TruthTellers' forum posts

Avatar image for TruthTellers
TruthTellers

3393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By TruthTellers
Member since 2012 • 3393 Posts

@Solaryellow said:

Hopefully the cop gets a visit from Karma in the near future while he is out "upholding" the law.

This makes me laugh because I guarantee if I did something similar (enter a premise with good intentions) yet shot an animal I'd be in deep crapola. The gestapo gets a pass, huh?

It's like Nixon only in this case when the Police do it, it's not illegal.

Who the hell is going to reign in the militarization of the police in the US and stop their blatant disregard for the law? I heard a story about a botched SWAT raid that left a baby without a face from a flash grenade. Had that happened eighty years ago the locals would have grabbed the bastard who tossed the grenade and lynched his ass and I bet that if that happened today we wouldn't hear so much about police brutality.

And I'm not trying to be anti-police with this post because most police follow the rules, but there's some that don't and we end up with people dead or maimed because of them and they get a 30 day suspension, an internal review, and a slap on the wrist.

Avatar image for TruthTellers
TruthTellers

3393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 TruthTellers
Member since 2012 • 3393 Posts

And whatever the discussion is about the catholic church going on in this thread enough. It's not relevant.

Avatar image for TruthTellers
TruthTellers

3393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 TruthTellers
Member since 2012 • 3393 Posts

@The_Last_Ride said:

@TruthTellers said:

@The_Last_Ride said:

@TruthTellers said:

@thegerg said:

@The_Last_Ride: No, they can't. Not paying for something is not the same thing as imposing on someone's rights or health, or denying then from having it. For example, you do not pay for my medication, does that mean that you are allowed to deny me medication? Don't be a fool.

Calling birth control medication is a perversion of the term medication. Medication implies that it is necessary to eliminate or diminish a medical condition. Pregnancy isn't a medical condition and if anything birth control is an optional supplement.

Some women actually need it because it helps them medically, just because you don't get that means you should be able to deny them

Okay, then it applies for those women who may have medical conditions that require birth control but for those that do not have a condition that necessitates the use of birth control are not qualified for the supplemental pills.

Anyway, if employers do have religious reasons for not wanting to cover birth control, what's stopping the employees who "need" these pills from working somewhere else that offers insurance plans that cover birth control? It's a free market economy, nothing is keeping these women at these jobs or buying the product themselves.

Folly logic, what if they can't get work anywhere else? In this economy it isn't exactlt booming with work. Not everyone has the luxury of switching work because of kids, geography, etc. It's a fucking stupid ruling. You're basicly putting religion over freedom/free spech

There's nothing keeping the women from buying the pills themselves.

Avatar image for TruthTellers
TruthTellers

3393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By TruthTellers
Member since 2012 • 3393 Posts

@The_Last_Ride said:

@TruthTellers said:

@thegerg said:

@The_Last_Ride: No, they can't. Not paying for something is not the same thing as imposing on someone's rights or health, or denying then from having it. For example, you do not pay for my medication, does that mean that you are allowed to deny me medication? Don't be a fool.

Calling birth control medication is a perversion of the term medication. Medication implies that it is necessary to eliminate or diminish a medical condition. Pregnancy isn't a medical condition and if anything birth control is an optional supplement.

Some women actually need it because it helps them medically, just because you don't get that means you should be able to deny them

Okay, then it applies for those women who may have medical conditions that require birth control but for those that do not have a condition that necessitates the use of birth control are not qualified for the supplemental pills.

Anyway, if employers do have religious reasons for not wanting to cover birth control, what's stopping the employees who "need" these pills from working somewhere else that offers insurance plans that cover birth control? It's a free market economy, nothing is keeping these women at these jobs or buying the product themselves.

Avatar image for TruthTellers
TruthTellers

3393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By TruthTellers
Member since 2012 • 3393 Posts

@thegerg said:

@The_Last_Ride: No, they can't. Not paying for something is not the same thing as imposing on someone's rights or health, or denying then from having it. For example, you do not pay for my medication, does that mean that you are allowed to deny me medication? Don't be a fool.

Calling birth control medication is a perversion of the term medication. Medication implies that it is necessary to eliminate or diminish a medical condition. Pregnancy isn't a medical condition and if anything birth control is an optional supplement.

Avatar image for TruthTellers
TruthTellers

3393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By TruthTellers
Member since 2012 • 3393 Posts

@coasterguy65 said:

Yes....Keaton is pretty much the best at whatever he does.

Even Jack Frost?

Avatar image for TruthTellers
TruthTellers

3393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By TruthTellers
Member since 2012 • 3393 Posts

So the Supreme Court says that employers can opt out of the contraception coverage due to religious reasons... while this is a valid and otherwise acceptable reason for the unconstitutionality of that section of Obamacare, if not the entire law itself. The thing I question is: how is birth control even remotely related to healthcare or expanding coverage to those uninsured? I'd imagine that with contraception being so unrelated to even lowly preventative healthcare plans that employers should even have to provide contraception coverage at all.

Avatar image for TruthTellers
TruthTellers

3393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 TruthTellers
Member since 2012 • 3393 Posts

Why can't I date a girl with both?

But, to answer the question, I'd probably pick the ears. I don't mind implants, but I don't have a preference on breast size like I did when I was 13.

Avatar image for TruthTellers
TruthTellers

3393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 TruthTellers
Member since 2012 • 3393 Posts

In no particular order:

Full Metal Alchemist (both the original and Brotherhood)

Cowboy Bebop

Ghost in the Shell

Attack on Titan ( I'd heard a lot about this anime and by the fourth episode I was blown away. Very much deserving of praise)

Sword Art Online

Kekkaishi (can't believe no one else has mentioned this superb anime yet)

DBZ ( I don't really consider this anime mostly because of it's mainstream popularity. Great animated series that could use some 2 hour long OVA's like the Evangelion ones)

Avatar image for TruthTellers
TruthTellers

3393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 TruthTellers
Member since 2012 • 3393 Posts
@LostProphetFLCL said:

@TruthTellers said:

@LostProphetFLCL said:

@TruthTellers said:
@LostProphetFLCL said:

Republicans are so damn ridiculous.

"Lets sit around and not negotiate then bitch when the Dems find a way to get around their stand-stills."

The Republicans in Congress have no one to blame but themselves for this shit. It seems at this point this is the only option to get ANYTHING done anymore.

@LostProphetFLCL said:

@TruthTellers said:
@LostProphetFLCL said:

Republicans are so damn ridiculous.

"Lets sit around and not negotiate then bitch when the Dems find a way to get around their stand-stills."

The Republicans in Congress have no one to blame but themselves for this shit. It seems at this point this is the only option to get ANYTHING done anymore.

By having one man decide laws? No one man should make these decisions alone without prior consultation with Congress. Without the will of the Congress and thus, the will of the people, the nation will become a banana republic especially when it comes from an administration with as many scandals as this one. I take it you don't care about that however and you just want to see things get done. You know, Hitler made a lot of things happen and he did it alone.

just sayin...

This is your checks and balances at work here.

Congress won't get off it's ass to do anything so now the president is flexing his checking muscles here.

Also congrats on comparing Obama to Hitler! Shows you have an IQ in the single digits.

Comparing leaders that create the false concept of executive law when their roles are clearly defined in a 238 year old document to those in the past who have done the same and went on to become tyrants was a characteristic of low intelligence. Thank you for the lesson sir and enjoy your stay in the labor camps that they put you in.

Go see a psychiatrist.

Go to hell

I will in due time.

Loading Video...