[QUOTE="padaporra"]
Tomb Raider > The Last of Us yet again.
shadiezz2012
:shock:
Lol xD [spoiler] The hunting deer part was better in the last of us than tomb raider [/spoiler][QUOTE="padaporra"]
Tomb Raider > The Last of Us yet again.
shadiezz2012
:shock:
Lol xD [spoiler] The hunting deer part was better in the last of us than tomb raider [/spoiler][QUOTE="techno-waves"]I have seen the graphics on the Vita, smooth O/S, wonder why the poor sales? Lack of games? If though as rumor has it, it can be ported to the PS4 and play the same games. AWESOME!wakefulnessTo be fair, it's a big perception problem with VITA; but Sony dug that hole themselves bc they wanted to push "Wonderbook" over VITA (or even some cool PS3 games) during last years E3. The kind of recovery for that lately has been all the developer/indie developer support they are getting for the system. Games like Limbo and Thomas Was alone, etc are coming out or are already out. There are games, but it's just that the image of VITA having no games will stand until this years E3 where Sony need to recover from their last blunder and all the rumors of VITA's "early demise" at the hands of doomsayers who love to go online and hammer on systems (for no good reason). Lol too bad that sony is trying super hard to dig Vitas grave. . They announced what 12 new Indie games for ps4 -___- Why not announce them for a console that really really. really needs games Sony
Ports are both positive and negative, its a big negative for those with ps3's or other consoles where they can play them. But for those without or those who would rather play on the vita i see no problemThere is no big show for Vita. How many times have Sony said this only to leave their fans dissapointed. None of their fans want rehashes and tired ports for Vita. They want games for the system.
jimmypsn
[QUOTE="Hoznary"]It all depends, because if they stop making games for the vita how will you play them while you are on a road trip? or in an area without internet?wakefulness
Who's "they"?
Sony/developers, i mean if it is as easy as Sony makes it out to be to develop for the PS4 whats the point in developing for the vita? When you get the ps4 crowd + the vita crowd with one stone?I find this as a plus and a minus, the plus being that Vita's will sell but the minus is that why create vita games when you can create ps4 games that you can play on the vita? I hope that more new vita games come out instead of just ps4 games.[QUOTE="Hoznary"][QUOTE="wakefulness"]
Yeah, but that comes off as "we [at SCE/Sony] want all companies to do this, but it's more of an after thought" to outsiders.
When YOSP was reffering to game devs/pubs submitting their final build, Yoshida also uses the term "ask" and this does not sound like a strict guideline or hard rule. In other words, this evidence all might not actually mean all games will incorperate reamote play streaming or there will be remote play enabled games that are weak.
wakefulness
That's actually a good mentality for AAA third party publishers to adopt. Think of it, how many AAA games have ever been announced for VITA? You could probably count the number of multi-million dollar worth IP's for vita on a single hand.
With Remote Play, the VITA can adopt all those big franchises and shrink them down. Again, it's a case of the games integrate well enough and if it's got the okay from every key player making the PS4<>VITA "experience".
It all depends, because if they stop making games for the vita how will you play them while you are on a road trip? or in an area without internet?[QUOTE="Slashkice"]
[QUOTE="wakefulness"]
Wait, where and when did this bit of info come to light? I've seen ad on a website allude to "remote play" and "vita", "Ps4", "streaming game" but . . .
Is there actual evidence from third parties design docs (and the like) that mention VITA remote play is enabled for all titles? The hurdle of technically getting a good experience (across different user interfaces) is one thing. After that, there could be legal gibberish preventing second screen streaming as norm (albiet a minor, dumb arguement).
wakefulness
It's from an interview with Shuhei Yoshida back when the PS4 was revealed:
"We ask developers when they finish the PlayStation 4 product and submit a master to make sure that they have the appropriate controller mapping to work on PS Vita. All games will work unless it is a dance game [laughs]."
Yeah, but that comes off as "we [at SCE/Sony] want all companies to do this, but it's more of an after thought" to outsiders.
When YOSP was reffering to game devs/pubs submitting their final build, Yoshida also uses the term "ask" and this does not sound like a strict guideline or hard rule. In other words, this evidence all might not actually mean all games will incorperate reamote play streaming or there will be remote play enabled games that are weak.
I find this as a plus and a minus, the plus being that Vita's will sell but the minus is that why create vita games when you can create ps4 games that you can play on the vita? I hope that more new vita games come out instead of just ps4 games.Oddly i feel the same, after last years e3 it makes me want to go in hypeless. I would rather have them blow my mind instead of expecting to have my mind blown, you know what i mean?Ill believe it when I see it. I know the Vita will have better titles in the future but I cant trust pre E3 hype anymore.
Shirokishi_
Log in to comment