*zoomin's forum posts

Avatar image for *zoomin
*zoomin

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 *zoomin
Member since 2004 • 103 Posts

No religion is a feel good religion as far as im concerned. Either some minority is rejected or just other non beleivers. If beleiving in god means you cant accept gay marriage or equal rights for women, for example as enforced by allah, than beleiving in god is wrong

Avatar image for *zoomin
*zoomin

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 *zoomin
Member since 2004 • 103 Posts

The problem is that horrible things are done in the name of faith. People wait for god's signs or turn to him for guidance where as regardless of whether he exists people should be solving their own problems and thanking him for every day they are able to be happy

Edit: By the way if your one of the people who pushes for evolution to stop being taught in schools then theres nothing wrong with beleiving in god but theres certainly something wrong with you, If you dont like science then dont bother learning any of it, explain physics, chemistry and why not the inner workings of life as the magic that is gods will. Just dont force us to stop learning it

Avatar image for *zoomin
*zoomin

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 *zoomin
Member since 2004 • 103 Posts
Any theater can do 3d but if they give you red and cyan glasses then youve gone to the wrong place. Special Polarised projecters are all the rage now
Avatar image for *zoomin
*zoomin

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 *zoomin
Member since 2004 • 103 Posts
That seems right, good luck
Avatar image for *zoomin
*zoomin

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 *zoomin
Member since 2004 • 103 Posts

Go ahead someone did it in the other thread and it supported the correct answer... Just consider the logic pathways because they explain everything. The probabilty that you picked the wrong door does not change because he reveals another door? why should it?

Consider this, take your coin and flip it, say you get heads, if you then decide to call both sides of the coin tails and flip it again, It does not change the fact that you initially chose heads, or in this case chose the wrong door.

Avatar image for *zoomin
*zoomin

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 *zoomin
Member since 2004 • 103 Posts

hahaha, infact you guys are really dense. Say you keep it a secret from the host the door you pick, now that you haven't vocalised it, do you not get your bonus 17%?

lol, or say, you didn't pick any door to start with, do you now not get your bonus 17%? Do I have to silently pick a door at the start so that the magical probability faries will give me a bonus when I switch?

Whats wrong with you people XD

DriftRS

If you dont reveal your door to the host then you reveal another path in the logic tree in which he reveals your door to have been wrong.. you now have a 50/50 chance between the remaining doors. Did you watch the youtube videos?

-Right door----Host Removes a Wrong Door---Swap to wrong door

-Wrong door--Host Removes a Wrong Door---Swap to right door

-Wrong door--Host Removes a Wrong Door---Swap to right door

And does this not help? There are only 3 possible pathways and 2 out of 3 times swapping will give you the right door as can be seen above.

You laugh at the probability fairy giving you an extra 17% bonus chance but in reality you are assuming that a door being revealed has magically taken away that 17% from your initial chances... the fact is they are not changed by the host

Avatar image for *zoomin
*zoomin

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 *zoomin
Member since 2004 • 103 Posts
exactly, thank you
Avatar image for *zoomin
*zoomin

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 *zoomin
Member since 2004 • 103 Posts

it has to be 50 % regardless if you switch doors because when 1 door is revealed, you know #3 is bogus, so you have door 1 and 2 .. 50% for the win, regardless if you stay with #1.. if you stay with #1 when #1 and 2 are options, theirs 50% chance. because door 3 isnt a factor anymore.. even tho it was 1/3 when you first picked, it narrows down because the 3rd is taken out of the equasion. think about it, you have 3 cups and theirs a quarter under one. you pick one cup. you put your hand on top of it. then lets say the 3rd cup is picked up and it is shown to you that theirs nothing under it.. now your selected cup and the 2nd one are left.. theirs a 50% chance the quarter is under your cup. not a 33% chance because cup 3 is eleminated.. my example is the exact same thing except i wanted to use a different example to try and make it more obvious, if the doors thing would be a little strange.nimatoad2000
If you were to repick then yes the chances would be 50/50.. but your not repicking from two, your assuming that you were originally wrong and swapping. As a logic tree you can see that the removed door changes nothing since your original choice was only 1/3 likely to have been correct

-Right door----Host Removes a Door---Swap to wrong door

-Wrong door--Host Removes a Door---Swap to right door

-Wrong door--Host Removes a Door---Swap to right door

Just because the host removes a door does not change the fact that in 2 of the three outcomes will end in you swapping to the correct door.

Avatar image for *zoomin
*zoomin

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 *zoomin
Member since 2004 • 103 Posts
Replace workout with learn guitar and I keep up with that
Avatar image for *zoomin
*zoomin

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 *zoomin
Member since 2004 • 103 Posts

Muse all the wayfriutpunch

Definately... I've certainly never heard anything quite like them