Xbox Game with the WORST GRAPHICS?

Call of Duty: Finest Hours and Operation Flashpoint ElitexXMercenariOXx

Land of the Dead.... I checked out footage of it and man was it terrible.... it also recieved a 1.9 durrty2

unreal 2 hard some terrible graphicsLordGamer0001

Charlie's Angels, Bad Boys: Miami Takedown, some other gangster games that they tried to be cool making but ended up failing.Ryo_Kensen

unreal 2 hard some terrible graphicsLordGamer0001

i agree

[QUOTE="LordGamer0001"]unreal 2 hard some terrible graphicsAsher20

What part had bad graphics?

Unreal2.when u compare it with the pc ver u really get pissed off.

Panzer elite action the feilds of glory... i never forget that day that i wanted throw that **** out the window.

Resevior dogs or something like that really pissed me off the details and graphics sucks.

Metal Slug.

Hehe.
mankvill

Metal Slug.

Hehe.
mankvill

Red dead revolver, looks like a playstation game...texasfight54

totally

XIIIshoot-first

Not. Thirteen: Unique and stylish!

Red dead revolver, looks like a playstation game...texasfight54

I can tell you guys haven't played a lot of games. I'd go with:

• Turok Evolution (easily could have gone on the Dreamcast)
• Shadow the Hedgehog (extremely blurry, chunky looking, also could have gone on the dreamcast)
• Dead to Rights
• Morrowind

Medal of Honor European Assault: Everything looksed uninspired and it was almost dripping in laziness. The weapons, the environments, the tanks (seriously man, wth?). And the missions were pretty stupid too, even for a ww2 game. A German officer Endboss for every level? Come on. Using real video footage as intros almost felt like a slap in the face. If they at least pretended the game was humorous, but it took itself seriously. All in all a pretty bad game, not just because of its ugly presentation.

The only thing that looked good in this game was the main-menu and it was clunky as heck.

I got none. But, there is some games I bought and feltbad for buying it.

Land of the Dead.... I checked out footage of it and man was it terrible.... it also recieved a 1.9 durrty2

Okay, honestly, that game was fun, I liked it a lot. If you can get around the graphics, and a bit of lag, and you focus on the story a bit, it's actually pretty fun, definately not deserving of a 1.9

KOTOR 2. Ugliest game ever.

A 6 in graphics? Try a 3.

KOTOR 2. Ugliest game ever.

A 6 in graphics? Try a 3.

GodLovesDead

Yeah the 2nd kotr was terable compared to the first one and the first looked alot better in terms of grapics. But kotr2 was definatly not one of the worst games in terms of grapics. Probely charlie's angels

Both Kotor games look respectable on the pc and they have rather modest system requirements too. Its only the xbox versions that look and run so bad.

Azurik is pretty ugly. I've seen the video of a cutscene, and the environments and characters don't look good and they have no artistic value what so ever. There are games that are technically NOT good looking but they look practically amazing. Richard Burns Rally is one of them. If you examine anything in the game up close it looks fugly (cardboard trees etc), but if you just drive through the levels they look almost real. Azurik though, fails in every regard, regarding the graphics. I haven't plaed the game so I can't comment on whether it makes up for that somehow.

morrowind was pretty bad...BeeefIsGoood