TheFlameProof's forum posts

Avatar image for TheFlameProof
TheFlameProof

438

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 TheFlameProof
Member since 2007 • 438 Posts

K...fisrt off....

I'm pretty sure Super Man 64 was one of the worst games ever made. Ever...i remember playing that garbage and it was horrible.

secondly...

Halo lacking depth in multiplayer? Uh :|?

duble_Needler23

yes. i feel as thought it really shined in it's career mode. it's storyline reminds me of a good old game i played many years ago called final fantasy. it was an underground game at the time and still kind of is seeing not many know about it in the present day madness and media headed culture.

Avatar image for TheFlameProof
TheFlameProof

438

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 TheFlameProof
Member since 2007 • 438 Posts

i like both of them. they are of both equalness and thus they are different in being exactly the same.

halo is more deep while final fantasy hits you where you want to cry.

and trust me, i have cried many times.

both good music and i feel as though we must not discriminate between the two.

Avatar image for TheFlameProof
TheFlameProof

438

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 TheFlameProof
Member since 2007 • 438 Posts

halo and killzone are identical.

they both have a well balanced weapon variety.

they both look amazing.

they both play amazing.

they both are lacking a depth in multiplayer but are known for their awesome career/campaign modes.

they are also both heavily under-rated just like superman 64 was on the N64.

they are so underated that people actually hate these games without even considering whats going for them (just like superman 64).

i bet that half the population who hate superman 64 never even played it just as with halo and killzone.

all these games are equally fun and microsoft, sony, and nintendo should all be proud of their crowing achievements.