TMallory2482's forum posts

Avatar image for TMallory2482
TMallory2482

264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 TMallory2482
Member since 2007 • 264 Posts

This has been happening when running off of the battery. Not sure if it does on AC power as well

Avatar image for TMallory2482
TMallory2482

264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 TMallory2482
Member since 2007 • 264 Posts

I recently bought a floor model HP G72. During use, I find that the screen sometimes brightens/dims automatically. For instance, I'll have iTunes open, and I notice the screen gets small pulses/increases of brightness every second until it stops (after 3-4 times/seconds). Is this a possible defect with the monitor, or ome type of setting I should change?

Avatar image for TMallory2482
TMallory2482

264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 TMallory2482
Member since 2007 • 264 Posts

Posting from the new laptop. Went ahead and bought the G72 and I'm very happy with it. The battery was still in the box, they were running it through AC power the entire time. No cosmetic damage, seems brand new. Had to spend a fair amount of time removing HP's bloatware, but overall this thing rocks. Was originally $750, so I save $200 :)

Avatar image for TMallory2482
TMallory2482

264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 TMallory2482
Member since 2007 • 264 Posts

Hey everyone, a buddy of mine that works over at Staples told me they're selling their floor model G72 for $549. It has Windows 7 64-bit, Core i3 2.26ghz, 4GB of RAM, and the usual other offering of a modern laptop.

http://www.staples.com/HP-G72-250US-17.3-Laptop/product_886416

I was going to buy a 15.6'' Dell for $520, but for $30 more I could get this HP, which has just as good battery life (f not better), a larger screen, and I wouldn't have to pay shipping or wait to get it. I could drive there right now lol

My only worry is I might be tempted to overload the 320GB hard drive. The drive itself is also 5400RPM. However, my boss has a spare 500GB 7200RPM laptop drive he'd sell me for really cheap if I needed to upgrade. Also, this laptop only has the integrated graphics, but apparently the i3's integrated graphics are good enough to run stuff like CS1.6, Plants vs. Zombies, you know, simple and/or older games.

I'm mostly using this to do schoolwork, listen to music, watch some movies/TV shows, and websurfing. I'm going to throw virtual machine on it as well, it should have plenty of power to run a VM window of Linux Fedora (for my Unix course).

Avatar image for TMallory2482
TMallory2482

264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 TMallory2482
Member since 2007 • 264 Posts

Plants vs Zombies is good to play while listening to music. Easy to pause/switch songs. Game game be played entirely with the mouse, which makes it even easier.

Avatar image for TMallory2482
TMallory2482

264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 TMallory2482
Member since 2007 • 264 Posts
[QUOTE="TMallory2482"]

I really don't see this effecting anything, whether it be popularity or pricing. It's just the name. Consumers will be looking for the model number, i.e. 5970, instead of the brand name

tequilasunriser
Read my above post.

The average "non-techie" consumer doesn't even know who AMD is, which is because of Intel's brand popularity. Hell even somewhat-techie people I know avoid AMD just because it's not Intel. I don't really see this having a direct effect on popularity/sales/price, but if there's any changes people will blame the name change anyway so :D
Avatar image for TMallory2482
TMallory2482

264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 TMallory2482
Member since 2007 • 264 Posts

I really don't see this effecting anything, whether it be popularity or pricing. It's just the name. Consumers will be looking for the model number, i.e. 5970, instead of the brand name

Avatar image for TMallory2482
TMallory2482

264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 TMallory2482
Member since 2007 • 264 Posts
[QUOTE="TMallory2482"][QUOTE="swehunt"] No this is not what you can assume! For starter's, your using two diffrent labels on the memory, As far we know of they could have diffrent specs, Even two exsact alike set's of chips from the very same factory on the very same day in the very same batch can differ alot in terms of quality, You are trying to make a "chance" as a predetemin factor. Just return the one you've ordered and get a set of new ones capable of the speed you wan't to run. A 100Mhz on a 800Mhz memory is not a giant OC but why not do it the correct way from the start?swehunt
Well the new DDR2 800 is already on the way, so i'll take a week/some hassle to return it and get DDR2 1066. I'm pretty impatient lol. Besides, I don't need this to last me a few years, I'm just trying to get the most out of my E8400 before I upgrade to quad core sometime next year.

As i alredy said before it's your call, but im trying to help you from doing a mistake. ;) I've had quite a long relationship with s775 OC'ing, from my experience i can tell you that without ram that will hold what theyre men't to run at you will have a hard time reaching the OC you wan't and probably problem with stability to. When i try to FSB clock both quads and C2D's i usally pull out two stick leaving the dominator 1066 ram in because i wan't to be sure i'll hit high FSB without ram keeping me down. Higher Mhz ram do often need lower voltage than lower Mhz ram @ a given Mhz, therefor running cooler and probably without as much stress as the lower Mhz one's do. Any good s775 MB should be able to pull a FSB at 450Mhz, but the more voltage you dish out to the memory the risk your hitting a wall on both memory and MB. The only safe way to actually know you'll be hitting 450Mhz is running memory capable of atl. 900Mhz, without you're taking a gamble. "If" your new memory are capable to run 900Mhz (witch most should do) is only half the awnser, in most cases you'll have to change the timing's to the worse and then you will start to loose performance instead of gaining. So, even tho you might get a FSB450 you'll loose performance against getting a good set of 1066 witch probably could run at a better timing @ 900 running less hot and with less voltage. It's not entirely about what is possible it's also about what type of result your waiting to see, im guessing you have invested in a new cooler for your CPU and perhaps a cuple extra fans to the case, then why go short on the memory?, seem's like a bad choise when theres only a few $ diffrence. :? If you reach 4Ghz or 3,8Ghz won't matter in the end, both are fine for any game out and to be honest it's very little diffrence, but if it's about benchmarks i have a fealing you'll regret your purchase. A Quad would be better invested money than purchasing memory with the same specs, instead just add the two GB you got with another two GB but as i explained the chanse would even be slimmer of hitting the 850Mhz your at now. I am sorry but nor do i see the benefit to raise the CPU from where you have it but also buying simular spec'ed ram, if anything you could add them with the ones you got and use all 6GB that is the best to do with what you got. :)

I'm just trying to hit 4.0ghz stable for the sake of hitting 4.0ghz to be honest lol. Tonight I'll try 450mhz with what I have now just to get an idea of what I can do when the new chips come (tomorrow, wednesday latest). If I can get it stable at the stock 1.8v with 450mhz, I should be all set. If it BSOD's, I'll try bumping the voltage to 2.0 At that point if it's not stable, I'll settle with 3.8ghz. Not really trying to pump 2.1v+ if I'm just trying to break the 4.0 barrier for bragging rights/personal satisfaction :) (I'd use the new 2x2gb with my current 2x1gb, but my new CPU cooler blocks a slot, which is why I bought 2x2gb to replace them. I'd throw one of the extra 1GB chips in, but it wouldn't be dual channel so I'm not sure how it'd effect performance/stability. Then again,when I had the full 4GB I was on a 32-bit OS so I was only getting 3.5gb in performance since I had a 512mb video card. I have a 1GB video card now, so I'll install a 64-bit version of W7. Hopefully that extra 512mb of RAM will offset any performance loss I may see while OC'ing)
Avatar image for TMallory2482
TMallory2482

264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 TMallory2482
Member since 2007 • 264 Posts
[QUOTE="swehunt"][QUOTE="TMallory2482"]

I mean my current G.Skill memory is at 850mhz (425x2)and running fine and stable at stock voltages. The new AData chips have the exact same specs, so I could try getting my G.Skills up to 900mhz, and if it does, one can assume the AData's would be just as stable no?

And I'm not shootin' for 1066, just a boost up to 900mhz so I can run my E8400 @ 4.0ghz.

No this is not what you can assume! For starter's, your using two diffrent labels on the memory, As far we know of they could have diffrent specs, Even two exsact alike set's of chips from the very same factory on the very same day in the very same batch can differ alot in terms of quality, You are trying to make a "chance" as a predetemin factor. Just return the one you've ordered and get a set of new ones capable of the speed you wan't to run. A 100Mhz on a 800Mhz memory is not a giant OC but why not do it the correct way from the start?

Well the new DDR2 800 is already on the way, so i'll take a week/some hassle to return it and get DDR2 1066. I'm pretty impatient lol. Besides, I don't need this to last me a few years, I'm just trying to get the most out of my E8400 before I upgrade to quad core sometime next year.
Avatar image for TMallory2482
TMallory2482

264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 TMallory2482
Member since 2007 • 264 Posts

I mean my current G.Skill memory is at 850mhz (425x2)and running fine and stable at stock voltages. The new AData chips have the exact same specs, so I could try getting my G.Skills up to 900mhz, and if it does, one can assume the AData's would be just as stable no?

And I'm not shootin' for 1066, just a boost up to 900mhz so I can run my E8400 @ 4.0ghz.