@tj_l33t: yeah, me too. i'll definitely pass on this one. after MW3, i've had enough. i couldn't stand the same formula over and over again.

"Call of Duty: INFINITE WARFARE", eh?

THAT should give you an idea on how many more CoD games will come out in the future.. -_-

oh well.. in the end, it's all up to the gamer.. don't want it? then don't buy it.

@RO-nIn187

with that rig, you wouldn't even need to upgrade for the next century!

i just wish they'd revert back to the control scheme of pre-AC3 games. really, that's the only thing that made the game so horrible... oh, and characters like connor and achilles.

i'm a fan of the CoD franchise, but this is getting ridiculous.

i don't understand the graphics of this game. clearly, the graphics of BO2 is no different from its predecessors' (which i play at max settings @ constant 60fps), but somehow, i get huge FPS drops on certain areas in this game. even at medium settings, there are still huge FPS drops. i can't believe i'm playing crysis or farcry3 on high settings with better FPS rates than this game.other than that, the gameplay feels.. 'different'. honestly, i liked the CoD franchise from the first to MW3 as far as SP campaigns are concerned (so you could pretty much call me a CoD fan), but this game? i can't even bring myself to finish the first 4 missions of the campaign.

i can't fookin' wait!

what the hell is this sh--!?

crysis 1 was the best FPS game i've ever played. i've played it over 5 times just because i find it so much fun. crysis 2 was alright, but it never made me feel like playing it again after beating the game once. it's lacking something big. i'm not sure what that is, but i'm sure it's the thing that could possibly make me want to play the game again. maybe i hate being confined in such tight spaces? @_@