While I respect the reviewers opinions and understand them, I don't dislike the story or feel serious multiplayer imbalance. The new story twists are welcome in my opinion, although the writing may feel lack-luster. The multiplayer is fine, I'm toss which has been considered the weakest in this expansion and I'm doing fine in my 1v1's. My main problem with this game is the mission design. Hero missions are painfully easy on any difficulty and other missions feel like remade versions of WoL missions.
Although its hard to categorize people, if I had to choose between the twelve choices proposed so far I would say I'm a:
-Introvert (yet I can enjoy multiplayer sometimes so that one's lenient)
-Completionist
-Difficulty Snob (I always make the difficulty max but don't hate on people who like an easier game. I get it, and if your new its nice to have an easy mode. However, I hate games that conform to the masses by becoming casual if previous installments were difficult)
@TheLamaKnows I agree, but its not like they can change it know. Originally it was true, you were in fact and assassin. That is what Altair was. In terms of Ezio, Connor, and Desmond not so much but still, the name stuck.
Well, the series evolved. If Altair was created in the second game, he would be more dynamic. The first game was an experiment gone right, and for the time he was dynamic, just more subtle and less relate-able than Ezio.
Well, this is DLC done right. It was not preplanned; it was made on fan request. They could've simply kept the extra content on PC and not given it to us console gamers. I both game PC and PS3 so I will be getting the PC release just because Dark Souls is one of my favorite games of all time.
GTA V is great and all..but I'm probably going to be much more interested in this game. I mean literally...this is the most realistic looking city yet I have seen in a game. You play as the most awesome bad @$$ hacker on Earth and the story looks phenomenal. Good work, ubisoft!
Jmaster211's comments