@superklyph: Hell yeah! That's a pretty damn good "Thank you". Especially a night out for drinks not having to pay.. Not often do MEN get that opportunity alone.

@sbbu: Yeah along with every virus for said games.

@jergernice1: Nice argument. If this was 1989.

Wait so buy the game to demo it? Lol nice exploit of steams refund policy which they state it is not to be used like this..

I can already see the discussions/community hub in flames from people who are unable to refund do to already using up their refund options with another game recently.

This company is about to get A LOT of bad press.

@yazman666: lol "I'm done with CoD! I'm just going to buy the new WWII CoD used for $55.79."

Logic.

Patrice? He?

His parents didn't like him .

@gamingdevil800: I'm all about historical accuracy. However, I don't buy games for historical accuracy nor do I expect that of any developer. I play games to get away from real life. I read books to learn about history.

$20-40 for a decade old game that's just polished?

LMAO it should be $20 MAXIMUM and that's not saying that it even deserves a $20 price tag. Even the first CoD game is still $20 and its almost 15 years old. Besides at this point you'll be paying $20-40 for a outdated engine that only offers a single player campaign with a multiplayer that will probably last a month or 2 at most before it dies again.

People need to stop supporting this business model. They're a developer that's rehashing old material because they're running out of new material to put in their games.

His wife is concerned about female characters in a video game based on war.

Priorities.

@biggamerdude: That's true. Besides Activision is in a dilemma they created because they have no other games bringing money in and they don't have a team creative enough to develop a NEW game. At this point it would be too risky for them but at the same time they're on a sinking ship. It's only a matter of time before Activision goes down.