Geocross' comments

Avatar image for Geocross
Geocross

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Well, with those reviews being completely different from one another you can't get a clear idea so it seems it's up to the reviewer's likes, but to be honest you can't trust too much on reviewers these days.

Avatar image for Geocross
Geocross

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I'm downloading it. Curious about the campaign but I'm not very inrerested in the multiplayer, we'll see.

Avatar image for Geocross
Geocross

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@topgun182: well I will eventually get it but not right now, I think the current state of the game is not worth it, but that's just my preference... now, I never said anything about the animations but yeah, it is part of the problem

Avatar image for Geocross
Geocross

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I'm reluctant to invest any money in this game, I was so eager to get it before its release but after watching videos and reviews I'm dissappointed. I think I'll wait until it's ridiculously cheap or free through GWG.

Avatar image for Geocross
Geocross

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Yeah... Adding a mustache is way cheaper than removing it digitally, but I get it, one movie has more budget than the other I think

Avatar image for Geocross
Geocross

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Bayonetta... OMG I was waiting for this game to go on sale and now MS gave it to us for free... right after I just bought it on steam lol. But awesome anyways.

Avatar image for Geocross
Geocross

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Geocross

Nice! I was waiting for this long time ago! now hopefully SF III online edition will be added next.

Avatar image for Geocross
Geocross

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Geocross

I just read an article in the verge that says "Microsoft can’t explain why its 4K is $100 better than Sony’s" and the content is so full of fanboyism and misleading words like microsoft want to start a resolution war (when sony was the first to do that) or that people don't have 4k TVs and that PS4 Pro can do 4k as well (a big lie and it barely hits 30fps) for $100 less... heh! the price is right, is cheaper than many people expected and for what they offer compared to the Pro, it has way more power, the BC, a 4k UHD player, the quality of the hardware the console is built, DX12 integrated, more games are coming and they don't use a cheap upscaling to 4K tech. If you don't care about 4K, and are happy with just 1080p and 30-60fps you can buy a PS4 or Xbox one S wich is what casual gamers will do but the Xbox one X has its target and it's your choice but even by being $100 more expensive than its competition, the value is there. I agree with what Dave McCarthy when he says that PS4 Pro is not worth to be compared with. Time will tell but I think when people see what the X can do, they will want one.

Avatar image for Geocross
Geocross

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Geocross

You just can't ignore how much hypocrisy are in his words when a service like PSNow exists and they have some PS2 games running in PS4. How he wanted to evade the subject is laughable but there's two ways to look at it, whether they want to make more money from customers with PSNow or they're simply incapable of emulating the PS3 games.

Avatar image for Geocross
Geocross

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I almost bought the Lara Croft game in the spring sale so, good I didn't but... I pruchased the Lego star wars saga in steam a few weeks ago.