This franshise has 2 distinct fan groups, so while I agree with you, out of respect for the othe group of fans, I think Ubisoft should split the experiences into different games:
- The modern part (which some people are interested in, but always dissapointed with because of lack of content and closure) and;
- The historical part (which other people are interested in).
(Don't bash eachother for having different tastes.)
Nobody, but when you see a game say like, the famous tomb raider for instance, where a woman brutally kills a bunch of men with something like a crow-bar to the neck after sneaking up to him (not self defense), nobody complains about misandry (basically, that shows that people are okay with it), so why should people complain about misogyny when a man shoots a zombie woman in the face (probably self defense) in a game...?
I just don't see the point of complaining about one and being passive about the other. I personally think it's rather ignorant.
Again, I have nothing against women, only unfair gender equality. Cheers.
I don't understand... Why do you want me to go away? I'm just stating a fact. I'm not saying I have a fettish for harming women (and I don't), I'm just bothered by the fact that Misogyny is treated differently from Misandry, when it's the exact same thing.
I'm not offending anyone, I just want to know why people see a difference on the two (because I don't)...
Druckmann said Mankind never came to light because it was a "misogynistic idea. "Female co-workers at Naughty Dog would say to Druckmann that, while they understood the idea, "'the way it's coming off is you're having a bunch of women turning into monsters and you're shooting them in the face.'"
"Decant said at the onset of development, Ubisoft will focus on one "master version" and concentrate its efforts on this version before moving to other iterations. The PC version comes last, he said."
Well, so much for the expression "Master Race", lol XD
ShadowOfKratos' comments