You guys really should have included a higher Ghz AMD x2 processor and higher Ghz Core 2 duo like the 8400/8500/8600 and the Q6600. the graph gives the illusion that extreme processors offer substantially better performance when in reality all of the none extreme processors are budget processors(excluding the P4 which is just really really old). But I suppose that's the reason Intel only gives you guys the most expensive processors possible for review purposes knowing that you won't spend the money to offer a fair comparison.

Come on guys, you could have at least made some effort in the comparison shots, first off you use low res smeared halo 1/2 screen sorts, the graphics aren't great but there not blurry like your shots would have us believe. Also the context is completely different between shots, for the characters you make comparisons from vastly different angles and brightness . in the outdoor/indoor shots you make no attempt to find environments that are similar. Overall this entire article needs to be redone. put a little effort in next time.