Baconelite's comments

Avatar image for Baconelite
Baconelite

227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@thehawk3986: My Dualsense got drift on the right stick after about a month. I have a video on YT showing it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ci58QCwOK-0

Avatar image for Baconelite
Baconelite

227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@MDK4thewin:Fair enough. First, I do not wish to give RJ my money ever again. I don't care what he does. It will not get my money.

Second, I really liked the original trilogy and even the prequel trilogy. Before the sequels there was the expanded universe, but I never got into that. I had my own thoughts, hopes and wishes for what Luke would go on to do, after fulfilling the Skywalker prophecy. Then the sequels were announced and I got super excited to find out what happened to my favorite hero. The Force Awakens ended it on a cliff hanger and expectations were super high. But RJ decided to "subvert expectations" by ruining Luke, turning him into a sad and hopeless ghost of a former Jedi.

Luke is supposed to be the incorruptible. A beaming light of hope. He never gave up on his father. Why give up on Kylo before anything even happened?

There is a LOT wrong with that movie, but the way Luke was portrayed completely ruined Star Wars for me.

Knowing what happens, it leaves a bad taste in my mouth even watching the originals.

Avatar image for Baconelite
Baconelite

227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Yay the guy who ruined Star Wars for me is making more Star Wars.

Will not watch them or any movie he ever makes. See you in hell, RJ.

Avatar image for Baconelite
Baconelite

227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Ffs From Software just give us an official 60 fps patch.

Avatar image for Baconelite
Baconelite

227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@davillain-: Considering the usually much larger cost of a PC, it would take quite a while for it to makes sense in that context.

I agree that PC is the superior platform. It's much more flexible, has many more options, better interfacing options (keyboard&mouse or pretty much any controller). Many more games with almost limitless backwards compatibility. And yes, no extra charge for playing online.

Avatar image for Baconelite
Baconelite

227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Pyrosa: Yeah absolutely. They are smart at MS and I'm sure it's a very calculated move. I was really just speculating.

Avatar image for Baconelite
Baconelite

227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Baconelite

Microsoft could easily afford to not adjust the price, and especially at this time when people are debating which console to get. So it has to be more than just pricing and value of Xbox Live Gold.

I think this is just a push to get people to buy Game Pass Ultimate, which is an incredible deal.

However, I think it's wrong to twist the arms of people who don't want it though. Some people buy an Xbox to play like 2-3 games only, such as Fifa and Call of Duty and Game Pass Ultimate is not a good deal for them, so they are really getting screwed. And these are multi-platform games, so they can easily switch to Playstation and especially right now in between console generations, as a lot of people didn't get their next-gen console yet.

Avatar image for Baconelite
Baconelite

227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for Baconelite
Baconelite

227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@akabeast: Good for you man.

I just wanna play games and don't really care about the platform. PC + PS5 + Switch let me play all games.

Avatar image for Baconelite
Baconelite

227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@akabeast: You brought up the issue of traveling with a PC.

You said "lets see u travel with ur PC not very portable".

I was simply pointing out why that statement is incorrect.