I can only "woah" from the beginning to the end.
i'd have to say. Killzone 3 is a very good game. but it falls short of being different then its predecessor in terms of Weaponry.
though the new "limitation of a human barrier" (which is evident in Killzone 2 [Sluggish movement, slower character]) is downplayed in this entry. I kind of preferred the controls for Killzone 2. but the controls of Killzone 3 appeals to veteran FPS gamers (Call Of Duty-ish)
Graphic Wise. its a MAJOR improvement over Killzone 2 in alot of ways. it almost looks like a pre-rendered CG cutscene but its actually not. its deserving of an accolade for outstanding graphics on the PS3. There aren't really any lag between the auto-saves which is present in Killzone 2 (thus. Prove that Guerilla actually listened and improve)
Story starts great but gets really draggy during the later parts. and most of the story involves the bickering between 2 ISA soldiers and 2 Helghan generals. and the rest are all just point there and shoot kind of story. its a lack-lustre story which is hidden beneath the shine and glory of its gameplay.
though. end of the day. like i said in the Review for Killzone 2. Sure. Killzone is no Halo-Killer (AND COD-Killer). and don't expect Halo to be a Killzone-Killer. its made and played completely differently. so don't even start with the trolling comparison. PEACE!