@PimpMasterFong COD4 cannot be compared to Bioshock. COD is awesome, but too short. And the online is very entertaining and competitive. Yet, Bioshock surpasses COD4. Bioshock's story, gameplay, graphics, innovative fighting (EVE, ADAM, Plasmids), soundtrack and environment really deserve a 10. COD series look always the same, and that is why World at War was nut such a success. We'll have to wait for Modern Warfare to see if COD series can live up to compete against all the great wave of shooters that are coming out this year: MAG, Killzone 2, Bioshock 2
I think that Gamespot was paid to make this review, Microsoft wanted to get their customers back. After Vista, Xbox360 and Zune, Microsoft showed that they're not ready to keep up with the new technology demands of our generation. My hopes for them to get back as they were with Gates are so low. Apple and Sony are gonna run the business know, face it.
They're actually such small details.... I never notice this when I'm playing a game. I don't think both consoles should be compared by their graphics (which are the same, no matter how many details they miss), but for their games, their durability (which would determine the Xbox 360 as useless), performance, online gameplay, servers, etc. I really prefer the PS3 for it's awesome Network. Free and satisfying. I could play a PS2 game (or even a Wii game) and wouldn't care about it's graphics, as long as it's fun. Gamespot, this is pointless. If you are sooooo wanting to compare them, compare their perfomance and games. Graphics?? pft! Games are not all about graphics but the player's satisfaction. Also, I've found that the Sixaxis is more comfortable than the Xbox's controls, which are heavy, the buttons are badly positioned, and it's hard to handle. See? a better comparison! take note.
Vimanesba's comments