[QUOTE="MonsieurX"]Where's the science? :|lostrib
he did math. I think that's as close as we'll get
But he did it wrongThis topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="donalbane"][QUOTE="lostrib"]
Valve's average is less
percech
Half Life - 96
Half Life 2 - 96
Ep 1 -87
Ep 2 - 90
Counter Strike - 88
Portal - 90
Portal 2 - 95
TF2 - 92
Day of Defeat - 80
L4D - 89
L4D2-89
Orange Box-96
Average = 90.66
Conclusion = Valve is better
Yeah...the only problem with that list is that valve was only responsible for the HL franchise and nothing else.Doesn't really matter considering Valve employed the developers while their games were still in their concept stages.
Yeah...the only problem with that list is that valve was only responsible for the HL franchise and nothing else.[QUOTE="percech"][QUOTE="donalbane"]
Half Life - 96
Half Life 2 - 96
Ep 1 -87
Ep 2 - 90
Counter Strike - 88
Portal - 90
Portal 2 - 95
TF2 - 92
Day of Defeat - 80
L4D - 89
L4D2-89
Orange Box-96
Average = 90.66
Conclusion = Valve is better
SexyJazzCat
Doesn't really matter considering Valve employed the developers while their games were still in their concept stages.
Yes it does matter, actually. You might as well give all the credit to Sony then with the ND games. Counter-strike was a mod, Portal was a mod, Team Fortress was a mod, Day of Defeat was a mod, L4D was a mod.[QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"][QUOTE="percech"] Yeah...the only problem with that list is that valve was only responsible for the HL franchise and nothing else.percech
Doesn't really matter considering Valve employed the developers while their games were still in their concept stages.
Yes it does matter, actually. You might as well give all the credit to Sony then with the ND games. Counter-strike was a mod, Portal was a mod, Team Fortress was a mod, Day of Defeat was a mod, L4D was a mod.Difference is Valve helped develop the final product. Valve is a developer, not a publisher. Do you know what portal looked like before the developers were hired by valve? It was an entirely different game.
Yes it does matter, actually. You might as well give all the credit to Sony then with the ND games. Counter-strike was a mod, Portal was a mod, Team Fortress was a mod, Day of Defeat was a mod, L4D was a mod.[QUOTE="percech"][QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"]
Doesn't really matter considering Valve employed the developers while their games were still in their concept stages.
SexyJazzCat
Difference is Valve helped develop the final product. Valve is a developer, not a publisher. Do you know what portal looked like before the developers were hired by valve? It was an entirely different game.
They did not help out with Counter-strike, Day of Defeat or Team Fortress. All they did was prepackage them and charge people.[QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"][QUOTE="percech"] Yes it does matter, actually. You might as well give all the credit to Sony then with the ND games. Counter-strike was a mod, Portal was a mod, Team Fortress was a mod, Day of Defeat was a mod, L4D was a mod. percech
Difference is Valve helped develop the final product. Valve is a developer, not a publisher. Do you know what portal looked like before the developers were hired by valve? It was an entirely different game.
They did not help out with Counter-strike, Day of Defeat or Team Fortress. All they did was prepackage them and charge people.and gave the mod team a job. what about TF2, CS:S, CS:GO, Portal2, L4D2
They did not help out with Counter-strike, Day of Defeat or Team Fortress. All they did was prepackage them and charge people.[QUOTE="percech"][QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"]
Difference is Valve helped develop the final product. Valve is a developer, not a publisher. Do you know what portal looked like before the developers were hired by valve? It was an entirely different game.
lostrib
and gave the mod team a job. what about TF2, CS:S, CS:GO, Portal2, L4D2
That is irrelevant to the argument. The argument is whether or not Valve was responsible for these games and they're not.[QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"][QUOTE="percech"] Yes it does matter, actually. You might as well give all the credit to Sony then with the ND games. Counter-strike was a mod, Portal was a mod, Team Fortress was a mod, Day of Defeat was a mod, L4D was a mod. percech
Difference is Valve helped develop the final product. Valve is a developer, not a publisher. Do you know what portal looked like before the developers were hired by valve? It was an entirely different game.
They did not help out with Counter-strike, Day of Defeat or Team Fortress. All they did was prepackage them and charge people.Valve did indeed help with Counter-strike and DoD. Team Fortress seems to be the only one that didn't get much influence from Valve except for the engine port.
Nintendo is better.charizard1605
Nintendo EAD still is on its own league. To bad they dont try to create more new IP(not eshop titles)
[QUOTE="lostrib"]
[QUOTE="donalbane"]Let's see a comparison with Valve. donalbane
Valve's average is less
Half Life - 96
Half Life 2 - 96
Ep 1 -87
Ep 2 - 90
Counter Strike - 88
Portal - 90
Portal 2 - 95
TF2 - 92
Day of Defeat - 80
L4D - 89
L4D2-89
Orange Box-96
Average = 90.66
Conclusion = Valve is better
Waiting for the Source 2 and Half Life 3 built on top of it. With every game Valave raises the bar for gameplay while console devs like ND...:lol:
They did not help out with Counter-strike, Day of Defeat or Team Fortress. All they did was prepackage them and charge people.[QUOTE="percech"][QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"]
Difference is Valve helped develop the final product. Valve is a developer, not a publisher. Do you know what portal looked like before the developers were hired by valve? It was an entirely different game.
SexyJazzCat
Valve did indeed help with Counter-strike and DoD. Team Fortress seems to be the only one that didn't get much influence from Valve except for the engine port.
Bullshit, how did they help out with Counter-Strike exactly?[QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"][QUOTE="percech"] They did not help out with Counter-strike, Day of Defeat or Team Fortress. All they did was prepackage them and charge people.percech
Valve did indeed help with Counter-strike and DoD. Team Fortress seems to be the only one that didn't get much influence from Valve except for the engine port.
Bullshit, how did they help out with Counter-Strike exactly?Counter Strike and DOD was in development when the developers were hired by Valve. Can't tell you exactly what they did but CS's development team essentially merged with Valve corporation and their development team.
Also, just for funsies:I agree Intelligent Systems is one of my favorite developers.Intelligent Systems:
Paper Mario 93
Paper Mario: The Thousand Year Door 87
Super Paper Mario 85
Paper Mario: Sticker Star 75
Advance Wars 92
Advance Wars: Black Hole Rising 89
Advance Wars: Dual Strike 90
Advance Wars: Day of Ruin 86
Fire Emblem 87
Fire Emblem: Path of Radiance 85
Fire Emblem: The Sacred Stones 85
Fire Emblem Shadow Dragon 81
Fire Emblem Radiant Dawn 78
Fire Emblem Awakening 92
WarioWare: Mega MicroGame$! 89
WarioWare: Mega Party Game$! 78
WarioWare: Twisted 88!
WarioWare: Touched! 88
WarioWare D.I.Y 82
WarioWare: Smooth Moves 83
Mario Kart Super Circuit 93
Pokemon Puzzle League 83
Pushmo 90
Crashmo 86
Average Score: 90.6 (much higher than all companies in OP, with a substantially higher number of games as well) So yeah. Your OP is false.charizard1605
[QUOTE="TigerSuperman"]Like the fact there are games missing.Granny_SpankedLike the ones that werent scored by metacriticJak X: Combat Racing was rated by Metacritic.
Jak X has a 76 on Metacritic.
Also, just for funsies:Intelligent Systems:
Paper Mario 93
Paper Mario: The Thousand Year Door 87
Super Paper Mario 85
Paper Mario: Sticker Star 75
Advance Wars 92
Advance Wars: Black Hole Rising 89
Advance Wars: Dual Strike 90
Advance Wars: Day of Ruin 86
Fire Emblem 87
Fire Emblem: Path of Radiance 85
Fire Emblem: The Sacred Stones 85
Fire Emblem Shadow Dragon 81
Fire Emblem Radiant Dawn 78
Fire Emblem Awakening 92
WarioWare: Mega MicroGame$! 89
WarioWare: Mega Party Game$! 78
WarioWare: Twisted 88!
WarioWare: Touched! 88
WarioWare D.I.Y 82
WarioWare: Smooth Moves 83
Mario Kart Super Circuit 93
Pokemon Puzzle League 83
Pushmo 90
Crashmo 86
Average Score: 90.6 (much higher than all companies in OP, with a substantially higher number of games as well) So yeah. Your OP is false.charizard1605
Sir, the average is 86, not 90.6 ;)
[QUOTE="charizard1605"]Also, just for funsies:
Intelligent Systems:
Paper Mario 93
Paper Mario: The Thousand Year Door 87
Super Paper Mario 85
Paper Mario: Sticker Star 75
Advance Wars 92
Advance Wars: Black Hole Rising 89
Advance Wars: Dual Strike 90
Advance Wars: Day of Ruin 86
Fire Emblem 87
Fire Emblem: Path of Radiance 85
Fire Emblem: The Sacred Stones 85
Fire Emblem Shadow Dragon 81
Fire Emblem Radiant Dawn 78
Fire Emblem Awakening 92
WarioWare: Mega MicroGame$! 89
WarioWare: Mega Party Game$! 78
WarioWare: Twisted 88!
WarioWare: Touched! 88
WarioWare D.I.Y 82
WarioWare: Smooth Moves 83
Mario Kart Super Circuit 93
Pokemon Puzzle League 83
Pushmo 90
Crashmo 86
Average Score: 90.6 (much higher than all companies in OP, with a substantially higher number of games as well) So yeah. Your OP is false.SexyJazzCat
Sir, the average is 86, not 90.6 ;)
Technically the average is 82 on Metacritic but they had great games overall they only had 5 games that were just "Average" in 28 years of existence.[QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"]
[QUOTE="charizard1605"]Also, just for funsies:
Intelligent Systems:
Paper Mario 93
Paper Mario: The Thousand Year Door 87
Super Paper Mario 85
Paper Mario: Sticker Star 75
Advance Wars 92
Advance Wars: Black Hole Rising 89
Advance Wars: Dual Strike 90
Advance Wars: Day of Ruin 86
Fire Emblem 87
Fire Emblem: Path of Radiance 85
Fire Emblem: The Sacred Stones 85
Fire Emblem Shadow Dragon 81
Fire Emblem Radiant Dawn 78
Fire Emblem Awakening 92
WarioWare: Mega MicroGame$! 89
WarioWare: Mega Party Game$! 78
WarioWare: Twisted 88!
WarioWare: Touched! 88
WarioWare D.I.Y 82
WarioWare: Smooth Moves 83
Mario Kart Super Circuit 93
Pokemon Puzzle League 83
Pushmo 90
Crashmo 86
Average Score: 90.6 (much higher than all companies in OP, with a substantially higher number of games as well) So yeah. Your OP is false.Nintendo_Ownes7
Sir, the average is 86, not 90.6 ;)
Technically the average is 82 on Metacritic but they had great games overall they only had 5 games that were just "Average" in 28 years of existence.I was just counting chars list. But yea, they made Paper Mario so they have godly status in my book.
Bullshit, how did they help out with Counter-Strike exactly?[QUOTE="percech"][QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"]
Valve did indeed help with Counter-strike and DoD. Team Fortress seems to be the only one that didn't get much influence from Valve except for the engine port.
SexyJazzCat
Counter Strike and DOD was in development when the developers were hired by Valve. Can't tell you exactly what they did but CS's development team essentially merged with Valve corporation and their development team.
I can see you don't know what you're talking about. Counter-Strike was developed by college students and released as a free mod.Technically the average is 82 on Metacritic but they had great games overall they only had 5 games that were just "Average" in 28 years of existence.[QUOTE="Nintendo_Ownes7"]
[QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"]
Sir, the average is 86, not 90.6 ;)
SexyJazzCat
I was just counting chars list. But yea, they made Paper Mario so they have godly status in my book.
If you want to make a decent story for Mario, Intelligence Systems would be the go-to company to create a draft and a script.[QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"][QUOTE="Nintendo_Ownes7"]Technically the average is 82 on Metacritic but they had great games overall they only had 5 games that were just "Average" in 28 years of existence.
hiphops_savior
I was just counting chars list. But yea, they made Paper Mario so they have godly status in my book.
If you want to make a decent story for Mario, Intelligence Systems would be the go-to company to create a draft and a script. I think Alphadream or whoever makes the Mario and Luigi RPG's also do a good job.[QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"][QUOTE="percech"] Bullshit, how did they help out with Counter-Strike exactly?percech
Counter Strike and DOD was in development when the developers were hired by Valve. Can't tell you exactly what they did but CS's development team essentially merged with Valve corporation and their development team.
I can see you don't know what you're talking about. Counter-Strike was developed by college students and released as a free mod.*sigh* yes it was a free mod in beta before they teamed up with valve. After they teamed up it went through various beta stages and updates ending up as what we now know as CS 1.6
If that is so, then Bungie is greater than ND, as its average metascore it 88, one point higher than ND's 87.You can't argue with numbers.
KiZZo1
[QUOTE="ShoulderOfOrion"]turn 10 has a much better track recordNathanDrakeSwag
A track record of making games nobody buys.
The Forza Series has Sold Millions... So you just owned yourself ;) Dont come around here spreading lies,kid.you're just setting yourself up to get owned ;)Lol Bungie and Rockstar are noobs in comparison.kuraimenFacepalm* Still pretending to own a PS3,i see. :? When are you going to leave this forum? Everyone here already knows you're a Fakeboy with Zero Credibility :?
But he did it wrong[QUOTE="MonsieurX"][QUOTE="lostrib"]
he did math. I think that's as close as we'll get
lostrib
no one said it was good science
lol[QUOTE="NathanDrakeSwag"]I would say Blizzard could be next to them but after diablo 3... oh boy!! I guess you are right :) Blizzard is still above them, per metacritic average.Naughty Gods and R* are the best developers in the industry. Nobody else comes close.
AzatiS
I can see you don't know what you're talking about. Counter-Strike was developed by college students and released as a free mod.[QUOTE="percech"][QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"]
Counter Strike and DOD was in development when the developers were hired by Valve. Can't tell you exactly what they did but CS's development team essentially merged with Valve corporation and their development team.
SexyJazzCat
*sigh* yes it was a free mod in beta before they teamed up with valve. After they teamed up it went through various beta stages and updates ending up as what we now know as CS 1.6
No, Counter-strike was always meant to be a free mod but Valve noticed the increasing popularity and decided to make money off of it. It was never originally supported by Valve in anyway. Next you'll try to convince me that Dota was originally supported by Valve and it was only in beta stages during the time it was a free mod for Warcraft. You're an idiot, get your head out of your ass.[QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"][QUOTE="percech"] I can see you don't know what you're talking about. Counter-Strike was developed by college students and released as a free mod.percech
*sigh* yes it was a free mod in beta before they teamed up with valve. After they teamed up it went through various beta stages and updates ending up as what we now know as CS 1.6
No, Counter-strike was always meant to be a free mod but Valve noticed the increasing popularity and decided to make money off of it. It was never originally supported by Valve in anyway. Next you'll try to convince me that Dota was originally supported by Valve and it was only in beta stages during the time it was a free mod for Warcraft. You're an idiot, get your head out of your ass.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counter-Strike
These are all the dates of the beta stages. The developers teamed up with valve in the year 2000.
After the beta came all the updates.
And how about you stop acting like a child and grow up. You're a grown fvcking man for gods sake.
[QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"][QUOTE="percech"] Yes it does matter, actually. You might as well give all the credit to Sony then with the ND games. Counter-strike was a mod, Portal was a mod, Team Fortress was a mod, Day of Defeat was a mod, L4D was a mod. percech
Difference is Valve helped develop the final product. Valve is a developer, not a publisher. Do you know what portal looked like before the developers were hired by valve? It was an entirely different game.
They did not help out with Counter-strike, Day of Defeat or Team Fortress. All they did was prepackage them and charge people. Naw they were free HL2 mods. They eventually released Source versions of all of them, and they charged for that, but the games you site were all as free as sunshine.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment