The Scouts are discussing changing their code to allow atheists to join as leaders and scouts. They have created a questionnaire to canvas opinion on this possible change to their previously staunch denial of atheists into their movement. I've previously been carping on about the scouts and their rejection of atheists in their organization while they welcome people of any and every faith (as long as they believe in God). Others, like George Pratt, are denied entry for feeling unable to take the scouting oath.
Â
The scout website says now this on the topic:
Reflecting on the revised Fundamentals
The revised Fundamentals were introduced through two articles, which appeared in the October/November and December/January issues of Scouting magazine. We've asked our members to read and reflect on these and, from today, to give feedback via a survey.
The survey asks whether the revisions mean we'll have to consider adapting other aspects of Scouting, and in particular whether we should introduce an alternative version of the Movement's Promise to accommodate young people and adults who do not have a faith. Doing this would enable the Movement to increase its diversity and embrace more communities than ever before.
Is there appetite for a new version of the Promise?
Alternative versions of the words 'Duty to God' have existed for faith groups such as Muslims, Hindus and Buddhists for more than 40 years, but this is the first time UK Scouting has consulted on an alternative version of the Promise for potential members who are atheists. Regardless of the outcome of the consultation, the existing Scout Promise will continue to be used.
As Wayne Bulpitt, UK Chief Commissioner, explains: 'We are a values-based Movement and exploring faith and religion will remain a key element of the Scouting programme. That will not change. However, throughout our 105-year history, we have continued to evolve so that we remain relevant to communities across the UK.'Â
It already seems like a done deal. But you can read and fill in the survey here, just in case!
Â
Log in to comment