are you kidding with those screens?halo 4 looks better than the first two and the bottom one looks worse than skyrim and skyrim is HUGE and has dragons.Because it DOES look like this.why did you use the last screen as an example?it sucks.
skilfulgary
So PS3 was really more powerful.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"]
It's beautiful 0_0
Oops
skilfulgary
are you kidding with those screens?halo 4 looks better than the first two and the bottom one looks worse than skyrim and skyrim is HUGE and has dragons.
why did you use the last screen as an example?it sucks.
Sorry but no. Skyrim has nothing on uncharted 3. Ps3 isn't more powerful than the 360 by much if anything at all but when developers utilize the difference in architecture appropriately they can squeeze more out of the hardware. Problem is most devs do not do this. Also while god of war had some beautiful spots most of the game was average at best. Halo 4 and gears 3 are quite beautiful also. Uncharted tho is well done right through the whole game and happened to be very fun too which gives it a high ranking as a game overall. Honestly, next gen will be a true battle since the architecture will be so similar, we should be able to clearly determine a graphical winner but this gen was really apples to oranges. Both are good in their own way but they aren't the same.
[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"]
It's beautiful 0_0
Oopsskilfulgary
are you kidding with those screens?halo 4 looks better than the first two and the bottom one looks worse than skyrim and skyrim is HUGE and has dragons.
why did you use the last screen as an example?it sucks.
LOL you are either blind or straight up delusional Killzone 2 from 2008 alone looks much better then Halo 4[QUOTE="skilfulgary"][QUOTE="faizan_faizan"]
It's beautiful 0_0
Oopsbrofists
are you kidding with those screens?halo 4 looks better than the first two and the bottom one looks worse than skyrim and skyrim is HUGE and has dragons.
why did you use the last screen as an example?it sucks.
LOL you are either blind or straight up delusional Killzone 2 from 2008 alone looks much better then Halo 4 Nope, HALO 4 has higher resolution textures.
[QUOTE="Heirren"][QUOTE="brofists"] You know how I know your trolling? Because you said Halo 4 looks better then Killzone 2 LOL Halo 4 is nothing but bloom and over stylized - fake looking lighting, which just looks wrong, and bothers me to no endbrofistsHave you even played it? It isn't that ugly bloom you see, typical to a lot of games this gen. It looks more like genuine atmospherics. Plus, there's some enormous outdoor areas with zero of that. The game looks really good with good performance. Has there been a ps3 game that open with Halo4 level visuals? I played it, and I wasnt impressed. Thats just me being honest And by the way, Halo 4 was very linear and had many corridor moments or scripted moments etc I should instead be asking you if you have played the game lol No need to lie or over rate Halo 4 for arguements sake etc I also felt no legitimate atmosphere from Halo 4 whatsoever. It was bloom, and it was ugly I went back and played Killzone 2 just to compare, and I was suprised to see how much better Killzone 2 looked Killzone 2 looks much better in fact, looked better, played better. Killzone 2 destroys Halo 4 in every aspect. The only thing Hal has on Killzone is more b.s marketing etc You sir are an idiot, KZ2 is scripted too. Also, This doesn't even look near as PC Games, But where are teh bloomz?
And the atmosphere is pretty tight due to all the light, Also what the heck do you mean by fake lighting.
[QUOTE="OldSnake-PS3"]The Last Of Us:The Last of Us will be the best looking console game this gen by far IMO
lol @ people saying halo 4 over killzone 3
faizan_faizan
Crysis 2 on the Xbox 360: 
Wow Crysis 2 on PC is like a generation of difference.
lol 360 wouldn't get past the title screen without getting rrod.
Log in to comment