Wow, this thread went downhill kinda fast. Did half of System Wars follow me here?
Well whatever, Galaxy is a great game, regardless of what a few nay-sayers say otherwise.
[QUOTE="Casiotech"]I guess the mods aren't agreeing with you on this one.JordanElek
Actually, I do agree that some of your statements have been ridiculous. All major review sites only rate games based on corporate sponsorships? Professional reviewers have no special talent at writing reviews? Mario Galaxy is not a real game? These statements completely discredit your opinion.
But having an illegitimate opinion is not necessarly trolling. I've left it mostly alone because I like to see people actually getting into a discussion. It's dangerous for you to come into a thread like this and start hating on the game in question, though. Just keep it civil (it's had its ups and downs so far).
I do somewhat agree with you about reviewers using the average length of a game to determine its "real" length. A game like GTA or Elder Scrolls has a certain average length to complete the primary storyline; but if a gamer so chooses, he can stretch that length almost as much as he wants. Not all games are like that, though. I think it's a positive thing for a game to have optional gameplay that increases its value to some people. So while Galaxy may take under 15 hours to beat, you can play for another 20 hours if you so choose and still be playing original content. That's much different from beating a 15-hour game with no extra content twice. You can't fault a developer for providing extra content outside what's required. If you don't like the game much, it'll be shorter; but if you love the game, it'll be longer with the extra stuff you can do. It makes sense.
I thank you. The argument (and quote tree) was getting out of hand there. So has anyone talked about the 11/10 that ONM Italy gave to Galaxy? I found it pretty funny (in a good way).
Log in to comment