SauceKing's forum posts

Avatar image for SauceKing
SauceKing

679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 SauceKing
Member since 2011 • 679 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"]What an awful idea. Should be the opposite. Parents should be taxed for bringing those pests into the world. Hexagon_777

You were obviously brought into this world as an adult from the get go.

oh snap

Avatar image for SauceKing
SauceKing

679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 SauceKing
Member since 2011 • 679 Posts

TC better be an ethiopian.

because if britain or australia calls an american fat, its like a 375lb guy calling a 400lb guy fat.

Avatar image for SauceKing
SauceKing

679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 SauceKing
Member since 2011 • 679 Posts

A guy went gay for his Bible. Christians gonna love that.Zeviander

the bible is a dude? aww sick, cant believe ive been in love with that thing.

Avatar image for SauceKing
SauceKing

679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 SauceKing
Member since 2011 • 679 Posts

[QUOTE="SauceKing"]

[QUOTE="mAArdman"]

wrong place. **** off.

Containmomentum

i made a laptop with a plywood case, and called it lapdancetops.... so include my super obscure manufacturing brand too.

Has nothing to do with obsciure, some don't even include phillips and that's a popular brand, i just need a list of all relevant laptop brands. especially ones not currently dead. how about helping instead of being jackasses?

because then this wouldnt be the internet.

If you showed your compiled list of manufacturers and asked for help identifying missing entries, thats one thing.

but you want someone to do everything for you, at least put some effort into it before you go asking for help. When i was in spanish class and asked online mexicans to correct my reports, i at least wrote the english version and ran that crap through an online translator first. Put a little effort into it.

Avatar image for SauceKing
SauceKing

679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 SauceKing
Member since 2011 • 679 Posts

[QUOTE="Containmomentum"][QUOTE="paranoidpixie95"]

Wikipedia should have more than enough for you.

mAArdman

Yes, of course. wait no. As i said, incomplete. Wiki is missing terrible amounts of brands.



wrong place. **** off.

i made a laptop with a plywood case, and called it lapdancetops.... so include my super obscure manufacturing brand too.

Avatar image for SauceKing
SauceKing

679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 SauceKing
Member since 2011 • 679 Posts

[QUOTE="SauceKing"]

[QUOTE="Serraph105"] you haven't been keeping up with state legislation have you?Serraph105

well alot of people contradict their own personal views of liberty.

if you ask someone if a person is threatening another person's life, do they have a right to defend themselves? 99% of people will say yes. This is what i consider one's view of personal liberty.

Now if you ask them if a fetus is a person, they will say yes... and if that person is threatening someone else's life... does the mother have a right to defend herself?

well thats just where their limited scope of thought breaks down, and they might contradict their own view of personal liberty. But ultimately their view of personal liberty supports abortion in these cases, whether they like it or not.

I was actually referring to a woman being raped. There has been quite a bit of legislation that was designed to make abortion illegal even in the case of rape. There has only been one instance trying to make abortion illegal even in the case of the mother's life being in danger that I know of and it got changed.

still works, if a person walks into your home univited and starts stealing your food against your will (even if they need it to live)... most people would agree you have the right to eject them.

as should a person that enters your body against your will and starts stealing your nutrients be justly ejected.

You can make the arguement that someone should take care of this person. But i doubt any republican lawmaker is willing to say you legally have to care for people that come into your home against your will, if their life depends on it.

Avatar image for SauceKing
SauceKing

679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 SauceKing
Member since 2011 • 679 Posts

[QUOTE="SauceKing"]

[QUOTE="mindstorm"] Promotes the idea that people have a right to use abortion, yes. This is not to say that there are not a number of people who are explicitly pro-abortion and believe its use should be encouraged as a form of birth control. I do agree that they are far more rare however.Serraph105

thats a whole other can of worms.

but people do have a right to abortion in cases of rape or when the mother's life is at stake. Those circumstances are inarguable by any widely held understanding of personal liberty.

you haven't been keeping up with state legislation have you?

well alot of people contradict their own personal views of liberty.

if you ask someone if a person is threatening another person's life, do they have a right to defend themselves? 99% of people will say yes. This is what i consider one's view of personal liberty.

Now if you ask them if a fetus is a person, they will say yes... and if that person is threatening someone else's life... does the mother have a right to defend herself?

well thats just where their limited scope of thought breaks down, and they might contradict their own view of personal liberty. But ultimately their view of personal liberty supports abortion in these cases, whether they like it or not.

Avatar image for SauceKing
SauceKing

679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 SauceKing
Member since 2011 • 679 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"]If you do you're a huge dumbass. MrGeezer
SOME of the people "playing the lottery" are "huge dumbasses". Hell, maybe even MOST of them are "huge dumbasses". But keep in mind...most of the people drawing pictures or making photographs or playing videogames are never going to earn a single goddamn penny doing so. That's just a big hole into which consumers pour their money. There's also nothing inherently wrong with that. I'd like to point out that many of the people "playing the lottery" are well aware of the fact that they are simply throwing away money. The thing here is that they have fun doing it. Instead of spending $60 bucks on a new ****ing videogame, they spend $5 a week on lottery tickets. On the list of things that people waste their money on, The Lottery CAN be pretty freaking benign. A few bucks a week is cheaper than a movie or a videogame, and it's a hell of a lot better than wasting one's money on cigarettes or booze.

i was with you til the end portion, nothing is better than wasting money on cigarettes and booze.

Avatar image for SauceKing
SauceKing

679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 SauceKing
Member since 2011 • 679 Posts

lottery is often considered a tax on stupid people.

one of my dear friends often buys lottery tickets, i dont say anything because im actually a little jealous. I wish i could buy that kind of hope and optimism for a few bucks a month.