[spoiler]
I'm finding it dicouraging how many people seem to hate Zant after he takes his mask off, and it upsets me to hear people saying Nintendo ruined his character. Of course, there is no right or wrong opinion, but I'd like you to see it from my point of view.
1. I highly doubt that Nintendo just made up the story as they went along. Zant's character would have always been intended to be the way it is. Everybody loved how much Midna changed, and I'm sure these changes were all planed beforehand. It's the same with Zant. He was always intended to be portrayed how he was, so it's not like they just took a badass villain and changed him at the last minute.
2. I'd also like to point out that yes, in fact Zant unmasked doesn't look very intimitating. So then, why do you think he would wear a mask then? :wink:
3. Zant, though being an actual character, can be seen as more of a symbol. Indeed, your meetings with him are few and far between, reinforcing this point. Just think, at the start, Zant is some intimidating evil force. Later, you meet him face to face, where you see first hand how powerful and evil he really is. Then, when he is unmasked you see that he is weak and mentally insane*.
Zant is a symbol of Link's obstacles, and what stands in his way, and as Link grows stronger you slowly realise that evil power is not so strong after all.
4. Remember, you're not supposed to like the villain are you? You'd hardly feel satisfied killing some awesome badass, in fact, you'd be sad to see him killed. Is this the case with Zant?
* And yes, he is insane - driven mad by his greed and desire - and not just childish, as he seems. So, Childish? No. Insane? Yes.
Well, that's how I see it. Just think of Zant as a symbol of Link's oppression, and how in reality, though it seems strong it can easily be defeated. I commend Nintendo on creating such a surprising character, which is cleverly executed in this fashion.
Â
Log in to comment