Sony has been owned TCHBO!!

  • 102 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for KenTa_613
KenTa_613

11702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#51 KenTa_613
Member since 2004 • 11702 Posts
Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:
Avatar image for El_Indigo
El_Indigo

4829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 El_Indigo
Member since 2005 • 4829 Posts

Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:KenTa_613

How so ?

Avatar image for 207814081221480175097949559421
207814081221480175097949559421

5384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 207814081221480175097949559421
Member since 2005 • 5384 Posts
Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:KenTa_613
What? :lol: quite the opposite. I just put a little sarcasm in the thread title :wink:
Avatar image for impatientfire
impatientfire

6684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 impatientfire
Member since 2005 • 6684 Posts
Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:KenTa_613
:lol: Check out this n00b. Next time read what's in  the thread, it's actually the Lemmings that have been owned. Sony made huge quarterly profits and Lemmings were saying that Sony would die
Avatar image for EnergyAbsorber
EnergyAbsorber

5112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 EnergyAbsorber
Member since 2005 • 5112 Posts

[QUOTE="KenTa_613"]Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:El_Indigo

How so ?

I think he was being sarcastic. Just as this topic title is sarcasm.

Avatar image for El_Indigo
El_Indigo

4829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 El_Indigo
Member since 2005 • 4829 Posts

[QUOTE="KenTa_613"]Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:impatientfire
:lol: Check out this n00b. Next time read what's in  the thread, it's actually the Lemmings that have been owned. Sony made huge quarterly profitsand Lemmings were saying that Sony would die

That's not that huge of a profit compared to what Sony used to have in the early 90  but still 1,4 + Billion in a quarter that they expected to lose 90 million is not bad

Avatar image for TML_Matus
TML_Matus

5365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 TML_Matus
Member since 2004 • 5365 Posts

[QUOTE="impatientfire"] [QUOTE="KenTa_613"]Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:El_Indigo

:lol: Check out this n00b. Next time read what's in the thread, it's actually the Lemmings that have been owned. Sony made huge quarterly profitsand Lemmings were saying that Sony would die

That's not that huge of a profit compared to what Sony used to have in the early 90 but still 1,4 + Billion in a quarter that they expected to lose 90 million is not bad



and dont forget thsi is also during the time they are reasearching the cell and creating the ps3.
Avatar image for impatientfire
impatientfire

6684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 impatientfire
Member since 2005 • 6684 Posts
[QUOTE="TML_Matus"]

[QUOTE="impatientfire"] [QUOTE="KenTa_613"]Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:El_Indigo

:lol: Check out this n00b. Next time read what's in the thread, it's actually the Lemmings that have been owned. Sony made huge quarterly profitsand Lemmings were saying that Sony would die

That's not that huge of a profit compared to what Sony used to have in the early 90 but still 1,4 + Billion in a quarter that they expected to lose 90 million is not bad



and dont forget thsi is also during the time they are reasearching the cell and creating the ps3.

true ;)
Avatar image for 207814081221480175097949559421
207814081221480175097949559421

5384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 207814081221480175097949559421
Member since 2005 • 5384 Posts
[QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="WolfensteinAR"]

[QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="WolfensteinAR"]$600 million in profits is great and all, but Microsoft had $11 billion in revenues this past quarter, so whatever.RaniK_

Sony had 17.9billion in revenue and you are talking about Microsoft gaming division here right and not Microsoft corp. cuz Xbox did not bring in much or any profit, actually M$ lost $4 billion on the Xbox.

Read post above...

We are talking about Microsoft gaming division not Microsoft corp. differentiate the two or risk self-ownage.

Really? I could've sworn you were talking about "sony" and not SCE. Fail. Nice thread title, "Sony has been owned TCHBO!!."

Self-Owned :lol:. Sony corp. and SCE both made profits check this out

"While the company's PlayStation 2 and PSP-inclusive Game division continued to do well, the biggest reasons for the company's revised annual expectations were found elsewhere. Sony credited the rosy outlook to unexpectedly strong performances from its Electronics and Financial Services divisions. Sales on the company's TVs and PCs were particularly strong"

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6143174.html

Avatar image for Heishiro
Heishiro

1604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Heishiro
Member since 2005 • 1604 Posts
The lemmings will deffinetely avoid this one :lol:
Avatar image for RaniK_
RaniK_

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 RaniK_
Member since 2004 • 10542 Posts
Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:KenTa_613
Indeed, cows are always viciously owned.
Avatar image for RaniK_
RaniK_

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 RaniK_
Member since 2004 • 10542 Posts
[QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="WolfensteinAR"]

[QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="WolfensteinAR"]$600 million in profits is great and all, but Microsoft had $11 billion in revenues this past quarter, so whatever.rickynight

Sony had 17.9billion in revenue and you are talking about Microsoft gaming division here right and not Microsoft corp. cuz Xbox did not bring in much or any profit, actually M$ lost $4 billion on the Xbox.

Read post above...

We are talking about Microsoft gaming division not Microsoft corp. differentiate the two or risk self-ownage.

Really? I could've sworn you were talking about "sony" and not SCE. Fail. Nice thread title, "Sony has been owned TCHBO!!."

Self-Owned :lol:. Sony corp. and SCE both made profits check this out

"While the company's PlayStation 2 and PSP-inclusive Game division continued to do well, the biggest reasons for the company's revised annual expectations were found elsewhere. Sony credited the rosy outlook to unexpectedly strong performances from its Electronics and Financial Services divisions. Sales on the company's TVs and PCs were particularly strong"

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6143174.html

Check the thread title, kid. The self owange is evident.
Avatar image for impatientfire
impatientfire

6684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 impatientfire
Member since 2005 • 6684 Posts
[QUOTE="KenTa_613"]Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:RaniK_
Indeed, cows are always viciously owned.

:lol: What are you doing here Ranik_? You know posting here is serious self ownage on your part? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
Avatar image for RaniK_
RaniK_

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 RaniK_
Member since 2004 • 10542 Posts
[QUOTE="impatientfire"]
[QUOTE="KenTa_613"]Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:RaniK_
Indeed, cows are always viciously owned.

:lol: What are you doing here Ranik_? You know posting here is serious self ownage on your part? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Cows really must hate me when they question why I post here. Cry.
Avatar image for impatientfire
impatientfire

6684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 impatientfire
Member since 2005 • 6684 Posts
[QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="WolfensteinAR"]

[QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="WolfensteinAR"]$600 million in profits is great and all, but Microsoft had $11 billion in revenues this past quarter, so whatever.RaniK_

Sony had 17.9billion in revenue and you are talking about Microsoft gaming division here right and not Microsoft corp. cuz Xbox did not bring in much or any profit, actually M$ lost $4 billion on the Xbox.

Read post above...

We are talking about Microsoft gaming division not Microsoft corp. differentiate the two or risk self-ownage.

Really? I could've sworn you were talking about "sony" and not SCE. Fail. Nice thread title, "Sony has been owned TCHBO!!."

Self-Owned :lol:. Sony corp. and SCE both made profits check this out

"While the company's PlayStation 2 and PSP-inclusive Game division continued to do well, the biggest reasons for the company's revised annual expectations were found elsewhere. Sony credited the rosy outlook to unexpectedly strong performances from its Electronics and Financial Services divisions. Sales on the company's TVs and PCs were particularly strong"

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6143174.html

Check the thread title, kid. The self owange is evident.

The thread title is sarcastic to own silly lemmings like you and make 'em click on the thread :lol:. Too bad you fell for the trap!
Avatar image for 207814081221480175097949559421
207814081221480175097949559421

5384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 207814081221480175097949559421
Member since 2005 • 5384 Posts
[QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="WolfensteinAR"]

[QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="WolfensteinAR"]$600 million in profits is great and all, but Microsoft had $11 billion in revenues this past quarter, so whatever.RaniK_

Sony had 17.9billion in revenue and you are talking about Microsoft gaming division here right and not Microsoft corp. cuz Xbox did not bring in much or any profit, actually M$ lost $4 billion on the Xbox.

Read post above...

We are talking about Microsoft gaming division not Microsoft corp. differentiate the two or risk self-ownage.

Really? I could've sworn you were talking about "sony" and not SCE. Fail. Nice thread title, "Sony has been owned TCHBO!!."

Self-Owned :lol:. Sony corp. and SCE both made profits check this out

"While the company's PlayStation 2 and PSP-inclusive Game division continued to do well, the biggest reasons for the company's revised annual expectations were found elsewhere. Sony credited the rosy outlook to unexpectedly strong performances from its Electronics and Financial Services divisions. Sales on the company's TVs and PCs were particularly strong"

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6143174.html

Check the thread title, kid. The self owange is evident.

:lol: Its called sarcasm kid, glad to see you fell for it.
Avatar image for RaniK_
RaniK_

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 RaniK_
Member since 2004 • 10542 Posts
[QUOTE="impatientfire"]
[QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="WolfensteinAR"]

[QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="WolfensteinAR"]$600 million in profits is great and all, but Microsoft had $11 billion in revenues this past quarter, so whatever.RaniK_

Sony had 17.9billion in revenue and you are talking about Microsoft gaming division here right and not Microsoft corp. cuz Xbox did not bring in much or any profit, actually M$ lost $4 billion on the Xbox.

Read post above...

We are talking about Microsoft gaming division not Microsoft corp. differentiate the two or risk self-ownage.

Really? I could've sworn you were talking about "sony" and not SCE. Fail. Nice thread title, "Sony has been owned TCHBO!!."

Self-Owned :lol:. Sony corp. and SCE both made profits check this out

"While the company's PlayStation 2 and PSP-inclusive Game division continued to do well, the biggest reasons for the company's revised annual expectations were found elsewhere. Sony credited the rosy outlook to unexpectedly strong performances from its Electronics and Financial Services divisions. Sales on the company's TVs and PCs were particularly strong"

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6143174.html

Check the thread title, kid. The self owange is evident.

The thread title is sarcastic to own silly lemmings like you and make 'em click on the thread :lol:. Too bad you fell for the trap!

"We are talking about Microsoft gaming division not Microsoft corp. differentiate the two or risk self-ownage." Rofl.
Avatar image for impatientfire
impatientfire

6684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 impatientfire
Member since 2005 • 6684 Posts
[QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="impatientfire"]
[QUOTE="KenTa_613"]Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:RaniK_
Indeed, cows are always viciously owned.

:lol: What are you doing here Ranik_? You know posting here is serious self ownage on your part? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Cows really must hate me when they question why I post here. Cry.

Where are your lemming brothers/ They refuse to post here 'cos they know they'll be selfownig themselves if they do. We cows pity you for posting in here. there's nothing in this thread that says anything positive about M$ and puts Sony to shame. You have been owned for posting in here, now run along :lol:
Avatar image for 207814081221480175097949559421
207814081221480175097949559421

5384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 207814081221480175097949559421
Member since 2005 • 5384 Posts
[QUOTE="KenTa_613"]Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:RaniK_
Indeed, cows are always viciously owned.

Self-Owned he was been sarcastic.
Avatar image for RaniK_
RaniK_

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 RaniK_
Member since 2004 • 10542 Posts
[QUOTE="impatientfire"] [QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="impatientfire"]
[QUOTE="KenTa_613"]Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:RaniK_
Indeed, cows are always viciously owned.

:lol: What are you doing here Ranik_? You know posting here is serious self ownage on your part? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Cows really must hate me when they question why I post here. Cry.

Where are your lemming brothers/ They refuse to post here 'cos they know they'll be selfownig themselves if they do. We cows pity you for posting in here. there's nothing in this thread that says anything positive about M$ and puts Sony to shame. You have been owned for posting in here, now run along :lol:

"We are talking about Microsoft gaming division not Microsoft corp. differentiate the two or risk self-ownage." "But, but bu teh gaming divisionz!!!11!!" Rofl, continue.
Avatar image for RaniK_
RaniK_

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 RaniK_
Member since 2004 • 10542 Posts
[QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="KenTa_613"]Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:rickynight
Indeed, cows are always viciously owned.

Self-Owned he was been sarcastic.

Self owned, my comment was not about this thread, more of a "everyday" fact. Begone, kid.
Avatar image for impatientfire
impatientfire

6684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 impatientfire
Member since 2005 • 6684 Posts
[QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="impatientfire"] [QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="impatientfire"]
[QUOTE="KenTa_613"]Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:RaniK_
Indeed, cows are always viciously owned.

:lol: What are you doing here Ranik_? You know posting here is serious self ownage on your part? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Cows really must hate me when they question why I post here. Cry.

Where are your lemming brothers/ They refuse to post here 'cos they know they'll be selfownig themselves if they do. We cows pity you for posting in here. there's nothing in this thread that says anything positive about M$ and puts Sony to shame. You have been owned for posting in here, now run along :lol:

"We are talking about Microsoft gaming division not Microsoft corp. differentiate the two or risk self-ownage." "But, but bu teh gaming divisionz!!!11!!" Rofl, continue.

:? Denial has made you dillsuional, hasn't it?
Avatar image for 207814081221480175097949559421
207814081221480175097949559421

5384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 207814081221480175097949559421
Member since 2005 • 5384 Posts
[QUOTE="impatientfire"] [QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="impatientfire"] [QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="KenTa_613"]Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:RaniK_
Indeed, cows are always viciously owned.

:lol: What are you doing here Ranik_? You know posting here is serious self ownage on your part? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Cows really must hate me when they question why I post here. Cry.

Where are your lemming brothers/ They refuse to post here 'cos they know they'll be selfownig themselves if they do. We cows pity you for posting in here. there's nothing in this thread that says anything positive about M$ and puts Sony to shame. You have been owned for posting in here, now run along :lol:

"We are talking about Microsoft gaming division not Microsoft corp. differentiate the two or risk self-ownage." "But, but bu teh gaming divisionz!!!11!!" Rofl, continue.

Self-Owned!:lol: "and you are talking about Microsoft gaming division here right and not Microsoft corp. cuz Xbox did not bring in much or any profit, actually M$ lost $4 billion on the Xbox." Quote with context next time and try to comprehend and marvel at your self ownage 
Avatar image for RaniK_
RaniK_

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 RaniK_
Member since 2004 • 10542 Posts
[QUOTE="impatientfire"] [QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="impatientfire"] [QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="impatientfire"]
[QUOTE="KenTa_613"]Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:RaniK_
Indeed, cows are always viciously owned.

:lol: What are you doing here Ranik_? You know posting here is serious self ownage on your part? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Cows really must hate me when they question why I post here. Cry.

Where are your lemming brothers/ They refuse to post here 'cos they know they'll be selfownig themselves if they do. We cows pity you for posting in here. there's nothing in this thread that says anything positive about M$ and puts Sony to shame. You have been owned for posting in here, now run along :lol:

"We are talking about Microsoft gaming division not Microsoft corp. differentiate the two or risk self-ownage." "But, but bu teh gaming divisionz!!!11!!" Rofl, continue.

:? Denial has made you dillsuional, hasn't it?

Facts hurt. You may now cry.
Avatar image for 207814081221480175097949559421
207814081221480175097949559421

5384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 207814081221480175097949559421
Member since 2005 • 5384 Posts
[QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="KenTa_613"]Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:RaniK_
Indeed, cows are always viciously owned.

Self-Owned he was been sarcastic.

Self owned, my comment was not about this thread, more of a "everyday" fact. Begone, kid.

:lol: Just be quite you dellusional noob.
Avatar image for RaniK_
RaniK_

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 RaniK_
Member since 2004 • 10542 Posts
[QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="KenTa_613"]Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:rickynight
Indeed, cows are always viciously owned.

Self-Owned he was been sarcastic.

Self owned, my comment was not about this thread, more of a "everyday" fact. Begone, kid.

:lol: Just be quite you dellusional noob.

Self owned for calling me a "noob." Sad.
Avatar image for 207814081221480175097949559421
207814081221480175097949559421

5384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 207814081221480175097949559421
Member since 2005 • 5384 Posts
[QUOTE="impatientfire"] [QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="impatientfire"] [QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="impatientfire"] [QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="KenTa_613"]Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:RaniK_
Indeed, cows are always viciously owned.

:lol: What are you doing here Ranik_? You know posting here is serious self ownage on your part? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Cows really must hate me when they question why I post here. Cry.

Where are your lemming brothers/ They refuse to post here 'cos they know they'll be selfownig themselves if they do. We cows pity you for posting in here. there's nothing in this thread that says anything positive about M$ and puts Sony to shame. You have been owned for posting in here, now run along :lol:

"We are talking about Microsoft gaming division not Microsoft corp. differentiate the two or risk self-ownage." "But, but bu teh gaming divisionz!!!11!!" Rofl, continue.

:? Denial has made you dillsuional, hasn't it?

Facts hurt. You may now cry.

Self-Owned!this is wat I said:"and you are talking about Microsoft gaming division here right and not Microsoft corp. cuz Xbox did not bring in much or any profit, actually M$ lost $4 billion on the Xbox." Quote with context next time and try tocomprehend andmarvel at your self ownage 
Avatar image for 207814081221480175097949559421
207814081221480175097949559421

5384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 207814081221480175097949559421
Member since 2005 • 5384 Posts
[QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="KenTa_613"]Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:RaniK_
Indeed, cows are always viciously owned.

Self-Owned he was been sarcastic.

Self owned, my comment was not about this thread, more of a "everyday" fact. Begone, kid.

:lol: Just be quite you dellusional noob.

Self owned for calling me a "noob." Sad.

Damage control!^^^ NOOB!.
Avatar image for RaniK_
RaniK_

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 RaniK_
Member since 2004 • 10542 Posts
[QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="impatientfire"] [QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="impatientfire"] [QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="KenTa_613"]Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:rickynight
Indeed, cows are always viciously owned.

:lol: What are you doing here Ranik_? You know posting here is serious self ownage on your part? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Cows really must hate me when they question why I post here. Cry.

Where are your lemming brothers/ They refuse to post here 'cos they know they'll be selfownig themselves if they do. We cows pity you for posting in here. there's nothing in this thread that says anything positive about M$ and puts Sony to shame. You have been owned for posting in here, now run along :lol:

"We are talking about Microsoft gaming division not Microsoft corp. differentiate the two or risk self-ownage." "But, but bu teh gaming divisionz!!!11!!" Rofl, continue.

Self-Owned!:lol: "and you are talking about Microsoft gaming division here right and not Microsoft corp. cuz Xbox did not bring in much or any profit, actually M$ lost $4 billion on the Xbox." Quote with context next time and try to comprehend and marvel at your self ownage 

Right, MS made back that profit and more in one quater alone. Continue the denial, my belittled nubcakes.
Avatar image for RaniK_
RaniK_

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 RaniK_
Member since 2004 • 10542 Posts
[QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="KenTa_613"]Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:rickynight
Indeed, cows are always viciously owned.

Self-Owned he was been sarcastic.

Self owned, my comment was not about this thread, more of a "everyday" fact. Begone, kid.

:lol: Just be quite you dellusional noob.

Self owned for calling me a "noob." Sad.

Damage control!^^^ NOOB!.

The self ownage is clearly evident. It seems I've angered the two nubs. Funny nonetheless.
Avatar image for copp3r
copp3r

1547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 copp3r
Member since 2004 • 1547 Posts
lol not even teh xflop ever saw that much profit during its first year :lol: :lol:
Avatar image for impatientfire
impatientfire

6684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 impatientfire
Member since 2005 • 6684 Posts
lol not even teh xflop ever saw that much profit during its first year :lol: :lol:copp3r
so true :lol:
Avatar image for 207814081221480175097949559421
207814081221480175097949559421

5384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 207814081221480175097949559421
Member since 2005 • 5384 Posts
[QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="KenTa_613"]Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:RaniK_
Indeed, cows are always viciously owned.

Self-Owned he was been sarcastic.

Self owned, my comment was not about this thread, more of a "everyday" fact. Begone, kid.

:lol: Just be quite you dellusional noob.

Self owned for calling me a "noob." Sad.

Damage control!^^^ NOOB!.

The self ownage is clearly evident. It seems I've angered the two nubs. Funny nonetheless.

:lol: OK.....
Avatar image for 207814081221480175097949559421
207814081221480175097949559421

5384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 207814081221480175097949559421
Member since 2005 • 5384 Posts
[QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="impatientfire"] [QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="impatientfire"] [QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="KenTa_613"]Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:RaniK_
Indeed, cows are always viciously owned.

:lol: What are you doing here Ranik_? You know posting here is serious self ownage on your part? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Cows really must hate me when they question why I post here. Cry.

Where are your lemming brothers/ They refuse to post here 'cos they know they'll be selfownig themselves if they do. We cows pity you for posting in here. there's nothing in this thread that says anything positive about M$ and puts Sony to shame. You have been owned for posting in here, now run along :lol:

"We are talking about Microsoft gaming division not Microsoft corp. differentiate the two or risk self-ownage." "But, but bu teh gaming divisionz!!!11!!" Rofl, continue.

Self-Owned!:lol: "and you are talking about Microsoft gaming division here right and not Microsoft corp. cuz Xbox did not bring in much or any profit, actually M$ lost $4 billion on the Xbox." Quote with context next time and try to comprehend and marvel at your self ownage 

Right, MS made back that profit and more in one quater alone. Continue the denial, my belittled nubcakes.

Xbox is and will continue to be a hole in Microsft's pocket.
Avatar image for McLarenAK47
McLarenAK47

14169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#85 McLarenAK47
Member since 2003 • 14169 Posts

[QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="rickynight"][QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="impatientfire"] [QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="impatientfire"] [QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="KenTa_613"]Damn, cows were owned on so many different levels. :lol:rickynight
Indeed, cows are always viciously owned.

:lol: What are you doing here Ranik_? You know posting here is serious self ownage on your part? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Cows really must hate me when they question why I post here. Cry.

Where are your lemming brothers/ They refuse to post here 'cos they know they'll be selfownig themselves if they do. We cows pity you for posting in here. there's nothing in this thread that says anything positive about M$ and puts Sony to shame. You have been owned for posting in here, now run along :lol:

"We are talking about Microsoft gaming division not Microsoft corp. differentiate the two or risk self-ownage." "But, but bu teh gaming divisionz!!!11!!" Rofl, continue.

Self-Owned!:lol: "and you are talking about Microsoft gaming division here right and not Microsoft corp. cuz Xbox did not bring in much or any profit, actually M$ lost $4 billion on the Xbox." Quote with context next time and try to comprehend and marvel at your self ownage 

Right, MS made back that profit and more in one quater alone. Continue the denial, my belittled nubcakes.

Xbox is and will continue to be a hole in Microsft's pocket.

unless they sell those 100 dollar wifi's in mass amounts

Avatar image for revo_360
revo_360

1818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#86 revo_360
Member since 2005 • 1818 Posts

[QUOTE="billyea"]Sony! Why don't you go back to making TVs! McLarenAK47

nintendo why dont u stick to handhelds.

Microsoft why don't u.... well, I guess start making more PC's or something.
Avatar image for 207814081221480175097949559421
207814081221480175097949559421

5384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 207814081221480175097949559421
Member since 2005 • 5384 Posts
[QUOTE="McLarenAK47"]

[QUOTE="billyea"]Sony! Why don't you go back to making TVs! revo_360

nintendo why dont u stick to handhelds.

Microsoft why don't u.... well, I guess start making more PC's or something.

:lol: but I though M$ made OS's.
Avatar image for hello12367890
hello12367890

977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 hello12367890
Member since 2005 • 977 Posts

[QUOTE="billyea"]Sony! Why don't you go back to making TVs! McLarenAK47

nintendo why dont u stick to handhelds.

nintendo is awesome so u shut up sony sucks everyone nos it
Avatar image for 207814081221480175097949559421
207814081221480175097949559421

5384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 207814081221480175097949559421
Member since 2005 • 5384 Posts
[QUOTE="McLarenAK47"]

[QUOTE="billyea"]Sony! Why don't you go back to making TVs! hello12367890

nintendo why dont u stick to handhelds.

nintendo is awesome so u shut up sony sucks everyone nos it

:lol: be quite nubcakes.
Avatar image for AcidTWister
AcidTWister

22981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 AcidTWister
Member since 2002 • 22981 Posts
[QUOTE="billyea"]Sony! Why don't you go back to making TVs!



Or Nintendo could go back to making "love hotels" and vacuum cleaners.

Pattern? Their products tend to include things that suck.


Avatar image for krunkmastax
krunkmastax

36027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 krunkmastax
Member since 2004 • 36027 Posts
Teh yay?
Avatar image for FrenziedRaldo24
FrenziedRaldo24

9054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 FrenziedRaldo24
Member since 2005 • 9054 Posts
[QUOTE="FrenziedRaldo24"]*Waiting for Starving-Artist and hd28guy to reply*impatientfire
*grabs potato chips and soda and patiently awaits their arrival*

They have yet to arrive:(
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#93 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
How many of you are shareholders?
Avatar image for battousai188
battousai188

2075

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 51

User Lists: 0

#94 battousai188
Member since 2004 • 2075 Posts
Playstation will always own Xbox, wanna know why??? Because Xbox only has one title anyone would by the system for and its called Halo a decent original FPS, other than that I can't think of any other game that I would buy if I had an Xbox or any of my other friends. I have 8 friends who have Xboxs, the only games they own are both Halos, one of them has another game that was kind of lame.. PS even Nintendo has a huge library or games that appeals to everyone, and several super titles that are worth buying the system for! HA MS go back to making your crappy windows and manopolizing the world, you failed at the console market go back to the whole in which you came from!
Avatar image for adrian1480
adrian1480

15033

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#95 adrian1480
Member since 2003 • 15033 Posts
[QUOTE="TechnoJunkie"] GOod news :)



Indeed.
Avatar image for onyibor
onyibor

7921

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#96 onyibor
Member since 2003 • 7921 Posts

But Teh Bankrupty, oh yea you know this will be a big movie year for Sony, Spider-Man 3 is coming out, Spider-Man was the highest grossing movie on it's opening weekend in movie history got over 200 million on the first 2 days. Spider-Man 2 was also impressive. They also have some other promising crowd drawers like "Pink Panther", "Silent Hill", "The De Vinci Code".

http://www.sonypictures.com/movies/ Big movie season for Sony coming up.

Avatar image for _______zappster
_______zappster

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 _______zappster
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts
With profits like these I couldn't see PS3 been more than 500$ wich is too bad seen as how that was the lemings only hope of 360 winning this gen .
Avatar image for spyrosklaou
spyrosklaou

2255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 spyrosklaou
Member since 2004 • 2255 Posts
at least they will get second ahead of nintendo.
Avatar image for adrian1480
adrian1480

15033

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#99 adrian1480
Member since 2003 • 15033 Posts

Sony posts strong quarterly results

"Instead of losing 10 billion yen (almost $86 million) for the year ending March 31, 2006, the company now looks to make 70 billion yen ($601 million) in net profits."

"The company's PlayStation 2 and PSP-inclusive Game division played its part in the turnaround, raking in profits more than 50 percent higher than it claimed for last year's third quarter. While PS2 sales suffered, the PSP's first holiday season in worldwide release was sufficiently strong to lift the division's profits from 44.6 billion yen ($383million) to 67.8 billion yen (almost $583 million). However, the company said those improvements were partially offset by aggressive research and development spending for the PlayStation 3."

"One interesting note to come out of the report is that PSP hardware shipments have overtaken PS2 shipments for the first time. The company shipped 6.22 million PSPs for the third quarter, but only 5.36 million PS2s."

"While the company's PlayStation 2 and PSP-inclusive Game division continued to do well, the biggest reasons for the company's revised annual expectations were found elsewhere. Sony credited the rosy outlook to unexpectedly strong performances from its Electronics and Financial Services divisions. Sales on the company's TVs and PCs were particularly strong"

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6143174.html

TLHB:o . SCE and Sony corp. both made profits.

Btw if the PSP is dead why is it shipping more than PS2? That's right, because demand is higher.

rickynight


Questions, guys:

1.) Why is this news-worthy again?

2.) We're talking about $600 million.  Are we considering that a good profit margin for a corporation the size of Sony Corp?  I guess when I look at Samsung's quarter (a company of similar size) of over 3 BILLION dollars, I'm wondering when $600 million for a company with a portfolio of companies as large as Sony's became good.

3.) I don't think people's contention was that Sony wasn't making money...it was about making *enough* money to sustain continued R&D and its many failed efforts.  Or were people saying something else?


thanks for helping me understand!
Avatar image for McLarenAK47
McLarenAK47

14169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#100 McLarenAK47
Member since 2003 • 14169 Posts
[QUOTE="rickynight"]

Sony posts strong quarterly results

"Instead of losing 10 billion yen (almost $86 million) for the year ending March 31, 2006, the company now looks to make 70 billion yen ($601 million) in net profits."

"The company's PlayStation 2 and PSP-inclusive Game division played its part in the turnaround, raking in profits more than 50 percent higher than it claimed for last year's third quarter. While PS2 sales suffered, the PSP's first holiday season in worldwide release was sufficiently strong to lift the division's profits from 44.6 billion yen ($383million) to 67.8 billion yen (almost $583 million). However, the company said those improvements were partially offset by aggressive research and development spending for the PlayStation 3."

"One interesting note to come out of the report is that PSP hardware shipments have overtaken PS2 shipments for the first time. The company shipped 6.22 million PSPs for the third quarter, but only 5.36 million PS2s."

"While the company's PlayStation 2 and PSP-inclusive Game division continued to do well, the biggest reasons for the company's revised annual expectations were found elsewhere. Sony credited the rosy outlook to unexpectedly strong performances from its Electronics and Financial Services divisions. Sales on the company's TVs and PCs were particularly strong"

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6143174.html

TLHB:o . SCE and Sony corp. both made profits.

Btw if the PSP is dead why is it shipping more than PS2? That's right, because demand is higher.

adrian1480



Questions, guys:

1.) Why is this news-worthy again?

2.) We're talking about $600 million.  Are we considering that a good profit margin for a corporation the size of Sony Corp?  I guess when I look at Samsung's quarter (a company of similar size) of over 3 BILLION dollars, I'm wondering when $600 million for a company with a portfolio of companies as large as Sony's became good.

3.) I don't think people's contention was that Sony wasn't making money...it was about making *enough* money to sustain continued R&D and its many failed efforts.  Or were people saying something else?


thanks for helping me understand!

acyually its 1.5billion in profit. but honestly look at the picture. samsung doesnt even spend half the money sony spends on R&d alone. u really cant compare the 2.