TriffStar's forum posts

  • 21 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for TriffStar
TriffStar

579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 TriffStar
Member since 2003 • 579 Posts
OK Guys, I think we have to look at it like this: If the game has its flaws (almost every game does) then it doesn't deserve a high score (9.5-9.9/10). I think what Jeff is trying to say is that because of the problems in the game, like badly done textures/graphics compared to other Wii games (not comparing to PS3 or 360 ones), not having a good musical score (something all reviews i read say that), iffy controls compared to other wii games like truama (In zelda when u slash you dont actually aim, its just like pressing a button) and also the fact that the game isnt different enough from the other games in the series, oh and no voice over for characters. Some of these things are bettered say in.. ...Final Fantasy Series, which has one of the best graphics on the PS2, always original in each series and wildy different, good music and voiced characters, thats why it got a 40/40 in famitsu. So what I am trying to say is if zelda tp got a 9.5-9.9/10, what about the next zelda game for the Wii? If it had all these features it missed the first time, like improved textures, better music and sounds, voiced characters, better controls, then what? You cant get much better, other sites will have to say 10.5/10 (lol), you see what I mean? Whereas GS can say 9.6 or whatever. Thats what i think Jeff is trying to say, that it can be better and perfected to get that 10 score. Its not thats 8.8 is a bad score for a launch title, far from it. Whenever have u seen many launch titles get this higher a score. Thanks for reading
Avatar image for TriffStar
TriffStar

579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 TriffStar
Member since 2003 • 579 Posts

This my friends is the man who gave our beloved Zelda an 8.8...

PS: I already posted this on a different topic, but thought more of you might like to see it.

Softaco21

Err. I dont want to see this. That is just wrong. Oh and your beloved Zelda, have you played it yet?
Avatar image for TriffStar
TriffStar

579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 TriffStar
Member since 2003 • 579 Posts
OK Guys, I think we have to look at it like this:

If the game has its flaws (almost every game does) then it doesn't deserve a high score (9.5-9.9/10). I think what Jeff is trying to say is that because of the problems in the game, like badly done textures/graphics compared to other Wii games (not comparing to PS3 or 360 ones), not having a good musical score (something all reviews i read say that), iffy controls compared to other wii games like truama (In zelda when u slash you dont actually aim, its just like pressing a button) and also the fact that the game isnt different enough from the other games in the series, oh and no voice over for characters.

Some of these things are bettered say in.. ...Final Fantasy Series, which has one of the best graphics on the PS2, always original in each series and wildy different, good music and voiced characters, thats why it got a 40/40 in famitsu.

So what I am trying to say is if zelda tp got a 9.5-9.9/10, what about the next zelda game for the Wii? If it had all these features it missed the first time, like improved textures, better music and sounds, voiced characters, better controls, then what? You cant get much better, other sites will have to say 10.5/10 (lol), you see what I mean? Whereas GS can say 9.6 or whatever. Thats what i think Jeff is trying to say, that it can be better and perfected to get that 10 score.

Its not thats 8.8 is a bad score for a launch title, far from it. Whenever have u seen many launch titles get this higher a score.

Thanks for reading :D
Avatar image for TriffStar
TriffStar

579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 TriffStar
Member since 2003 • 579 Posts
do if you had a TV with slight higher res than 720p but lower than 1080i (e.g. 1366x768 or 1680x960) will u be able to play at those resolutions or will it be 720p?
Avatar image for TriffStar
TriffStar

579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 TriffStar
Member since 2003 • 579 Posts

Hi guys, awsome thread I have one question though. I am going to get the $499 ps3 version and play it on my PC monitor. It is widescreen and its native res is 1,680 x 1,050. Does this mean I can play at this res? Or will it end up being 1280 x 720 (720p)?

ty

  • 21 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3