[QUOTE="Camer999"]

[QUOTE="Patatopan"]

You should do indoor screenshot comparisons (or videos if you don't feel like screenshotting from those ign vids) because I personally think that cryengine 3 renders indoor areas much better than cryengine 2. I see that there isn't as much of an obvious showing of the ambient occlusion and shadowing is a little more proper. Now proove me wrong and stuff.

Patatopan

The way I see it is a combo of everysetting from veryhigh to low.

Exactly

Isn't godrays veryhigh?

You should do indoor screenshot comparisons (or videos if you don't feel like screenshotting from those ign vids) because I personally think that cryengine 3 renders indoor areas much better than cryengine 2. I see that there isn't as much of an obvious showing of the ambient occlusion and shadowing is a little more proper. Now proove me wrong and stuff.

Patatopan

The way I see it is a combo of everysetting from veryhigh to low.

Was lair ever graphics king or did GEOW kill it?

Neither let it go.

I see FM3 getting a possible 8.5 or 9.0 and GT5 a 9.0 or 9.5

I see GT5 making a bigger impact since it's GT's first next gen outting unlike Forza.

sanim02

An 8.5 fro forza would make SW explode.

[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]

[QUOTE="cowgriller"]

@ Annoyed Dragon.

even though the console version is comparable to medium pc settings with high texture setting, you gotta admit that for consoles, this game really does look good.

cowgriller

Consoles have half the Vram of PC, they won't be using the high textures.

But in regard to the way it looks I do think it is very impressive for consoles, but you will note I responded because someone challenged what I said regarding the consoles settings. You get people who have convinced themselves that their platform of choice can go head to head with a modern PC, these same people then go on to bash PC because they believe we are paying much more for only a little better of what they are getting.

When this happens I correct them with evidence, which they then decide I am a elitist hermit for doing.

Anyway it's late my end so I'm logging for the night, later.

don't worry about it. the game does look stunning for a console game but the pc version is just bad ass. can't wait to see ingame images and videos of crysis 2 for the pc. if they make the game dx11 complaint or at least add some dx 11 features (since the engine was built using dx11) it'll get me to upgrade my pc with the upcoming AMD 5x00 series.

Since DX11 is getting tessellation(probably), will it help the X360 version poly count wise?

My pc just recently died on me, so these videos of Crysis 2 on consoles are kind of helping me in the grieving process, lol. Nothing will help me with the loss of CS:S though...

RawDeal_basic

RROD IS SPREADING THOUGH ALL THE MS PLATFORMS!!!!!!! RUN!!!!

[QUOTE="AdoringFan_"]

[QUOTE="cowgriller"]

holy ----!!! i found a ban dodger. MOS GET HIM!!!!

cowgriller

Hes bringing you down to his level. Don't fall for it.

i'm not. i really want to get back to discussing cryteck engine 3.

@ Annoyed Dragon.

even though the console version is comparable to medium pc settings with high texture setting, you gotta admit that for consoles, this game really does look good.

It also can only get better. I would be a happy camper if they could get a combo of medium/high going.

I saw that on the forza forums. They were going to throw the box away, but they game it to him.

this quite entertaining i wonder how long before this guy receive the banhammer again.OPuniverse

You go on the bungie forums, don't you?