[QUOTE="luckykoopsie"]

[QUOTE="Jag85"] More or less true...

Top 10 best-selling PlayStation games:

1. Gran Turismo
2. Gran Turismo 2
3. Final Fantasy VII
4. Final Fantasy VIII
5. Tomb Raider II
6. Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone
7. Crash Bandicoot 3: Warped
8. Tomb Raider
9. Metal Gear Solid
10. Crash Bandicoot

Top 10 best-selling Nintendo 64 games:

1. Super Mario 64
2. Mario Kart 64
3. GoldenEye 007
4. The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time
5. Super Smash Bros.
6. Diddy Kong Racing
7. Pokémon Stadium
8. Donkey Kong 64
9. The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask
10. Star Fox 64

From these lists, the PS1 and N64 have two "anime" style games each (FF VII & VIII and Zelda OOT & MM), while the N64 has more than twice as many "kiddy" games as the PS1.

Jag85

nope your just biased,  so your perception and point of view on all those games is just totally worthless.

The red marked games are kids friendly, the PS1 has 2 more games in that regard.

Also I find something interesting. Goldeneye alone has sold better than the entire PS1 fps library... how is this possible? I mean fps games are always the most controversial when it comes to violence, in fact they give the player the possibility to kill something from the 1st person view. There are no excuses if you include how the PS1 has 3x bigger user base.

Of course, the PS1 was marketed as a gaming system for an older audience, but you have to know it was the console with the most sales and jrpgs. For this reason, I believe the most customers were kids and jrpg fans. Your table above and the low sales of fps games in relation to the user base make my justification even more credible. But to be fair, kids at least are always the majoritiy customers of gaming systems, no matter of marketing, adult content etc.

Note:

Zelda is not anime/japanese based.

Because the PS1 was the most enjoyable system for kids and anime fans. It's for a good reason how games like Harry Potter and Final Fantasy have sold so well. Also CDs were cheaper and piracy pushed the console sales.

It was all about Sonys hype train, CD burners and mass manipulation.

[QUOTE="Stefan91x"]

Because it has input lag

Renegade_Fury

Eh, the only real time slowdowns become noticeable is in the dance club, but I don't mind it. It's like what happens in Lightening Force or MUSHA during crazier moments, and SoR2 suffers from the same issue on mania. I don't find them annoying, but if you do, play the steam, xbl, psn, or ultimate genesis versions.

Because it has input lag

And Mario 64 isn't groundbreaking, that's been the whole point of our arguments. All the things that Nintendo's hype machine tells you, isn't true. Mario 64 isn't the first 3D platformer. It's isn't the first open-world 3D game. And the N64 controller isn't the first analog controller. Mario 64 is simply the first 3D Mario game.

To be revolutionary at something, you have to be the first.

Emerald_Warrior

To be revolutionary at something, you have to be the first.

Emerald_Warrior

And Mario 64 was revolutionary for the reason I have stated above. It showed many gamers and developers how 3D platforming should work.

Why do you trow arround with your "Nintendo hype" nonsense. It has nothing to do with hype, fanaticism or something else. The N64 was revolutionary for plausible reasons, saying otherwise is false. It seems you're hating on a system because many people here enjoy it, and this is pathetic and pitifully. You re are not even better than Another 48 Hours/Eddie Murphy 48 or Bultjie in that case.

yes and your definition is wrong. saturn and psx had fully 3d graphics, 2 years before n64 had.

bultje112

and by unique controller, you mean most attrocious controller design in history for 3d games?

bultje112

[QUOTE="Stefan91x"]

[QUOTE="bultje112"]

 

virtua fighter and tekken, ridge racer and sega rally revolutioned 3d graphics on consoles, your trolling is fails again

Jag85

Just because I said something negative about the Dreamcast is a laughable reason to call me a troll, you ******* psycho. You're probably the rudest person on this board.

Modern games are too much focused on stories.

[QUOTE="Stefan91x"]

[QUOTE="bultje112"]

 

virtua fighter and tekken, ridge racer and sega rally revolutioned 3d graphics on consoles, your trolling is fails again

Emerald_Warrior

Just because I said something negative about the Dreamcast is a laughable reason to call me a troll, you ******* psycho. You're probably the rudest person on this board.

Saturn didn't have "naked" 3D graphics. It had fully 3D graphics, with textures.

[QUOTE="Stefan91x"]

Dreamcast was not ahead of its time, just overhyped by hardcore Sega fans because it was Segas last attempt into the console business.

N64 revolutionized 3D graphics on consoles and has very innovative and unique games, while the Dreamcast did not that much for the gaming industry.

It's not even close.

bultje112

virtua fighter and tekken, ridge racer and sega rally revolutioned 3d graphics on consoles, your trolling is fails again

Just because I said something negative about the Dreamcast is a laughable reason to call me a troll, you ******* psycho. You're probably the rudest person on this board.