The day after I downloaded Trpoico 3 it stopped working. I've tried reinstalling. Any suggestions?

i had the same problem. You use to many bullets for one guy. But its really hard to find a tactial shooter with a little bit of CoD in it.

I love Tom Clancy games. I think that would be a great I idea. I think if you combined GRAW 2 and CoD you would get a game like Crysis

CoD developers are soon going to run out of ideas. EA has the perfect chance to start a new IP. I have a great idea for one but the only problem is it's hard for gamers to get ideas to the big publishing companies.

Yeah I guess my load out idea didn't make logical sense. I just thought that would a cool system to put in the game. I agree with you about the fact that it did feel like CoD. I don't think Danger Close did that on purpose but the game just came out like that. I just wanted the game to be a little bit more tactical.

1. The new title for a possible sequel should be Medal of Honor: Horrors of Afghan. The reason I choose this name was because I think the Medal of Honor game should have featured civilians. In war there is obviously a lot on blood and gore not only from fighting forces but from civilians that were killed in cross fire or hostage situation. The sequel should be bloodier but should also give play the ability to control the blood and gore levels.

2. A big problem for me was that I thought that there was not a lot of weapons and weapon customization. My favorite weapon was the M4 but that shouldn't have been the gun I used the most. Examples of weapon are: Mk 16/17, HK416, SPAS 12, AA 12, Vector, and MP5K. At the beginning of the single player mission there should be a weapon load out screen. You should have the option to choose the type of weapon, magazine size, sight, suppressor, GL, and grip. Maybe you could do the same for the AI teammates.

3. When playing the single play for 1 1/2 hours the levels felt repetitive. Shoot the enemy get to the checkpoint mission over. I wanted the mission to have more objectives. Maybe start it off with a stealth mission, then rescue a POW, and then defend a base. I don't know. I just want more variety. In some secondary objectives as well. This I think will stretch the game time.

4. No more invisible walls. I don't want invisible walls in my game. I want freedom you son of a **** That's why I play games. Invisible walls make the player feel trapped.

5. The game needs to be more difficult. I played the game on hard and beat it without any trouble. The game felt very easy. The single player lacked challenge. So much for authentic.

6. I loved how characters looked. Bad-ass. Cool. Lacked personality. I wanted more character development. The Tier 1 Op should have each had their own personality. This is something the developers should add to give more emotion to the game.

Pros: The game sounded great. The gun shots and explosions were the best part. I also like the selective fire. Some of the single player mechanistic should have been added to multiplayer.

PS: Don't back down next time.

[QUOTE="GodofGore22"]

I know that they didn't lose their rights. But they're being treated as if they don't have any.

XaosII

But they do. And they can excersize that right. It just doesn't make financial sense to do so. EA is more disappointed about the "waste" of resources spent on developing the Taliban side given the outcome. The developers are probably more concerned about keeping their job and not having the game/contract shelved because of this.

Most gamers will probably be apathetic towards it. Im sorry to say, but you're preaching to an empty stadium.

True. I'm sleep so I wrote a horrible post. I need to do this during the weekends. I like the saying though. "but you're preaching to an empty stadium." I'll use it one day

Its not that serious.

They are just following the money. There more money lost by implementing it than there is to be gained, based onn their analysis. They didnt lose their rights or free speech. They simply arent choosing to do so in a controversial way. EA deciding to back down - willingly - is a sign of free speech as well.

XaosII

I know that they didn't lose their rights. But they're being treated as if they don't have any.

Rewritting

Agreed