Wow......they carbon copied it.......wow sony

[QUOTE="Shinobi120"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]My God! This tread is the biggest amount of butt-hurt damage control I have ever seen before! It's hilarious :lol:

"It copied smash bros" Who Cares? Everyone draws influence from something else, what's wrong with taking a great idea and improving on it or tweaking it a bit to make it your own? Smash Bros is a GREAT game, and now PlayStation is getting it's own version with the Sony Charecters, how is that a bad thing?

I'm not surprised to see Lemmings being the most jelly at this game, because they are the ONLY ones who can never have a smash-type game. Nintendo guys have enough loveable charecters to start it, Sony has enough loveable charecters to do it and improve on the original.

But Xbox doesn't have enough at all, because the cold hard truth is that outside of Halo and Gears, none of your exclusives are worth a damn, you guys don't have enough to do this kind of game.

Instead of getting mad at PlayStation you should get mad at MS for not making better games for you guys.

ShadowMoses900

Nobody's getting mad, we're laughing at Sony. If Sony's exclusives are worth a damn, everyone around this planet would be buying them, plus PS3 would be having over 100 million PS3's sold right now.

And who's jealous here? No sheep or lemming is. The game is not all that like you think it is. The characters aren't even exactly memorable to people in comparison to Nintendo's characters, & the graphics look terrible. I rather have multiplats than bareboned copies off of other's 1st/2nd party games.

Someone's jelly that they can't play this game :cool:

It must suck only having one game to look forward to this year, and it looks exactly like Halo 3, a game from 2007-2008. Now THAT game looks dull.

PS3 games do sell, just in different ways, there are more PS3 exclusives than 360 ones, especially for each genre. For PS3 FPS fans we get to choose from Killzone, Resistance, MAG, Socom, upcoming Dust ect....for 360 owners they only get to choose one, Halo, so that's all they can buy.

See PS3 exclusives sell on averge between 5-8 million, while the average 360 exclusive sells more (again because 360 owners don't have variety). However if you add up all the sales from those PS3 exclusives together they end up bringing the same amount of money (or more) as Halo does.

So you see, PS3 exclusives do make a profit, they just do it in a different way. By releasing multiple games and adding up the proftis combined, Sony is making the same amount from game sales as MS. This works great for PS3 owners because we get more options, something a Lem like you would NEVER understand.

I'm not a lemming, as I also own a Wii, plus I play more than exclusives. You speak of Sony releasing multiple games, yet, they can't even hold onto a big 3rd party exclusive like Final Fantasy XIII or to even help pull them out of the red off of what Sony's lost so far this gen. Instead of them wasting money making more exclusive games, they could've took that money & have a company create a big 3rd party exclusive for them.

Nintendo & Microsoft, however, are smarter. They realized that quality is better than quantity & don't have to shell out millions making tons of worthless exclusives in which they fail to even break even.

So get out of here with that garbage.

It looks ok and I'll wait and see at E3.

Is it a carbon copy? From the looks of it yes but hey at least it will have much better online. Plus this will make Nintnedo to make an even better Smash Bros game hopefully.

The roster is meh to me though.

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="Shinobi120"]

Nobody's getting mad, we're laughing at Sony. If Sony's exclusives are worth a damn, everyone around this planet would be buying them, plus PS3 would be having over 100 million PS3's sold right now.

And who's jealous here? No sheep or lemming is. The game is not all that like you think it is. The characters aren't even exactly memorable to people in comparison to Nintendo's characters, & the graphics look terrible. I rather have multiplats than bareboned copies off of other's 1st/2nd party games.

Shinobi120

Someone's jelly that they can't play this game :cool:

It must suck only having one game to look forward to this year, and it looks exactly like Halo 3, a game from 2007-2008. Now THAT game looks dull.

PS3 games do sell, just in different ways, there are more PS3 exclusives than 360 ones, especially for each genre. For PS3 FPS fans we get to choose from Killzone, Resistance, MAG, Socom, upcoming Dust ect....for 360 owners they only get to choose one, Halo, so that's all they can buy.

See PS3 exclusives sell on averge between 5-8 million, while the average 360 exclusive sells more (again because 360 owners don't have variety). However if you add up all the sales from those PS3 exclusives together they end up bringing the same amount of money (or more) as Halo does.

So you see, PS3 exclusives do make a profit, they just do it in a different way. By releasing multiple games and adding up the proftis combined, Sony is making the same amount from game sales as MS. This works great for PS3 owners because we get more options, something a Lem like you would NEVER understand.

I'm not a lemming, as I also own a Wii. You speak of Sony releasing multiple games, yet, they can't even hold onto a big 3rd party exclusive like Final Fantasy XIII or to even help pull them out of the red off of what Sony's lost so far this gen.

Nintendo & Microsoft, however, are smarter. They realized that quality is better than quantity & don't have to shell out millions making tons of worthless exclusives in which they fail to even break even.

[QUOTE="ispeakfact"]JELLY!!!!Tessellation

lol why are you upset? Did he strike a nerve? Guess it must be hard not being able to get a Smash game, don't worry I'm sure you have a bunch of new MULTIPLATS to play later this year. And best of all, some of them are going to be on multiple discs! :lol:

Like I said, the amount of butt-hurt damage control in this thread is hilaraious! Just admit that you want this game, I know you can't but it's not our fault. Go b!tich at MS for not giving you guys better exclusives.

It must suck only having one game to look forward to this year, and it looks exactly like Halo 3, a game from 2007-2008. Now THAT game looks dull.

ShadowMoses900

This year I have Mass Effect 3,Assassins Creed 3,Grand Theft Auto 5,Halo 4,Black Ops 2,Max Payne 3,Bioshock Infinite are games to look foreward to, ontop of others like Dead Space 3. (and not counting the Wii U + games, which im also buying, and TLOU and GoW: Ascension). Thats like $600 dollars worth of AAA videogames right there. Im hardly cutting my wrists.

Im sorry you have to willingly subject yourself to garbage (let alone spend HUNDREDS of dollars on it :lol: ) just to justify your console with a Sony "exclusive". :lol::lol::lol:

See PS3 exclusives sell on averge between 5-8 millionShadowMoses900

No one should have "copied" the first FPS and such either. I just want ONE game in each genre!

Seriously though, it looks awesome. My only concern is that some characters like Radec will be too focused on one type of combat and completely unusable up close or whatever. I am sure it will be great though.

Best of all, we know the online will actually work, unlike Brawl :P.

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="Shinobi120"]

Nobody's getting mad, we're laughing at Sony. If Sony's exclusives are worth a damn, everyone around this planet would be buying them, plus PS3 would be having over 100 million PS3's sold right now.

And who's jealous here? No sheep or lemming is. The game is not all that like you think it is. The characters aren't even exactly memorable to people in comparison to Nintendo's characters, & the graphics look terrible. I rather have multiplats than bareboned copies off of other's 1st/2nd party games.

Shinobi120

Someone's jelly that they can't play this game :cool:

It must suck only having one game to look forward to this year, and it looks exactly like Halo 3, a game from 2007-2008. Now THAT game looks dull.

PS3 games do sell, just in different ways, there are more PS3 exclusives than 360 ones, especially for each genre. For PS3 FPS fans we get to choose from Killzone, Resistance, MAG, Socom, upcoming Dust ect....for 360 owners they only get to choose one, Halo, so that's all they can buy.

See PS3 exclusives sell on averge between 5-8 million, while the average 360 exclusive sells more (again because 360 owners don't have variety). However if you add up all the sales from those PS3 exclusives together they end up bringing the same amount of money (or more) as Halo does.

So you see, PS3 exclusives do make a profit, they just do it in a different way. By releasing multiple games and adding up the proftis combined, Sony is making the same amount from game sales as MS. This works great for PS3 owners because we get more options, something a Lem like you would NEVER understand.

I'm not a lemming, as I also own a Wii, plus I play more than exclusives. You speak of Sony releasing multiple games, yet, they can't even hold onto a big 3rd party exclusive like Final Fantasy XIII or to even help pull them out of the red off of what Sony's lost so far this gen. Instead of them wasting money making more exclusive games, they could've took that money & have a company create a big 3rd party exclusive for them.

Nintendo & Microsoft, however, are smarter. They realized that quality is better than quantity & don't have to shell out millions making tons of worthless exclusives in which they fail to even break even.

So get out of here with that garbage.

Quality and quantity is better than just quality. If you don't think PS3 exclusives are quality than your case of butt-hurt damage control is bigger than I thought. Uncharted, Killzone, God of War, Infamous, Little Big Planet ect...are all high scoring and reward winning games wether you like it or not.

And like I proved in my previous post, they DO sell, they sell pretty well on their own but combine them together and the money adds up to being the same as 360 exclusives (even more in some cases) but you don't want to admit it becasue sales is the only thing you can argue about anymore, which just means that you have no more ammo.

And lol at MS being smart, closing down studios is smart? Cancelling may exclusives is smart? Dumping your fanbase for Kinect is smart? Well why yes it is because it makes them money, the ones who defend this however are not smart. They are called Lemmings for a reason.

The Truth of the matter is that the PS3 got another awesome new game and your jealous becasue you can't play it. That's all this boils down to, your just having a case of buyers remores. Like Ispeakfact says, you jelly? Yep your jelly.

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="Shinobi120"]

Nobody's getting mad, we're laughing at Sony. If Sony's exclusives are worth a damn, everyone around this planet would be buying them, plus PS3 would be having over 100 million PS3's sold right now.

And who's jealous here? No sheep or lemming is. The game is not all that like you think it is. The characters aren't even exactly memorable to people in comparison to Nintendo's characters, & the graphics look terrible. I rather have multiplats than bareboned copies off of other's 1st/2nd party games.

Shinobi120

Someone's jelly that they can't play this game :cool:

It must suck only having one game to look forward to this year, and it looks exactly like Halo 3, a game from 2007-2008. Now THAT game looks dull.

PS3 games do sell, just in different ways, there are more PS3 exclusives than 360 ones, especially for each genre. For PS3 FPS fans we get to choose from Killzone, Resistance, MAG, Socom, upcoming Dust ect....for 360 owners they only get to choose one, Halo, so that's all they can buy.

See PS3 exclusives sell on averge between 5-8 million, while the average 360 exclusive sells more (again because 360 owners don't have variety). However if you add up all the sales from those PS3 exclusives together they end up bringing the same amount of money (or more) as Halo does.

So you see, PS3 exclusives do make a profit, they just do it in a different way. By releasing multiple games and adding up the proftis combined, Sony is making the same amount from game sales as MS. This works great for PS3 owners because we get more options, something a Lem like you would NEVER understand.

I'm not a lemming, as I also own a Wii, plus I play more than exclusives. You speak of Sony releasing multiple games, yet, they can't even hold onto a big 3rd party exclusive like Final Fantasy XIII or to even help pull them out of the red off of what Sony's lost so far this gen. Instead of them wasting money making more exclusive games, they could've took that money & have a company create a big 3rd party exclusive for them.

Nintendo & Microsoft, however, are smarter. They realized that quality is better than quantity & don't have to shell out millions making tons of worthless exclusives in which they fail to even break even.

So get out of here with that garbage.

I see Lemmings use this line of logic so often, and it really makes no sense. It screams, "Bend me over and take advantage of me, Microsoft"!

So what you, and every other Lemming on this site are saying, is that you're happy with the fact that you get no exclusives because it makes more money for Microsoft? You're happy about getting no exclusives because it would cost Microsoft money to make them?

That is so asinine.

That's like saying, if you bought a television that didn't come with a remote control, you would be happy about it because the remote control would have cost the manufacturer extra, and you don't want them to have to spend the extra money, even if it is cutting corners at your expense, the consumer.

Or it would be like buying a car with no tires, and justifying it by saying, "Oh, well the tires would have cost the manufacturer more money to include, so I'm glad they didn't put any tires on my car".

In the end, you, the consumer, get nothing, and you're happy about it because the company cut corners and saved money at your expense. That's the literal definition of getting bent over and liking it.

No one should have "copied" the first FPS and such either. I just want ONE game in each genre!

Seriously though, it looks awesome. My only concern is that some characters like Radec will be too focused on one type of combat and completely unusable up close or whatever. I am sure it will be great though.

Best of all, we know the online will actually work, unlike Brawl :P.

NaveedLife

I'm just wondering about how the kill system will work. As far as I know there are no percentages or health points in the game, so it makes me wonder. And some of the stages they showed were enclosed like the LBP and God of War level, so you can't knock them off.

[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"][QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"] It's not that the 360 exclusives are bad, it's that there are none :lol: ShadowMoses900

Lol your either just a really bad troll, or someone who is having a MASSIVE case of damage control over feeling insecure about their system.

I cannot be "owned", because I am NOT last place.

I cannot "damage control", because I am NOT last place.

I cannot be "insecure" , because I am NOT last place.

and I cannot be "butthurt", because I am NOT last place.

There is NOTHING you can say or do about this.

Umad?:cool:

[QUOTE="Shinobi120"]

I'm not a lemming, as I also own a Wii, plus I play more than exclusives. You speak of Sony releasing multiple games, yet, they can't even hold onto a big 3rd party exclusive like Final Fantasy XIII or to even help pull them out of the red off of what Sony's lost so far this gen. Instead of them wasting money making more exclusive games, they could've took that money & have a company create a big 3rd party exclusive for them.

Nintendo & Microsoft, however, are smarter. They realized that quality is better than quantity & don't have to shell out millions making tons of worthless exclusives in which they fail to even break even.

So get out of here with that garbage.

ShadowMoses900

Quality and quantity is better than just quality. If you don't think PS3 exclusives are quality than your case of butt-hurt damage control is bigger than I thought. Uncharted, Killzone, God of War, Infamous, Little Big Planet ect...are all high scoring and reward winning games wether you like it or not.

And like I proved in my previous post, they DO sell, they sell pretty well on their own but combine them together and the money adds up to being the same as 360 exclusives (even more in some cases) but you don't want to admit it becasue sales is the only thing you can argue about anymore, which just means that you have no more ammo.

And lol at MS being smart, closing down studios is smart? Cancelling may exclusives is smart? Dumping your fanbase for Kinect is smart? Well why yes it is because it makes them money, the ones who defend this however are not smart. They are called Lemmings for a reason.

The Truth of the matter is that the PS3 got another awesome new game and your jealous becasue you can't play it. That's all this boils down to, your just having a case of buyers remores. Like Ispeakfact says, you jelly? Yep your jelly.

Yet Sony closed down about 2-3 studios already. That point is invalid. Butt-hurt damage control? Please. I'm not jealous of Sony's "new game," nor am I having buyer's remorse about either Wii or 360 at all. And combining all the money they made from the exclusives just to make the same amount of money off of just 1 360 exclusive is sad.

I can always go back & play Super Smash Bros. Brawl in which there's a large community & which is a much more better game.

I see Lemmings use this line of logic so often, and it really makes no sense. It screams, "Bend me over and take advantage of me, Microsoft"!

So what you, and every other Lemming on this site are saying, is that you're happy with the fact that you get no exclusives because it makes more money for Microsoft? You're happy about getting no exclusives because it would cost Microsoft money to make them?

That is so asinine.

That's like saying, if you bought a television that didn't come with a remote control, you would be happy about it because the remote control would have cost the manufacturer extra, and you don't want them to have to spend the extra money, even if it is cutting corners at your expense, the consumer.

Or it would be like buying a car with no tires, and justifying it by saying, "Oh, well the tires would have cost the manufacturer more money to include, so I'm glad they didn't put any tires on my car".

In the end, you, the consumer, get nothing, and you're happy about it because the company cut corners and saved money at your expense. That's the literal definition of getting bent over and liking it.arkephonic

LOL, like Sony never takes advantage of people or ripping people off, either...:roll:

Please. Get out of here with that. They're as evil just like Microsoft & every other company that's out there. Stop treating them like they're angels.

It must suck only having one game to look forward to this year, and it looks exactly like Halo 3, a game from 2007-2008. Now THAT game looks dull.

This year I have Mass Effect 3,Assassins Creed 3,Grand Theft Auto 5,Halo 4,Black Ops 2,Max Payne 3,Bioshock Infinite are games to look foreward to, ontop of others like Dead Space 3. (and not counting the Wii U + games, which im also buying, and TLOU and GoW: Ascension). Thats like $600 dollars worth of AAA videogames right there. Im hardly cutting my wrists.

Im sorry you have to willingly subject yourself to garbage (let alone spend HUNDREDS of dollars on it :lol: ) just to justify your console with a Sony "exclusive". :lol::lol::lol:

StrongDeadlift

Lol, every single game you listed except for Halo 4 is on PC and PS3 as well. The only difference is that you're playing the versions that require multiple discs :lol:

Have fun with that, champ!

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"] Saying it over and over again wont stop you from being last place :lol::lol::lol: Cows are not human beings :lol:StrongDeadlift

Lol your either just a really bad troll, or someone who is having a MASSIVE case of damage control over feeling insecure about their system.

I cannot be "owned", because I am NOT last place.

I cannot "damage control", because I am NOT last place.

I cannot be "insecure" , because I am NOT last place.

and I cannot be "butthurt", because I am NOT last place.

There is NOTHING you can say or do about this.

Umad?:cool:

Of course you're not in last place. You're not an Xbox 360 or a PS3. You're not part of the war.

i say leave them alone, it's not like they don't need the moolah desperately.

life is tough that way.

one day you are standing in front of the press saying "$599 us dollars :)!"

the next you are standing in front of the press saying "negative $5,999,999,999 us dollars :cry:!"

http://www.investorplace.com/2012/04/sony-doubles-its-loss-forecast-to-6-4-billion/

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"] Saying it over and over again wont stop you from being last place :lol::lol::lol: Cows are not human beings :lol:StrongDeadlift

Lol your either just a really bad troll, or someone who is having a MASSIVE case of damage control over feeling insecure about their system.

I cannot be "owned", because I am NOT last place.

I cannot "damage control", because I am NOT last place.

I cannot be "insecure" , because I am NOT last place.

and I cannot be "butthurt", because I am NOT last place.

There is NOTHING you can say or do about this.

Umad?:cool:

Lol I don't care about my system "being in last place" why would I? I'm not a share holder, "oh no my PS3 is in last place in sales, I'm so upset the world is ending, I better sell it fast just to play a system that offers very little in exclusive games all because of a small 2 million gap. The world is over I tell you"

A person who is SECURE with their system doesn't act the way you do. Your either trolling or just having massive damage control like I said, it sounds like your trying to justify your purchase.

Man, this thread brought the stupid out of everybody.drinkerofjuice

[QUOTE="NaveedLife"]

No one should have "copied" the first FPS and such either. I just want ONE game in each genre!

Seriously though, it looks awesome. My only concern is that some characters like Radec will be too focused on one type of combat and completely unusable up close or whatever. I am sure it will be great though.

Best of all, we know the online will actually work, unlike Brawl :P.

ShadowMoses900

I'm just wondering about how the kill system will work. As far as I know there are no percentages or health points in the game, so it makes me wonder. And some of the stages they showed were enclosed like the LBP and God of War level, so you can't knock them off.

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"] Saying it over and over again wont stop you from being last place :lol::lol::lol: Cows are not human beings :lol:StrongDeadlift

Lol your either just a really bad troll, or someone who is having a MASSIVE case of damage control over feeling insecure about their system.

I cannot be "owned", because I am NOT last place.

I cannot "damage control", because I am NOT last place.

I cannot be "insecure" , because I am NOT last place.

and I cannot be "butthurt", because I am NOT last place.

There is NOTHING you can say or do about this.

Umad?:cool:

Wait, are YOU an Xbox 360 yourself? You speak of the Xbox 360 in first person, and use it to justify your existence.

I would say that's the literal definition of being insecure :lol:

This thread has become so amusing.

[QUOTE="The_Pacific"]:lol: a carbon copy of Smash brothers ! $ony must really be in dire straights if they have to copy a game from the 90's now to make a buck.Anticlaxx

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="NaveedLife"]

No one should have "copied" the first FPS and such either. I just want ONE game in each genre!

Seriously though, it looks awesome. My only concern is that some characters like Radec will be too focused on one type of combat and completely unusable up close or whatever. I am sure it will be great though.

Best of all, we know the online will actually work, unlike Brawl :P.

Xaero_Gravity

I'm just wondering about how the kill system will work. As far as I know there are no percentages or health points in the game, so it makes me wonder. And some of the stages they showed were enclosed like the LBP and God of War level, so you can't knock them off.

[QUOTE="Xaero_Gravity"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

I'm just wondering about how the kill system will work. As far as I know there are no percentages or health points in the game, so it makes me wonder. And some of the stages they showed were enclosed like the LBP and God of War level, so you can't knock them off.

CajunShooter

The power-up system is something that I'm really not a fan reading about. The good thing about Smash Bros, sorry to make the comparison, is that there is such a level of customization. Choose which items become available, if any. Don't like Final Smashes? Turn them off. But this game seems to limit how deaths can happen. We haven't heard much yet and it was only announced today, but I'm worried that that could be a determining factor on whether or not I end up enjoying the game, as small of an element it may be.

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"] Saying it over and over again wont stop you from being last place :lol::lol::lol: Cows are not human beings :lol:StrongDeadlift

Lol your either just a really bad troll, or someone who is having a MASSIVE case of damage control over feeling insecure about their system.

I cannot be "owned", because I am NOT last place.

I cannot "damage control", because I am NOT last place.

I cannot be "insecure" , because I am NOT last place.

and I cannot be "butthurt", because I am NOT last place.

There is NOTHING you can say or do about this.

Umad?:cool:

[QUOTE="Xaero_Gravity"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

I'm just wondering about how the kill system will work. As far as I know there are no percentages or health points in the game, so it makes me wonder. And some of the stages they showed were enclosed like the LBP and God of War level, so you can't knock them off.

CajunShooter

Lol I don't care about my system "being in last place" why would I? I'm not a share holder, "oh no my PS3 is in last place in sales, I'm so upset the world is ending, I better sell it fast just to play a system that offers very little in exclusive games all because of a small 2 million gap. The world is over I tell you"

A person who is SECURE with their system doesn't act the way you do. Your either trolling or just having massive damage control like I said, it sounds like your trying to justify your purchase.

ShadowMoses900

Frankly, whether you "care" or not is irrelevant, so long as you ACKNOWLEGE it. Its alsoa lie, for the sole fact that you post here, and partake in the metagame just like all of us do. You just downplay it like you dont care, to disarm its use as ammo against cows. You dont get to play the "I cant lose if I dont play card" or pick which part of the metagame to obey, and which to "not care" about. :lol:

Thats like us playing a game of 21 (hooping), and me leaving the game, then wanting to join back in midgame and just pick up where I left off when I feel like it.

I am also well aware that this is all in good fun, and not to be taken seriously, but your logic of saying "oh no, the world is ending" can be applied to the fact that 360 doesnt have that many exclusives this year. Oh noes, I have to play.....gasp......the highest rated games this year! (aka. Multiplats) /wrists.

You only "dont care" because its an arguement you cant win.

[QUOTE="drinkerofjuice"]Man, this thread brought the stupid out of everybody.Xaero_Gravity

[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Lol your either just a really bad troll, or someone who is having a MASSIVE case of damage control over feeling insecure about their system.

Anticlaxx

I cannot be "owned", because I am NOT last place.

I cannot "damage control", because I am NOT last place.

I cannot be "insecure" , because I am NOT last place.

and I cannot be "butthurt", because I am NOT last place.

There is NOTHING you can say or do about this.

Umad?:cool:

[QUOTE="Anticlaxx"][QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"] Why would a last placeLOSING system make me insecure? :lol::lol::lol:

I cannot be "owned", because I am NOT last place.

I cannot "damage control", because I am NOT last place.

I cannot be "insecure" , because I am NOT last place.

and I cannot be "butthurt", because I am NOT last place.

There is NOTHING you can say or do about this.

Umad?:cool:

StrongDeadlift

Question is, does anyone actually have four PS3 controllers?

Planeforger

[QUOTE="lightleggy"][QUOTE="Willy105"] Well...the Sixaxis certainly was. But the Wiimote was always nice. It's even better with Motion+ now. Also, I own a PS3. I enjoyed games on it. I have the gamertag to prove it. But I would not say it's better than the Wii at all. Sure, the PS3 had the big budget third party games, but they were all better on PC. Willy105

The Wiimote and Nunchuck are NOT Ergonomically designed!

The Wiimote has a rectangular shape with a small curve on the back, this shape tires the grip of your hand, so holding a wiimote causes more discomfort and even hand sweating than a PS3 or 360 controller, It's not an ergonomical shape, ask ANYONE who knows about ergonomics, they will tell you rectangular remotes are NOT ergonomic at all, if you want to have an ergonomic shape for a remote then you need a cylindrical shape like that of the PS move.

Not to mention the button placement, try resting your fingers on the A and B buttons, then rest your fingers on the buttons of a DS3 or 360 controller and tell me which one felt worst and got your fingers "tired" faster? Also controllers are all about situational awareness and fast reach of buttons, things that the wiimote lack with the horirble placement of the -, + and 1 and 2 buttons in comparison to the main A and B, and also the Dpad which is a cross sticking out, again ask any ergonomics expert about which design would be more ergonomical: the wiimote dpad sticks out which makes it hard to "sweep" your fingers through it, while the DS3 dpad are just 4 arrows with a small "entrance" curve so that you dont have any problem sliding your fingers into it.

As for the nunchuck: the grip itself isn't ergonomic and the stupid "octagonal analog" design that nintendo keeps on insisting to use has already been deemed completly unergonomical in the past.

There is no other explanatio, ergonomics and wii mote shouldn't be used in the same sentence.