Is this a beta review?[QUOTE="OmegaApache"]
:lol:
They also gave the Wii U version a 4.0.
[thats from IGN's app btw]
Zero_epyon
Its fake/error on IGN's iphone app.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Is this a beta review?[QUOTE="OmegaApache"]
:lol:
They also gave the Wii U version a 4.0.
[thats from IGN's app btw]
Zero_epyon
Its fake/error on IGN's iphone app.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011-10-11-ea-responds-to-battlefield-3-esrb-rating Battlefield of Duty campaign confirmed. :U [spoiler] There is a NUKE in Paris and you shoot cops to reach the objective in time. I cannot wait for the media to find out about the cop-killing. xD [/spoiler] ActionRemix
Thats actually alright with me. There is a purpose behind it. maybe not a good one but hey its better than just shooting them for no reason. Also the fact that people shout and scream and gush blood is true to what DICE sets out to do and that is give a very physical feeling game.
Does someone care to explain to me why Russia is the enemy in the multiplayer if the campaign seems to be focusing on Iran?ActionRemix
More or less they have the same tech.
Look in fault line Ak-47's and simple cars for transport for the PLA.
That is a great question, maybe the Russians have something to do with it, but I would prefer the MEC.Why France? It's not even on the right side of Europe...and it's France! Did Russia manage to conquer most of Europe between now and 2014?[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]Does someone care to explain to me why Russia is the enemy in the multiplayer if the campaign seems to be focusing on Iran?mitu123
[QUOTE="mitu123"]That is a great question, maybe the Russians have something to do with it, but I would prefer the MEC.Why France? It's not even on the right side of Europe...and it's France! Did Russia manage to conquer most of Europe between now and 2014? I think it's simply that many people would love to play as russians, russians are cool. They also make awesome villains due to american propaganda. Villains are cool too. Americans are kind of an obligatory side these days, I suppose cause it's almost half their audience :3[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]Does someone care to explain to me why Russia is the enemy in the multiplayer if the campaign seems to be focusing on Iran?ActionRemix
Is this a beta review?[QUOTE="Zero_epyon"]
[QUOTE="OmegaApache"]
:lol:
They also gave the Wii U version a 4.0.
[thats from IGN's app btw]
OmegaApache
Its fake/error on IGN's iphone app.
Ah ok...Why France? It's not even on the right side of Europe...and it's France! Did Russia manage to conquer most of Europe between now and 2014? I think it's simply that many people would love to play as russians, russians are cool. They also make awesome villains due to american propaganda. Villains are cool too. Americans are kind of an obligatory side these days, I suppose cause it's almost half their audience :3China is a MUCH more interesting adversary to me.[QUOTE="ActionRemix"][QUOTE="mitu123"] That is a great question, maybe the Russians have something to do with it, but I would prefer the MEC.
KungfuKitten
Could there be two different hype threads or polls for PC and console versions? I'll go AAA on PC and AA on consoles.
[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"]I think it's simply that many people would love to play as russians, russians are cool. They also make awesome villains due to american propaganda. Villains are cool too. Americans are kind of an obligatory side these days, I suppose cause it's almost half their audience :3China is a MUCH more interesting adversary to me. Yeah China would be nice too. Though, there is no FPSChina, only an FPSRussia.[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]Why France? It's not even on the right side of Europe...and it's France! Did Russia manage to conquer most of Europe between now and 2014?ActionRemix
[QUOTE="Haiyama"]or if you're one of the 3+ million that bought bfbc2... u might be excited for this game....Actually BC2 sold 5 mill+.There's still hype for this game after the beta? :lol:
But seriously, if you're not playing this on PC, you don't have anything to be "hyped" about.
campzor
Where is the like button for this thread . i'm really hyped for it. 2 more weeks to go. i enjoyed the beta and miss playing it. can't wait for the release of the final product. :(
Where is the like button for this thread . i'm really hyped for it. 2 more weeks to go. i enjoyed the beta and miss playing it. can't wait for the release of the final product. :(
iwasgood2u
Here ya go
[QUOTE="iwasgood2u"]
Where is the like button for this thread . i'm really hyped for it. 2 more weeks to go. i enjoyed the beta and miss playing it. can't wait for the release of the final product. :(
seanmcloughlin
Here ya go
i clicked it but nothing happens. *more sad*Does someone care to explain to me why Russia is the enemy in the multiplayer if the campaign seems to be focusing on Iran?ActionRemixrussian accents are cool? seriously, that's the only explanation i can think of. have you ever heard their report on capturing an objective? best "f*** them" ever.
D: can't believe i hadn't noticed the new thread.BrunoBRS
haha I know. I almost did too. I came and saw the other one was locked so I came looking for this one :P
I just realised I didn't say what my hype is. Im hyping it as AAA. It seems reasonable enough. If reviewers don't compare it too much to COD, which they will unfortunately
Did we not already have a BF3 hype thread :?millerlight89
That was more like a beta hype thread :P This is the real deal. And its much better too
[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"]D: can't believe i hadn't noticed the new thread.seanmcloughlin
haha I know. I almost did too. I came and saw the other one was locked so I came looking for this one :P
I just realised I didn't say what my hype is. Im hyping it as AAA. It seems reasonable enough. If reviewers don't compare it too much to COD, which they will unfortunately
yeah i'm going AAA. seems about right. AAAA is too much, AA is not enough.HAHAHAH really fully of campers, you really need to read more news. Joystiq said the beta is absolutely nothing like the full game. And lol kill streaks.Game has great graphics but for me its never just about the graphics, this is just another FPS and i'd personally give it an 8/10. not buying on release thanks to the beta, its slow, its full of campers, no killstreaks, etc. will buy once it hit $20
finalstar2007
Amazon has BF3 download version for 30% off. Thats $42 for this game. So if you are like me and unwilling to spent $60 on a game look no further.
No matter what the PC fanboys want anyone to believe, their precious holy grail will score 8.5 on both console and PC simply because the console versions will be scored as just that...CONSOLE FPS's! The console will not and should not be downgraded because DICE massively failed or made a conscious decision not to put 64 player support in for Conquest on consoles and dont say that it cant be done, because it can if you want it to happen. That is why these guys get paid. DICE decided that they were going to make an example of Crysis 2 which made PC gamers considered a slap in the face as according to them was a "consolized P.O.S.". So DICE flat out said that BF3 was first and foremost being made for the PC. The XBOX 360 and PS3 are very, very capable of high end graphics games as Gears of War 3, Uncharted 3, Crysis 2 and RAGE can obviously show. DICE is a lazy PC developer that simply thought "they owed it to their long time fans" to make the PC version the better one! I mean seriously, how long did we wait for any DLC whatsoever for BC2?? What like 6,7, 8 months??? To think you all wonder why the Treyarch/Infinity Ward made franshise kicks the snot out of DICE games each and every year. So, you heard it here first......BF3.....PC...8.5 and BF3.....Console.....8.5!!! ShoTTyMcNaDeS
Don't be so ignorant. BF3 can't support 64 players on consoles because they simply can't handle it with such dated hardware.
was about to post it.New BF3 trailer. It is explosions http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbAl5NIFRGQ&feature
ferret-gamer
i tried to take down that tower in my last day at the beta. i guess they really did tone it down for the beta... for some reason. i mean, the tank shots weren't even leaving scratches.
[QUOTE="ShoTTyMcNaDeS"]No matter what the PC fanboys want anyone to believe, their precious holy grail will score 8.5 on both console and PC simply because the console versions will be scored as just that...CONSOLE FPS's! The console will not and should not be downgraded because DICE massively failed or made a conscious decision not to put 64 player support in for Conquest on consoles and dont say that it cant be done, because it can if you want it to happen. That is why these guys get paid. DICE decided that they were going to make an example of Crysis 2 which made PC gamers considered a slap in the face as according to them was a "consolized P.O.S.". So DICE flat out said that BF3 was first and foremost being made for the PC. The XBOX 360 and PS3 are very, very capable of high end graphics games as Gears of War 3, Uncharted 3, Crysis 2 and RAGE can obviously show. DICE is a lazy PC developer that simply thought "they owed it to their long time fans" to make the PC version the better one! I mean seriously, how long did we wait for any DLC whatsoever for BC2?? What like 6,7, 8 months??? To think you all wonder why the Treyarch/Infinity Ward made franshise kicks the snot out of DICE games each and every year. So, you heard it here first......BF3.....PC...8.5 and BF3.....Console.....8.5!!! el3m2tigre
Don't be so ignorant. BF3 can't support 64 players on consoles because they simply can't handle it with such dated hardware.
MAG says you are wrong!!! It had 256!!! Im sure DICE could have done 64 if they reeeeeeally wanted to!!! Instead they chose to favor its PC audience and gave them the so called "definitive version"!!![QUOTE="el3m2tigre"][QUOTE="ShoTTyMcNaDeS"]No matter what the PC fanboys want anyone to believe, their precious holy grail will score 8.5 on both console and PC simply because the console versions will be scored as just that...CONSOLE FPS's! The console will not and should not be downgraded because DICE massively failed or made a conscious decision not to put 64 player support in for Conquest on consoles and dont say that it cant be done, because it can if you want it to happen. That is why these guys get paid. DICE decided that they were going to make an example of Crysis 2 which made PC gamers considered a slap in the face as according to them was a "consolized P.O.S.". So DICE flat out said that BF3 was first and foremost being made for the PC. The XBOX 360 and PS3 are very, very capable of high end graphics games as Gears of War 3, Uncharted 3, Crysis 2 and RAGE can obviously show. DICE is a lazy PC developer that simply thought "they owed it to their long time fans" to make the PC version the better one! I mean seriously, how long did we wait for any DLC whatsoever for BC2?? What like 6,7, 8 months??? To think you all wonder why the Treyarch/Infinity Ward made franshise kicks the snot out of DICE games each and every year. So, you heard it here first......BF3.....PC...8.5 and BF3.....Console.....8.5!!! ShoTTyMcNaDeS
Don't be so ignorant. BF3 can't support 64 players on consoles because they simply can't handle it with such dated hardware.
MAG says you are wrong!!! It had 256!!! Im sure DICE could have done 64 if they reeeeeeally wanted to!!! Instead they chose to favor its PC audience and gave them the so called "definitive version"!!!They should! Battlefield has always been a PC franchise.
[QUOTE="el3m2tigre"][QUOTE="ShoTTyMcNaDeS"]No matter what the PC fanboys want anyone to believe, their precious holy grail will score 8.5 on both console and PC simply because the console versions will be scored as just that...CONSOLE FPS's! The console will not and should not be downgraded because DICE massively failed or made a conscious decision not to put 64 player support in for Conquest on consoles and dont say that it cant be done, because it can if you want it to happen. That is why these guys get paid. DICE decided that they were going to make an example of Crysis 2 which made PC gamers considered a slap in the face as according to them was a "consolized P.O.S.". So DICE flat out said that BF3 was first and foremost being made for the PC. The XBOX 360 and PS3 are very, very capable of high end graphics games as Gears of War 3, Uncharted 3, Crysis 2 and RAGE can obviously show. DICE is a lazy PC developer that simply thought "they owed it to their long time fans" to make the PC version the better one! I mean seriously, how long did we wait for any DLC whatsoever for BC2?? What like 6,7, 8 months??? To think you all wonder why the Treyarch/Infinity Ward made franshise kicks the snot out of DICE games each and every year. So, you heard it here first......BF3.....PC...8.5 and BF3.....Console.....8.5!!! ShoTTyMcNaDeS
Don't be so ignorant. BF3 can't support 64 players on consoles because they simply can't handle it with such dated hardware.
MAG says you are wrong!!! It had 256!!! Im sure DICE could have done 64 if they reeeeeeally wanted to!!! Instead they chose to favor its PC audience and gave them the so called "definitive version"!!! MAG also looks like crap and does nothing technically impressive.@ ActionRemix , is that map actually in bf3 (or at least the pre order version which i have paid for :D) thats one of my favourites maps in bf2!campzorIt's in the Back to Karkand expansion pack which comes out a month after release, along with Wake Island, Karkand, and Sharqi. If you preorder, you get Back to Karkand for free. Oman is my favorite Battlefield map ever!
[QUOTE="el3m2tigre"][QUOTE="ShoTTyMcNaDeS"]No matter what the PC fanboys want anyone to believe, their precious holy grail will score 8.5 on both console and PC simply because the console versions will be scored as just that...CONSOLE FPS's! The console will not and should not be downgraded because DICE massively failed or made a conscious decision not to put 64 player support in for Conquest on consoles and dont say that it cant be done, because it can if you want it to happen. That is why these guys get paid. DICE decided that they were going to make an example of Crysis 2 which made PC gamers considered a slap in the face as according to them was a "consolized P.O.S.". So DICE flat out said that BF3 was first and foremost being made for the PC. The XBOX 360 and PS3 are very, very capable of high end graphics games as Gears of War 3, Uncharted 3, Crysis 2 and RAGE can obviously show. DICE is a lazy PC developer that simply thought "they owed it to their long time fans" to make the PC version the better one! I mean seriously, how long did we wait for any DLC whatsoever for BC2?? What like 6,7, 8 months??? To think you all wonder why the Treyarch/Infinity Ward made franshise kicks the snot out of DICE games each and every year. So, you heard it here first......BF3.....PC...8.5 and BF3.....Console.....8.5!!! ShoTTyMcNaDeS
Don't be so ignorant. BF3 can't support 64 players on consoles because they simply can't handle it with such dated hardware.
MAG says you are wrong!!! It had 256!!! Im sure DICE could have done 64 if they reeeeeeally wanted to!!! Instead they chose to favor its PC audience and gave them the so called "definitive version"!!!Look at MAG, and then look at BF3. It's obvious BF3 is more demanding in hardware power, where as MAG, well, MAG isn't really a power hungry game.
[QUOTE="campzor"]@ ActionRemix , is that map actually in bf3 (or at least the pre order version which i have paid for :D) thats one of my favourites maps in bf2!ActionRemixIt's in the Back to Karkand expansion pack which comes out a month after release, along with Wake Island, Karkand, and Sharqi. If you preorder, you get Back to Karkand for free. Oman is my favorite Battlefield map ever! K good.. Na na ive already pre ordered and paid for the limited edition , i just wasnt 100% sure of all the maps included. I new karkand was in it and that was enough for me to pre order lol. Sweet cant wait to hog the AA gun on the Ship xD
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment