[QUOTE="ryangb"][QUOTE="YourChaosIsntMe"][QUOTE="ryangb"]hahaha wow that really made me laugh you know who you remind me of? edgar allen poe why? becuase he is a man, just like you, who trully was not intellegent, but used big words and good language to make himself seem like he knew what he was talking about. wanna talk science, well science would suggest that being homosexual would be a malfunction in the brains process of thinking, where normally people are attracted to the opposite sex for reproductive purposes, there is a malfunction in the brain of a homosexual becuase they are not attracted to the opposite sex the way nature inttended them to be for the purpose of human survival, just like any other species, so basically science would suggest that it is a retardation of the brain, good try you primitive little prick even with your incredible and certainly impressive nearly uncomprehendable knowledge you failed to realize that your stupid little claim above pretty much supported what i was saying. sodomy is not natural, and human biology, the subject that you are an apparent genius at, files down to two facts: men have "pee-pees" and women have "vag-vag" ever think there might be a reason for that?
ithilgore2006
That's why I told you we weren't going to discuss "science." It's(sorry but correct literary skills would probably start out by identifying what "it" is.) not "science." It's(ditto) biology and genetics. Laymen always just call it(once again),science. I don't often use my academic vernacular on these forums for obvious reasons (if everyone on this forum is so academically under you, why not point out these reasons?) . No one (that's a pretty big claim, I am sure someone of intellegence has) that is actually intelligent uses a phrase like "big words." Why not say...a complex diction? You're just getting defensive because I insulted you instead of providing you with psychological validation for your crass pseudo-intelligent arrogance. You're not even good at being irreverent.
With your incredibly inept grammar skills, I failed to realize just what the hell you were trying to say. Either way, science may say that in simplistic terms. That is my major concern in this case. That is, the dilution of scientific data for consumption by laymen. This leads you to compound limited scientic (what's scientic?) knowledge with uninformed bias. This isn't a good combination.
Well being as intelligent as you are, I assumed that you would be smart enough to understand a piece writing even if the grammar wasn't perfect but I guess I was wrong. In any case let me reiterate myself. You are ignorant. You are probably a community college grad, who thinks that a degree and using "complex diction" makes you smart. But no doubt in all actuality it is extremely probable that you are living in a one bedroom, one bathroom apartment paying rent to a fat guy in a wife beater. Basically the last paragraph said that all your previous quote did, which, let me add, has admirable grammar and incredible "complex diction", was two things. First it re-enforced my claim that gay marriage is not natural, and second it re-enforced my claim that sodomy is wrong. For an intelligent guy you really are inane. Anyway, stay hetero. goodbye.
btw i made some literary corrections for you.
Instead of assuming this and that about the guy, and blabbering on about how his good greammar doesn't make him smart, why don't you try refuting some of his arguments with some actual points? buh...buh...buh....he just uses teh big wurds. He is obviously wrong because I assume he is a community college grad who lives in a small apartment.
Didn't you know that you can only be right if you have gone to college for at least 4 years, and own a house??
[/sarcasm]
Log in to comment