Q ??SHUD I TRADE MY PS3 SLIM 4 A NEWER SLIM DUE 2 MO MEMORY MY 160G IS CLOSE 2 BEIN USED UP OR SHUD I GIT A NEW HDD PUT IN LIKE 350 OR 500GB???
PlayStation VP of hardware marketing John Koller says Sony will support aging console as long as development scene is running; claims $270 price point for new model a result of consumers' call for value.
The PlayStation 3 isn't going away anytime soon. PlayStation VP of hardware marketing John Koller told GameSpot this week that Sony will continue to support the aging console until at least 2015, and possibly longer, provided the development scene continues to exist.
Elsewhere in the interview, Koller defended the new PS3 model's $270 price point--above the current $250 entry level unit--saying gamers have called for value, and claiming Sony is coming through with its new bundle.
He also took time to explain why Dust 514 is included in the bundle. He dodged a question regarding it being a test of the community's eagerness for free-to-play console games for this generation and the next, but said it will be "interesting to watch the adoption rate."
Koller also commented on leaked images of the new PS3 model spoiling Sony's formal announcement this week. He said leaks of this nature are not problematic for Sony (even though the same thing happened in 2009), adding that "people love talking."
The PlayStation 2 saw two redesigns. Now the PS3 is at three. Can you talk about why the increase over last gen?
There's not a particular reason of why there's one more. We look at opportunities to iterate and look at the demographics that are coming into the market. We see an opportunity right now, just with what's happening with other products and other technology items, that's more streamlined and efficient model that fits well in an entertainment center. So for us this was the right iteration. The other strategy is that…we look at the market over the past few years and saw a real rush of price points and gift cards and retail price promotions…and our consumers kept telling us "give us games, give us content." And so that's why you're seeing the Uncharted 3 250 GB bundle kick off.
"We have seen a very high interest rate from Xbox 360 consumers wanting to purchase a second console."
The new model is going for $270, and this is above the current $250 base model. We are presumably at the tail end of the PS3's life cycle, so why is the price for this entry level unit going up?
The consumers have said "give us value." And so it's a $70 consumer value when you get Uncharted 3 Game of the Year…and Dust 514 with $30 extra DLC coming in. Out of the box you get an immediate gaming experience. So we were answering the consumer call there. We feel very good about the position…and we feel the full-time bundle opportunity is the right path to take.
This new model is 25 percent smaller and 20 percent lighter. Is that correct?
Can you talk about power consumption? Is that less, too?
Power consumption is 190 watts. I think we're down a little bit. It's a more efficient unit. It has a different fan, which allowed us to shrink down the overall size of the shell.
Uncharted 3 is included in the bundle. Do you think though that there is a significant enough market that hasn't already purchased this game?
Yeah, absolutely. We're selling Uncharted 3 now with hardware. Most likely that consumer is not a PS3 owner yet. We have seen a very high interest rate from Xbox 360 consumers wanting to purchase a second console. We've held up Uncharted 3 as our flagship product over the last year and it's a good opportunity for those types of consumers to come over and own a second console in their household. We saw the same kind of thing happen in reverse during the PS2 years when a lot of PS2 consumers said they wanted to get an Xbox because of Halo and some other games. So we think the strategy works and it's a good one.
The other thing, when you look at Uncharted 3, yes, we have a very strong install base of Uncharted 3 players, but when you look at the broader PlayStation 3 base, there's still a lot who haven't played it. So even those PS3 owners who increasingly are saying they want to buy a second PS3, in all likelihood a lot of those consumers are probably going to get a game they haven't played. So we feel good. Even if they have played [Uncharted 3], they're getting Dust 514 with a lot of extra DLC.
Dust 514 certainly looks interesting. I've been tracking it. But it doesn't have the mass market appeal of something like Uncharted 3. Why did you choose to include [Dust 514] in the bundle over something else?
We wanted to provide some diversity. You have one frontline title [Uncharted 3] that clearly is one of the top games in the industry, and then you have one that is maybe a little different. It's free-to-play, and it'll be interesting to see adoption there. We received a lot of interest from our consumers about [Dust 514], so we know that there is going to be a fairly large base for it. It'll be a good model for us to see how those types of games do. Our theory is that it will do very well. We think over the next few years not only some of the frontline and new IP, but also the indie titles are set for a significant amount of growth, and we think Dust 514 is probably going to be one of those. And we thought including that would provide a really nice value, and we threw in the extra DLC to get that consumer jumpstarted.
Would you think of [Dust 514's inclusion in the bundle] as kind of a test in gamers' interest in a free- to-play console game? Those games are rumored to big in the next generation of games.
I wouldn't clarify it as a test. Although I would say that it is going to be interesting to watch the adoption rate. I won't say it's a test, because a lot of our research is pointing to Dust 514 is already set to become a big hit. It's not a test in that respect, but it's going to be interesting to see how well it performs on kind of a large level. And I think it'll do quite well.
Looking into this holiday season, Microsoft has a cheaper Xbox 360 available, and the Wii U has the buzz of a new console. Where does the new PS3 model fit in during the holiday season for Sony?
"The thing we like to communicate to our consumer base as well as to our future consumers is that you buy into the PlayStation ecosystem and you're buying into the best content in the industry. You're buying into the best place to play."
I think quite well. We are increasingly bullish on the PS3's prospects not only this year but over the next few years. I think when you look at the types of content coming to the PS3, the consumer coming in… through the 250GB Uncharted 3 bundle or…through the Assassins' Creed III 500GB model, they're getting unique content. That consumer that comes in through those avenues is going to be opened up to probably the most rich and deep gaming opportunities in the sector. When you look at what's coming to the PS3, not only this holiday, but what's coming next year…[there are] games like [Beyond: Two Souls], games like The Last of Us…a lot of third-party content coming, and a lot of first-party content that hasn't come out publicly.
A lot of great content is coming. And over the next 2-3 years, the PS3 has got an incredible lineup. That consumer coming in this fall is going to really have an opportunity to have great content and what we believe to be the best content in the industry. Yeah, we watch what the competitors do, but we don't make decisions based on what they do. We like our position.
You were just saying the PS3 has a life for the next 2-3 years. You're going to continue to support the PS3 for the next three years?
We're going to continue supporting the PS3 for the next few years. Absolutely. And we're going to continue supporting it not only that long, but as long as there is a development spigot that's running hot. And I can tell you right now, the development spigot for PS3 is very hot. A lot of great games coming. Same thing with PS2…it's kind of stuck around as that old warrior, many years after its launch. But there's still games launching for it.
What are Sony's goals for the holiday season with regards to hardware, including PS3 and PS Vita?
In general, on a qualitative approach, we are very excited about the holiday. We feel very confident about our position because of the content. When you look at the [PS3] games that are coming [they are] unique in many respects. But also with Vita, when you look at the dedicated games like [Assassin's Creed III:Liberation] or [Call of Duty: Black Ops Declassified], or Need for Speed or FIFA. The games that are coming over the next few months are just fantastic. The thing we like to communicate to our consumer base as well as to our future consumers is that you buy into the PlayStation ecosystem and you're buying into the best content in the industry. You're buying into the best place to play.
The announcement of the new PS3 model last night at TGS was not exactly a surprise. And neither was the previous slimmed down version in 2009.
Can you talk about why or how Sony has struggled to keep its hardware revisions a secret. And is this a problem?
Not a problem. And I think there's different approaches to how you release information and content. In our case, we always prefer to have the opportunity to be able to speak to all of you and to our consumers in a general meeting place like a Tokyo Game Show or an E3 or a Gamescom. So we prefer that. But with the industry being what it is, there's always people that love talking to you and your colleagues in the media. And so we can't always control that. But in general, we do try to keep it to these large events and really be able to get our message out correctly. So no, not a problem, but maybe more of a sign of the industry and how people talk.
IM ALMOST SHO ITS GONA B MO VITA PORTS 2 PS3 N MAYBE 4 DNT B SAPRIZE 2 C BO DECLASSIFED N ASSASIN LIBERATED LIKE GOW ORIGINS WAS N I PLAN TO KEEP MY PS 4SHO SO PS4 JUS WAIT IMA GIT TO U 1 DAY
this is an interesting development, and I cannot trash the Sony strategy. They have a proven console at new price points to make inroads beyond the USA, UK, Australia, Japan markets. The lower price opens up Eastern Europe much more, and many more parts of Asia. Can they succeed with a cheaper console and same price software in these territories? Perhaps we will see some lowered game prices in the future, at least on non AAA software..
Hopeful it will recive the strong support from its fellow Japanese developes like Namco Sega SNK there efforts have been poor this compared to last year
The only relevant stuff in this article for me is sony's support for ps3 till 2015. Which means we will still have great exclusives. And i m not buying a new console before that anyway
I've got a slim, and UC3. I'm interested in the ultraslim for the size and weight. Show me a bundle with 1 year of PS+ and $50 PSN and I'll get the same $100 value that "UC3+Dust" offers. You'll get a sale right there.
Ladies and gentlemen, I bring you the number #1 reason to own a PC... Longevity. A game bought on a 2000/XP machine can easily work on a Win7 machine. No need to mention that we also get to keep the servers up for a longer period of time.
P.S. thought about writing a "not a fanboy" warning since I have a 360 and PS3. But seriously, this is my major fanboy gripe with consoles.
@BRiDeath Longevity? Like upgrading a MOBO and CPU, new RAM and a new video card every 3-4 years to play new games at their optimum specs every time the tech ceiling increases... - ...opposed to buying a console that never requires hardware upgrades, with a supported library for 8 or more years?
Don't get me wrong, I admire both consoles and PC gaming, but they each have their pros and cons, and in the end it comes down to individual taste.
**most games. Win7 can't run my beloved Red Alert 2+YR. I weep for my lost love.
(RA3+Up is not the same. Don't even tell me to just play that.)
@BRiDeath the whole server ordeal is a good enough reason just in itself.
It's the GAMES that keep a console going. I thought the PS3 had so much potential. DId they lie? Nope. Everyone's too busy saying "NEXT GEN! NEXT GEN! NEXT GEN!"
They Better Continue support for PS3. I am not planing to buy Next gen for a few years after they Launch. I HAVE PLENTY of games to get to as my time is limited. STILL WHY charge the same money for newer console that SHOULD cost less money to make? Sony is not really trying to compete.
No plans on buying any of your new consoles since your current ones are failing pretty badly and still have many bugs associated with them but who cares lets not fix them and instead release brand new consoles with a whole new slew of bugs associated with them. You guys only care about making money and not about the gamer anymore.
@Strathdor That is too true. But Sony does not take it as far as they could, as other companies have taken "getting money out of their costumers".
Well that's nice but I hope they support it better than they did the PS2. A lot of the talk of the PS2 living for 10 years was a little over exaggerated here in the UK as the system stopped having anything but shovelware (and persona 4 which was cool) about midway through the 8th year. It was more dead than alive and barely supported which is too bad since it could have done more if they just released the games and they was still doing that a lot in japan.
PS3 came out before the end of it's life and got all the real attention, most likely they'll do something similar with PS4 but I think the PS3 support will still be better than the PS2 got late in it's years but then again positive thinking in the gaming sector has mostly led to disappointment recently (damn you TGS and E3 being all about casual games and phone games for the most part!).
@Sigil-otaku Too true. I hope this time they know that more people will still be playing the PS3. I hope they make it a lot easier to develop games for developers A LOT faster than with the PS2.
People again seem to think that supporting the PS3 until 2015 and beyond means that the PS4 won't be out until then, but that obviously isn't necessarily true. I also have to wholeheartedly disagree that it isn't time for a new console. The PS3 has been a good system, but it is no PS2, and even that was replaced after 6 years. The tech is aging; you shouldn't be able to beat the hell out of a console with a $500 computer.
@cheamo The tech is aging but the GAMES are the SAME. As I did back in the PSX days I still press X to jump, press shoulder trigger to fire, or press o to talk to native speaker. Yes the graphics are A LOT nicer more realistic, but the game-play, and game mechanics are the same.
Name a game and see how "different" it is to a comparable game back in the day. Halo came out in 2001 compare to Halo 4 coming out soon. IS it TOTALLY different? splinter cell, Hitman 2, ...
@Ravenlore_basic By that logic we should all still be content with our Ataris or Pong systems or something, and even though there is a lot of sequels and copied gameplay all over the place I'd say it's a pretty pessimistic view to say that there isn't any new innovation in gaming ever.
@cheamo While I like to agree with you, I'm leaning towards Sony closing down their gaming division (Sony Computer Entertainment) by 2015. 4 reasons why...
1.) There's a rumor that Gaikai said that Sony isn't making a PS4 at all.
2.) Why would they say that they're supporting the PS3 through 2015, instead of 2016, given that the PS3 launched back in 2006?
3.) They're already running into money issues, so instead of launching the newer PS3 models at something like $150 & $200, they kept the price of one model at $250, while upping the price of the other PS3 model to $300. Why? Because they need to make a profit, badly. They can't even afford to lower the price of the Vita, either, & there's also rumors saying that they can't afford to launch PS4 at all right now.
4.) If Sony waits until 2014 to launch PS4, then it may already be too late for them, because people aren't going to wait until 2014 to buy their next console when they can already buy the Wii U or the next Xbox console.
1. that is just rummer and speculation. But I do hope that Sony waits till 2015 at least till they launch PS4 as it is an expensive process. One in which they did not do well with the PS3.
2. They would launch the PS4 in 2015 and not have first party make any more games for PS3. That support would go to PS4.
3. They are seeing if they can sell the PS3 at this price. IF it does not sell then I see them lowering the price. I do wish they would have included backward compatibility as one option.
4. I do not think that waiting til 2014 or 2015 would be a huge loss. The world is now still in a huge recession and if it gets worse who is going to rush out just to buy the SAME games with better graphics. ... New IP (that is different) has been on a free fall, with only safe games that come out EACH year or TWO getting the lions share of resources.
Look at Gaming PCs using TOP of the line Graphic cards, running games at max. SURE the games look better but its the SAME GAME!!
In the end I don't think that Sony is folding the PS console. The console is profitable, and will be for some time. Games will still come out for PS3 as it has a huge base and if Sony is still supporting PS3 and people are still buying games on the PS 3 then I do not see companies not trying to sell them games.
@Shinobi120 Your points are all too valid, and it's something I've been worried could happen for a while now. I guess I'm just choosing to be an optimist for now.
Don't see what the big rush is for next gen bullshit other than blowing more money away. PS3 still has a good run as long as devs choose quality over quantity. I'd rather have games that age well over time than some enhanced graphics, high frame rate bullshit that ends up collecting dust once the hype dies down.
@PodXCOM @HipHopBeats Graphics take up a huge amount of processing power. IF there is gong to be better graphics it is going to take up more console resources. So there will be less power for AI and Physics. Sure there will be an increase but its not going to be revolutionary as no one is working on a huge leap in either AI or Physics.
@Ravenlore_basic @HipHopBeats The reason you didn't see the 'huge leap in either AI or Physics', is because everyone is working on the consoles. I've seen amazing videos that shows AI or Physics' like you never seen them before. When the PS4 comes out, it's going to be like the first time you saw Half-life 2 all over again, in 2003:
Huh? Which Source?
'Also I'm not sure what point you are trying to prove anymore. Are you saying the PS3 is no better than a 10 year old computer? Since the processor is no better than Xbox and it only has "256MB" of memory it must really crappy then. By your logic it would be struggling to play Wii games.'
Sorry, I meant the xbox 360. I guess you thought I was talking about the first xbox.
'All I said is AI and physics depend on the programming that's done. Yes at some point you need better hardware to have better AI/physics, but how many games out there right now have really pushed the limits of the PS3 hardware-wise? a handful maybe? My point is we can still see improved AI and physics on this gen yet.'
Yes, the programming is important, but 'cutting out the fat' can only do so much.
Let's say you can have 6 bad guys on screen in Killzone 2, then 3 years later, you can have 8 bad guys in Killzone 3, because of the better programming, would you say that was worth it? Not to me, because if it was only made for the high-end PC, You could have thousands of them. Don't believe me? Then look here:
And that was made in 2008! I have a lot more Tech demos if you like to see them?
My point is, programming for the PS3 is getting better, but we can have 100 times more if we move to the PS4.
Also I'm not sure what point you are trying to prove anymore. Are you saying the PS3 is no better than a 10 year old computer? Since the processor is no better than Xbox and it only has "256MB" of memory it must really crappy then. By your logic it would be struggling to play Wii games.
All I said is AI and physics depend on the programming that's done. Yes at some point you need better hardware to have better AI/physics, but how many games out there right now have really pushed the limits of the PS3 hardware-wise? a handful maybe? My point is we can still see improved AI and physics on this gen yet.
To mav_destroyer: Oy vey! long story short, it was a lie. In a controled environment, where it only does one thing, like physics, it can do better then normal processors. But in a player controled environment, it's only as good as the Xbox.
Besides, the Cell can only do 32 gigaFLOPS , but the newest graphic cards this year can do 2 teraFLOPS.
To TohouAsura: Thank you! you said exactly what was needed.
@TohouAsura @PodXCOM @HipHopBeats yes, if said console actually used a regular processor then that would make sense. Thats why we have the cell processor that can do what a high end processor can do but with less memory. If the PS3 and Xbox had normal retail processors then wouldn't be able to run even last gen's games.
Content is more important than hardware. Apple is successful because of its content-rich App store. I don't mind keep playing PS3 until 2015 or even later, as long as there are good content for the platform. New hardware can wait. Same goes for new Xbox. As for Wii U, I am not interested at all at the moment.
@HappyBB 100% agreed
@PodXCOM @HappyBB Neither of us is willing to accept the other's idea, honestly it is a matter of opinion and the only thing we can do is especulate since we are talking about the future. I'm not fool enough to think that with the advent of a new gen of consoles no innovation will come but I believe that you can still innovate in the present generation of consoles.
Also Carmack says a lot of things like "The XBOX is the best console ever" so I don't really pay attention to what he says.
But (sigh), you've exhausted everything I can say on the topic. You think the Next-gen is going to be more of the same, and I disagree.
I told you how games like From Dust and Red Faction Guerrilla could have never been made for the last-gen, and there is going to be games that can only be made for the Next-Gen. Maybe you can do more in From Dust 2?
Maybe you think it will be more of the same for the Next-Gen. But I would rather take that chance, then wait here, and hope they would try something new on their own.
Ubisoft and others said whenever a new Gen comes out, it helps them try new IP and games, and they're right. remember how PS1 and PS2 games were all about JRPGs? well, now it's all about the FPSs. The Next-Gen may be about something else.
'running at an absurd number of frames per second'
Funny, the guy who made Rage said most games for Next-Gen will still be 30fps, because of the need to make good graphics.
I agree but I think that with next generation of consoles you will be doing the exact same thing but in ultra high definition running at an absurd number of frames per second which is nice but doesn't really matter for me.
1.What do you mean boring? I want to make things. I want to grow plants and cities. I want to command armys. I want to do things that you can never do before in the Seventh Generation of consoles, or in real life. I'm sick of the games where you do nothing but take gun A and kill guy B. 2011 was the biggest number of FPS ending with a 3 I ever seen: Killzone 3, F.E.A.R. 3, Resistance 3, Gears of War 3, Battlefield 3, Uncharted 3, Modern Warfare 3, Serious Sam 3. And that's not even going into all the other FPSs that year.
2. Best wishs to you as a Father, hope your not thinking of having anymore kids: our planet can't take much more; But I hope you don't let your kids play The Last Of Us. I really didn't like the E3 trailer where the Dad murders a man, who cryed out not to be killed.
3. What I never understand is: why people never seem to want to go to the future? I'm sick of Invisible Walls, I'm sick of indestructible doors that can't be destroyed by a nuke, I'm sick of being force into a small room to shoot some bad guys, only so I can go to another small room and shoot some more, just so I can see a stupid cutscene. I AM sick of all that, I want something new, dammit! I feel like Neo who is sick of the matrix, and wants to get out, and fly into the air, and stop bullits, but can't. (sigh)
1 Yes, I am a bit of a graphic artist, but that's not why I want the Next-Gen.
2. What the BEEP?! How is The Last Of Us an innovative game?!?! It's the same old "cover-based shooter? we've been seeing for years! Same goes for the other games, but The Last Of Us doesn't even try anything new! I would never,ever call The Last Of Us "innovative". It's just a sick game.
@PodXCOM @pcty @HappyBB what you call innovative...i call boring. You must be a graphic artist or something the way you push for it so hard. lol. Innovative is Batman: Arkham Asylum , The Last Of Us, Dragons Dogma, ETC. more content in graphics or new tech does not a good game make my friend. pcty's piont is valid, PC's are way more powerful, but more of the same? why? supply and demand. theres more demand for console games then PC games. the wii is garbage to me but it IS innovative in its games. the ps3 and xbox provide a great balance between innovation and graphics. personally...id LOVE a ps4, but honestly as, a Father of 3, I cant justify the cost. so give me more content for the existing console and i'll get the next gen later. (of course ill feel differently in another 2 years but by then Im financially able to support my addiction lol)
And because I don't think you really look for the innovative games:
What do you think of them? Innovative?
@pcty @HellFyreCypher @HappyBB (sigh), The point I was trying to make is those 3 games couldn't have ever been made on Wii or PS2, and there is going to be games that can't be made for PS3, XBOX 360, or Wii U.
Most games won't let you destroy walls. What if, in the next-gen, you can destroy whatever you want? That would be innovative and new, right?
What if you can command thousands of men into battle?
What if you can command a spaceship, filled with crews, soldiers, and engineers, all ready to take your orders.
What if there was an open-world 3D game, were you can see plants and corruption very slowly growing over the land in real-time, and you can stop it from going out of control? Something like the Corruption and The Hallow from Terraria:
@PodXCOM @HellFyreCypher @HappyBB From Dust came first on Xbox Live first and it doesn't have anything related with new hardware. Alone in the Dark is everything but innovative. Red Faction Guerrilla is already out in the present generation of the consoles so what is your point posting this videos? so how does innovation depends on new hardware?
My point is: Innovation will be made, when game makers have more power to do as they want.
Content you might like…
Users who looked at this article also looked at these content items.
Avalanche Studios co-founder says developer's ambition is for action, not moments that make players cry; steampunk-style game on hold. Full Story
- Posted May 15, 2013 6:33 am PT
4A Games creative director Andrew Prokhorov thanks Jason Rubin for telling the studio's story, but says, "We deserve the ratings we get." Full Story
- Posted May 16, 2013 12:44 pm PT