Sasho1313, if I ever had any respect for you (which I don't), I would certainly have lost it after your little rant.
Let's see... Hammerpoint bans people from the forums for complaining about the game. If they appealed, Hammerpoint didn't even LOOK at them; they used a copy-pasted "We have evidence that you have used multiple hacks. Your ban appeal has been denied." Which may be true in SOME cases, but EVERY case? I call BULL on that. They've also been accused of bullying and bribing people who complain about War Z.
Their president tried to defend the game by saying the first map was over 100 square kilometers in size. Again, BULL. It was about 10 square kilometers... about ONE-TENTH the size he claimed it was.
When they first launched on Steam, they stated in a press release Now that weve reached the Foundation Release milestone we will continue to work, as promised, to add features and content that will satisfy our community and keep them playing. Gosh, you mean all the stuff that was listed as features, that weren't even in the game?
You know exactly what I mean. "Multiple game worlds" (it had ONE game world). "A skill-based leveling system" (it had NO leveling system.) "Player-versus-Environment combat" (at launch, it was solely PvP). "Private servers" (NOPE! Not in the game!) It's no wonder why the game was pulled from Steam two days later, and accusations of fraud were leveled at it.
And before you open your mouth and say "All those features were added later", NO THEY WEREN'T... and if you're going to list something as a feature, it had damn well better be in the program, otherwise there's this little law called "Truth in Advertising".
Sorry, Sasho, but your response to the review just makes you sound like a company shill... maybe one of the users that was bribed, even.
Log in to comment