@Bread_or_Decide: Oh, I see. You're a troll or completely ignorant of the software deveolpment process. Do you see any other art/entertainment medium doing anything that's different besides a few exceptions? You're just being elitist trash.

@Bread_or_Decide: Or maybe they are cheaper to produce, so stuidos with less money make them. JoBlow got plenty of money to develop The Witness after Braid.

I have more than enough trouble trying to beat MY Steam games...

@donjuancorleone: http://www.gamespot.com/articles/bloodborne-the-old-hunters-everything-you-need-to-/1100-6432520/

Was thinking about getting this during winter break, but without multiplayer, I'm going to wait.

Looks like a good portion of people, including myself, are having problems with MCC MM still.

6 for it's current state is fair. Owning the game and only wanting to play the multiplayer makes me want to give it a 1, but once it gets to working, a 7 would probably be fair for a bunch of ports and a remake of a 10 year old game.

Gamers like tech. Future tech is especially appealing, therefore, you get gamers that like games with future tech. WWII is one setting, that's why it got old. The future has limitless settings.

Edmund McMillen is the reason I'm sure I want to make games.

I never had problems with this service (unlike Origin and Uplay). Although, maybe it's because I already had a 360 and was used to the interface. I think it's a good move for them to not try to compete with Steam and probably just use its service for its own development studios.