It was actually a fun game, but looked too much pay to win.

This is the fate of every "online only" games or games "dependent on flowing cash" like the new F2P wave.

*Still mourns for Tabula Rasa*

Different unit skins DLC, 4.99$s.

Blood Effects DLC, 4.99$s.

Mark my words.

@shingui5 @Grenadeh Imo, Rome 2 is way better campaign map wise, but sloppy on combat compared to Shogun.

Shogun Total War 2 was worse in every aspect of the campaign map compared to other Total War games.

Rome is going to be a great game after a couple of major patches.

@berzerk0912 @Hakkology Imagine getting 4 bucks for every bug you submit. That game would be so polished it would shine.

Game devs should actually pay to their "beta testers".

More bugs found = more payment.

There, fixed game unlike the new Rome: Total War.

@endorbr @Hakkology I guess i should add i'm a little old fashioned :).

Morals...

You do this, you lose your chance of working at Sony again.

It's more like the way you shake hands after being a guest for a long time.

Pagan invasion time :D.

I only wish game wasn't this clunky and slow.

Game looks really great with the feel of "Rome". It feels a step back from Shogun "combat wise" but a step forward "campaign map" wise.

I only wish that soldiers had different skins and the wait time between turns wasn't torturing. It feels a bit incomplete, and the first week patch proves my point.

Still, has great potential.

Bu... But.... But.... Thief _???? :(