@deviltaz35: Disagree with doing the same thing for 100 hrs. I do like to kill things and explore though but even the side quests are more interesting in fallout than TW3 - to me. And I liked NV a lot more than FO3. FO4 should be a great game and will be well worth the $60 no doubt.
This can't be true. In real life, if you ran for 10 minutes you only could get 2 miles if you were one of the fastest humans. So the map is like 2 miles wide (4 square miles)? OK, OK I know this is a game, but even running in game at ballpark speed (compared to real life), the map would only be like 4 miles wide (16 square miles)? I read somewhere else it was like 27 square miles....goddamn internet
@txuzai: I agree the weather system was great in TW3. The wind was superb. However, if FO4 is not significantly better all around than TW3 I will be disappointed. There was something about TW3 that I just could not get immersed in, like I have with Fallout games. Don't get me wrong, I finished the game and it was worth $60, but there's just something special about these Fallout games...
@spartanx169x Yeah, right. Women here in the US of A will pretty much take any compliment they can get. And most would LOVE to be called God Damn Beautiful - whether they like to admit it or not.
MrBunson's comments