too, and hardcore titles fail! hahahah!" and yet on the Xbox 360 the vast majority of the million-sellers have been hardcore titles, whereas on the Wii these titles represent a minority.

Umm how many of those are "third party" one third party on there is traditional while one is "casual".

Dencore is wrong in saying that hardcore gamers are not the focus of anyone - obviously Microsoft's third parties are keen to cater to them, and he's wrong in simply using negative, deceptive facts to try and support some personal bias regarding the Wii. Frankly, I'm extremely dissapointed in the Nintendo fans who buy into his brand of argument.


Worse, the TC has no respect for the people who respond to his posts, I see no point in debating further, not because Dencore is correct, but because his eyes are completely closed to a viewpoint beyond his own, and he lashes out with hatred towards anyone who wants a calm discussion. When the TC wants to talk respectfully, and can summarize the points he's trying to get across, rather than pointing at some argument and saying "I'm 100% correct, and you're a moron for questioning me" - I'm but a PM away.

subrosian

You just summarized the most patheitc argument. You claimed the third party casual games are outselling the core games when they aren't. Learn to read.



Third party games aren't selling as well on the Wii period Dencore, learn to think before you spew hatred at me.

"It's also a system absolutely dominated by first party titles."

Did you read that, and understand why it makes your "third party failure based" arguement invalid? Nintendo publishes the majority of the best-selling games on their system, Microsoft and Sony don't.

"Worse, the TC has no respect for the people who respond to his posts, I see no point in debating further, not because Dencore is correct, but because his eyes are completely closed to a viewpoint beyond his own, and he lashes out with hatred towards anyone who wants a calm discussion."

Did you read that before you felt the need to spew hate-filled words at me? Or did you cherry-pick my post too?

When the TC wants to talk respectfully, and can summarize the points he's trying to get across, rather than pointing at some argument and saying "I'm 100% correct, and you're a moron for questioning me" - I'm but a PM away.


And it's true, I'm happy to discuss things calmly in a PM if you have a problem with my point of view. Ask anyone who's PMed me, I'm always happy to reply, and I'm always respectful in my discussion with fellow gamers, there's no need for hatred.

yet on the Xbox 360 the vast majority of the million-sellers have been hardcore titles, whereas on the Wii these titles represent a minority.

Which is something you cannot disprove. The 360 is a hardcore-focused system, so obviously *someone* is focusing on the system - the majority of the games on the system are hardcore, and the third parties there are focused on hardcore titles. The audience that buys the Wii has a different taste in games than the audience that buys an Xbox 360.

But yes Dencore, you blast anyone who uses the big picture to prove you wrong, you insult anyone who replies, and you dismiss arguments that contradict your own narrow point-of-view. I'm done here man, your disrespect towards your fellow gamer is absolutely unacceptable. If you really care about someone's opinion other than your own, feel free to talk to me in private.

And Nintendo fans who support this, I'm dissapointed - I thought you could champion your point of view with some manners.



I agree, you were absolutely owned here Dencore. Creating a post and calling it "official ownage" and then demanding a sticky for your own biased viewpoint is disgustingly arrogant. I'm bothered by your need to berate people. Some people like cheeseburgers, some people like chicken sandwiches - some people like hardcore gaming, some like casual gaming, but there's no need to come at people with hate-filled rants.

Subrosian's "good-bye Nintendo" - something you left GS for a period over, was out of absolute love for gaming, but all I see here is a poster cackling over failed hardcore titles, ignoring the big picture, and taking an extremely narrow view of the whole, then dismissing the big picture because it does not support his bias.
Avatar image for bulb_or_parrot
bulb_or_parrot

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 bulb_or_parrot
Member since 2007 • 73 Posts
I'm going to bet that Killzone 2 will get AAA! GOTY! It's so awesome looking. Plus, I like cheeseburgers!
Avatar image for bulb_or_parrot
bulb_or_parrot

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 bulb_or_parrot
Member since 2007 • 73 Posts
[QUOTE="bulb_or_parrot"][QUOTE="Silenthps"]its not making them the focus of the market, its adding them to the market.grapefruit21


I am part of a demographic called "true cheeseburger lovers" - one of requirements is that the establishment we buy cheeseburgers from *only* offer beef cheeseburgers. If they offer so called "veggie cheeseburgers" then they have dishonored the mighty cheeseburger, and must be punished. Thus, Wendy's > Burger King.

Therefore, vegetarians may *never* be added to the true cheeseburger demographic.

What does this have to do with the Wii? Absolutely nothing - because Reggie Fil-Aimee has already stated that the Wii is focused on new gamers (aka non-traditional gamers) and made it clear that they're building their titles for "everyone" - which comes at the cost of supporting a niche, such as the "pure cheeseburger eaters".

You act like all core games fall into one genre. Some games are more accessible then others due to their genre, but just because they are accessible doesn't make them core. P.S. I am assuming you refer to cheeseburgers as hardcore and not a specific genre.



Oh no, cheeseburger lovers can be pretty divided, you should hear the fights we had over the recent trends like bacon burgers, southwest burgers, and steakburgers. But, in general, we agree that we love cheeseburgers.

It's kind of hard to relate that analogy to videogames sometimes. Actually, I don't know anymore, I'm hungry, I think I'll go get me one of those cheeseburgers I've been babbling about. Either way, I like the videogames I like, my taste isn't about putting a label on things - I just know that there are more games on the other consoles I like right now than on the Wii - I hope that changes, but if it doesn't, well, that's life. It's all about the cheesebur... I mean videogames.
Avatar image for bulb_or_parrot
bulb_or_parrot

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 bulb_or_parrot
Member since 2007 • 73 Posts
its not making them the focus of the market, its adding them to the market.Silenthps


I am part of a demographic called "true cheeseburger lovers" - one of requirements is that the establishment we buy cheeseburgers from *only* offer beef cheeseburgers. If they offer so called "veggie cheeseburgers" then they have dishonored the mighty cheeseburger, and must be punished. Thus, Wendy's > Burger King.

Therefore, vegetarians may *never* be added to the true cheeseburger demographic.

What does this have to do with the Wii? Absolutely nothing - because Reggie Fil-Aimee has already stated that the Wii is focused on new gamers (aka non-traditional gamers) and made it clear that they're building their titles for "everyone" - which comes at the cost of supporting a niche, such as the "pure cheeseburger eaters".
Avatar image for bulb_or_parrot
bulb_or_parrot

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 bulb_or_parrot
Member since 2007 • 73 Posts
You fail to answer the question - "how does this benefit a gamer who likes traditional games?" It doesn't help that the market research has shown Nintendo is only shifting the demographics, not expanding them. Further, PC gaming has become increasingly *less* expensive every generation, while the Wii is *more* expensive than the Gamecube, despite offering few improvements in graphics or sound hardware...

The Wii has only "saved" gaming if you like inexpensive titles like Wii Fitness... the gaming market for expensive traditional titles would have been better off if it had never come along. Plus, your whole arguement revolves around a 360 / PS3 failure, despite combined sales of these systems being higher than the Wii sales, almost *in spite* of their high prices.