Why do a review on Early Access? It's a waste of everybody's time. Especially when one of the bads are "Plenty of glitches and bugs remain, including numerous crashes to desktop". This is...early...access....This is not excluding things like camera placement, lines of text, and even how a character is perceived in the first act. These are still typical things that get ironed out before gold release.
Why not make an article on something more constructive, like "why early access games are becoming progressively more expensive". If you're going to pay nearly full price for a game literally labeled "early access" and then proceed to complain about it's numerous glitches, that's your own fault.
@Tekarukite: The switch version is cartridge. I was only saying both because I was referring to the Wii U version and the Nintendo Switch. Like I was saying, in due time my friend, due time.
@VooDooPC: That doesn't affect the actual development of the software. Just because the disc/cartridge is being created and printed doesn't mean they can't make changes prior to release. They can put the game on the disc/cartridge and still work on polish. That's usually what day one patches are for. Also, I'm sure they'll take extra special care of Zelda since this is the only game on release. Poor reviews could impact a successful launch of their system, which I'm sure they don't want to risk. Until game developers say the game is "Gold" I usually intend to reserve my judgement prior.
@snakesglowcaps: Keep in mind this game is not released yet. They are probably still ironing out the kinks. It will either have one of two advantages compared to the Wii U. One - Smoother frame rate or two - High graphic fidelity. My money is on frame rate, but we'll see. Nintendo is pretty well known for having some well polished exclusives when it comes to their games.
Calafan's comments