I called it.
"Act one alone is already probably better than Gears 2's campaign in its entirety. There, I said it!"
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I called it.
"Act one alone is already probably better than Gears 2's campaign in its entirety. There, I said it!"
A random statement.
And by the looks of it, it could be. Gears 2 campaign sucked.
TrapJak
Not random, quote from someone who'se played it. It wasn't horrendus, I actually Gears 2s campaign more then the campaign of Gears of war 1. But to hear that Gears of war 3s first act is better then Gears of war 2 in its entirity in promising as hell.
[QUOTE="TrapJak"]
A random statement.
And by the looks of it, it could be. Gears 2 campaign sucked.
Bretter2200
Not random, quote from someone who'se played it. It wasn't horrendus, I actually Gears 2s campaign more then the campaign of Gears of war 1. But to hear that Gears of war 3s first act is better then Gears of war 2 in its entirity in promising as hell.
so... the rest of gears 3 could be WORSE than the entirety of gears 2 campaign... u dont know.[QUOTE="TrapJak"]
A random statement.
And by the looks of it, it could be. Gears 2 campaign sucked.
Bretter2200
Not random, quote from someone who'se played it. It wasn't horrendus, I actually Gears 2s campaign more then the campaign of Gears of war 1. But to hear that Gears of war 3s first act is better then Gears of war 2 in its entirity in promising as hell.
GTA4's campaign is suppose to be than San Andreas.I'll wait till the official release before I jump into it.
[QUOTE="Bretter2200"][QUOTE="TrapJak"]
A random statement.
And by the looks of it, it could be. Gears 2 campaign sucked.
campzor
Not random, quote from someone who'se played it. It wasn't horrendus, I actually Gears 2s campaign more then the campaign of Gears of war 1. But to hear that Gears of war 3s first act is better then Gears of war 2 in its entirity in promising as hell.
so... the rest of gears 3 could be WORSE than the entirety of gears 2 campaign... u dont know.Actually, from what I've played on my jtag. Things kept getting better from the first act to the final fifth. I do know.
Gears of war 1 and 2 had terrible campaigns so thats not saying much
toast_burner
They both scored 9.5 on IGN which Gears 2 did alone since the MP was not so working on launch.
Oh yes, please keep announcing you played a pirated version of a game :lol:.
TrapJak
Proof I haven't? I can list every major spoiler and have all cinimatics right on my computer. If you wish, I can give you them. Other then that I don't have much viable evidence.
[QUOTE="TrapJak"]
Oh yes, please keep announcing you played a pirated version of a game :lol:.
Bretter2200
Proof I haven't? I can list every major spoiler and have all cinimatics right on my computer. If you wish, I can give you them. Other then that I don't have much viable evidence.
Thats not the point.You played a pirated game. You honestly couldnt have waited until the real game came out?
Thats not the point.[QUOTE="TrapJak"]
[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]
Proof I haven't? I can list every major spoiler and have all cinimatics right on my computer. If you wish, I can give you them. Other then that I don't have much viable evidence.
Bretter2200
You played a pirated game. You honestly couldnt have waited until the real game came out?
I wished to confirm if the game would be good or not before I buy it and hype it. Honestly, at the time I wasn't very hyped for it after Gears of war 2. But I'm simply confirming the game is going to be very good.
Since you have played the whole game, right?
How would you rate the story?
[QUOTE="toast_burner"]Gears 1 was better than Gears 2, but yea, this statement doesn't really amount to much.Gears of war 1 and 2 had terrible campaigns so thats not saying much
Heil68
Does actually, it assists people who want to buy the game. The beta was no where near a failure. But people still believed Gears was always renound for its multi-player aspect rather then its campaign. Which is totally not true. If a single act is superior to the entire previous game when its previous game scored a 9.5 alone with its campaign then you better be ready for a storm of a suprise when the game comes out.
[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]
[QUOTE="TrapJak"]Thats not the point.
You played a pirated game. You honestly couldnt have waited until the real game came out?
GuNsbl4ziN
I wished to confirm if the game would be good or not before I buy it and hype it. Honestly, at the time I wasn't very hyped for it after Gears of war 2. But I'm simply confirming the game is going to be very good.
Since you have played the whole game, right?
How would you rate the story?
Great, about the quality of the books. Far superior to that of Gears 2 due to Karen Travis part in it.
Oh and I can also confirm that graphically, Gears in no way will fail. Some missions in particular "Brothers to the end", 'Reckoning", "Ashes" and "Unbreakable" where possibly the best graphics on console I've ever played through.
[QUOTE="toast_burner"]
Gears of war 1 and 2 had terrible campaigns so thats not saying much
Bretter2200
They both scored 9.5 on IGN which Gears 2 did alone since the MP was not so working on launch.
Its IGN. What did you expect?
[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]
[QUOTE="toast_burner"]
Gears of war 1 and 2 had terrible campaigns so thats not saying much
kris9031998
They both scored 9.5 on IGN which Gears 2 did alone since the MP was not so working on launch.
Its IGN. What did you expect?
Still a game that's AAA topped one a single section of the campaign.
I hope so i got big hopes for Gears 3 just as long as the ending is better as well i'll be happy, i can find enjoyment in the worst stories :DJohnF111
Then you're going to hate Gears of war 3.
[QUOTE="kris9031998"]
[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]
They both scored 9.5 on IGN which Gears 2 did alone since the MP was not so working on launch.
Bretter2200
Its IGN. What did you expect?
Still a game that's AAA topped one a single section of the campaign.
The campaign wasnt even that good....[QUOTE="toast_burner"]
Gears of war 1 and 2 had terrible campaigns so thats not saying much
Bretter2200
They both scored 9.5 on IGN which Gears 2 did alone since the MP was not so working on launch.
So IGN gave it a high score, it still sucked[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]
[QUOTE="toast_burner"]
Gears of war 1 and 2 had terrible campaigns so thats not saying much
toast_burner
They both scored 9.5 on IGN which Gears 2 did alone since the MP was not so working on launch.
So IGN gave it a high score, it still suckedWell, it's just kind of confirmation that Gears 3 campaign is superior to its previous ones. They fixed every thing from two including the boss fights, which where astonding.
So IGN gave it a high score, it still sucked[QUOTE="toast_burner"]
[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]
They both scored 9.5 on IGN which Gears 2 did alone since the MP was not so working on launch.
Bretter2200
Well, it's just kind of confirmation that Gears 3 campaign is superior to its previous ones. They fixed every thing from two including the boss fights, which where astonding.
Being superior to something that's bad isn't saying much at all.[QUOTE="Bretter2200"][QUOTE="toast_burner"]So IGN gave it a high score, it still sucked
toast_burner
Well, it's just kind of confirmation that Gears 3 campaign is superior to its previous ones. They fixed every thing from two including the boss fights, which where astonding.
Being superior to something that's bad isn't saying much at all. Yeah, its like the Angry Video game nerd once said "The **** i took today was better than the **** i took yesterday, but its still ****"[QUOTE="Bretter2200"][QUOTE="toast_burner"]So IGN gave it a high score, it still sucked
toast_burner
Well, it's just kind of confirmation that Gears 3 campaign is superior to its previous ones. They fixed every thing from two including the boss fights, which where astonding.
Being superior to something that's bad isn't saying much at all.Honestly, Gears 2 campaign wasn't horrendus. Other wise it wouldn't have scored a 9.0 on game spot. And saying that Gears of war 3s single act is superior to all of Gears of war 2 does say quite a bit. And it's exactly what we've wished for.
Being superior to something that's bad isn't saying much at all.[QUOTE="toast_burner"][QUOTE="Bretter2200"]
Well, it's just kind of confirmation that Gears 3 campaign is superior to its previous ones. They fixed every thing from two including the boss fights, which where astonding.
Bretter2200
Honestly, Gears 2 campaign wasn't horrendus. Other wise it wouldn't have scored a 9.0 on game spot. And saying that Gears of war 3s single act is superior to all of Gears of war 2 does say quite a bit. And it's exactly what we've wished for.
Theres a reason why Gears is known for its MP... its SP is nowhere near good.[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]
[QUOTE="toast_burner"] Being superior to something that's bad isn't saying much at all. TrapJak
Honestly, Gears 2 campaign wasn't horrendus. Other wise it wouldn't have scored a 9.0 on game spot. And saying that Gears of war 3s single act is superior to all of Gears of war 2 does say quite a bit. And it's exactly what we've wished for.
Theres a reason why Gears is known for its MP... its SP is nowhere near good.What? In Gears of war 1 the pinnicle of the game was single player. Multi-player has always been a joke up until the beta. I don't know where people got that notion. I still player Gears of war 1 co-op with friends. It was outstanding. Gears of war 2s single player wasn't horrendus but lacked the fun Gears 1 had. And Gears 3 campaign blows even one out of the water.
Like others have said... saying Gears 3 has a better campaign than Gear 1 or 2 isn't saying much. Both of those games had mediocre campaigns at best. Killzone 3 had missions that I thought were better than the entire Killzone 2 campaign, but either way they're still only mediocre to okay campaigns.
IGN gave Halo ODST a 9 out of 10 for a 5 hour campaign and a repackaged Halo 3 multiplayer. Halo, Gears, Killzone and Resistance all get scored way beyond what they deserve. All of them have boring campaigns with good to great multiplayer. That is all they have.
Ok and Act one of Uncharted 3 alone is already probably better than whole Gears of war franchise campaign in its entirety.
aroxx_ab
There's a reason I'm getting Gears of war 3, and not Uncharted 3. If Uncharted 3 turns out better then two, I might buy it.
Like others have said... saying Gears 3 has a better campaign than Gear 1 or 2 isn't saying much. Both of those games had mediocre campaigns at best. Killzone 3 had missions that I thought were better than the entire Killzone 2 campaign, but either way they're still only mediocre to okay campaigns.
IGN gave Halo ODST a 9 out of 10 for a 5 hour campaign and a repackaged Halo 3 multiplayer. Halo, Gears, Killzone and Resistance all get scored way beyond what they deserve. All of them have boring campaigns with good to great multiplayer. That is all they have.
contracts420
I already know, but that's saying it's above average.
Theres a reason why Gears is known for its MP... its SP is nowhere near good.[QUOTE="TrapJak"]
[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]
Honestly, Gears 2 campaign wasn't horrendus. Other wise it wouldn't have scored a 9.0 on game spot. And saying that Gears of war 3s single act is superior to all of Gears of war 2 does say quite a bit. And it's exactly what we've wished for.
Bretter2200
What? In Gears of war 1 the pinnicle of the game was single player. Multi-player has always been a joke up until the beta. I don't know where people got that notion. I still player Gears of war 1 co-op with friends. It was outstanding. Gears of war 2s single player wasn't horrendus but lacked the fun Gears 1 had. And Gears 3 campaign blows even one out of the water.
TrapJak is right. Gears is known for it's multiplayer. It's SP is nothing to boast about.
I loved gears campaign, i really did! I don't play it's mp. the first got 9.6, not for it's mp cause that wasn't very good! TC, how long is the game and how do you think it will score?vlens
Just campaign alone? 9.8.
But with all the additional features I cautiously say a 9.9 or 10.
[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]
[QUOTE="TrapJak"]Theres a reason why Gears is known for its MP... its SP is nowhere near good.
contracts420
What? In Gears of war 1 the pinnicle of the game was single player. Multi-player has always been a joke up until the beta. I don't know where people got that notion. I still player Gears of war 1 co-op with friends. It was outstanding. Gears of war 2s single player wasn't horrendus but lacked the fun Gears 1 had. And Gears 3 campaign blows even one out of the water.
TrapJak is right. Gears is known for it's multiplayer. It's SP is nothing to boast about.
Gears of war 1 had a phenominal single player. Gears of war 2 had a medicore one. And Gears of war 3 kills Gears of war 1s single player.
[QUOTE="vlens"]I loved gears campaign, i really did! I don't play it's mp. the first got 9.6, not for it's mp cause that wasn't very good! TC, how long is the game and how do you think it will score?Bretter2200
Just campaign alone? 9.8.
But with all the additional features I cautiously say a 9.9 or 10.
[QUOTE="Bretter2200"][QUOTE="vlens"]I loved gears campaign, i really did! I don't play it's mp. the first got 9.6, not for it's mp cause that wasn't very good! TC, how long is the game and how do you think it will score?vlens
Just campaign alone? 9.8.
But with all the additional features I cautiously say a 9.9 or 10.
Hence the reason I'm hyping the game.
[QUOTE="contracts420"]
[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]
What? In Gears of war 1 the pinnicle of the game was single player. Multi-player has always been a joke up until the beta. I don't know where people got that notion. I still player Gears of war 1 co-op with friends. It was outstanding. Gears of war 2s single player wasn't horrendus but lacked the fun Gears 1 had. And Gears 3 campaign blows even one out of the water.
Bretter2200
TrapJak is right. Gears is known for it's multiplayer. It's SP is nothing to boast about.
Gears of war 1 had a phenominal single player. Gears of war 2 had a medicore one. And Gears of war 3 kills Gears of war 1s single player.
Gears of war 1 had a meh campaign. Gears of war 2 had a laughable one.[QUOTE="contracts420"]
[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]
What? In Gears of war 1 the pinnicle of the game was single player. Multi-player has always been a joke up until the beta. I don't know where people got that notion. I still player Gears of war 1 co-op with friends. It was outstanding. Gears of war 2s single player wasn't horrendus but lacked the fun Gears 1 had. And Gears 3 campaign blows even one out of the water.
Bretter2200
TrapJak is right. Gears is known for it's multiplayer. It's SP is nothing to boast about.
Gears of war 1 had a phenominal single player. Gears of war 2 had a medicore one. And Gears of war 3 kills Gears of war 1s single player.
I disagree. The SP portion of the Gears franchise is just meh. I've had Gears 1 for a few years now. Still can't bring myself to finish the campaign. Which would put it in the same category as Killzone 2. Have had it for years... still can't bring myself to finish it. Mind you I am near the end of Gears 1. You are entitled to your opinion. But the majority will disagree with you.
[QUOTE="Bretter2200"][QUOTE="contracts420"]
TrapJak is right. Gears is known for it's multiplayer. It's SP is nothing to boast about.
toast_burner
Gears of war 1 had a phenominal single player. Gears of war 2 had a medicore one. And Gears of war 3 kills Gears of war 1s single player.
Gears of war 1 had a meh campaign. Gears of war 2 had a laughable one.You don't know what your talking about. Gears of war 1 had a fantastic campaign. Other wise the series would've failed. I don't even think you've played the original?
Gears of war 2 had an average one.
[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]
[QUOTE="contracts420"]
TrapJak is right. Gears is known for it's multiplayer. It's SP is nothing to boast about.
contracts420
Gears of war 1 had a phenominal single player. Gears of war 2 had a medicore one. And Gears of war 3 kills Gears of war 1s single player.
I disagree. The SP portion of the Gears franchise is just meh. I've had Gears 1 for a few years now. Still can't bring myself to finish the campaign. Which would put it in the same category as Killzone 2. Have had it for years... still can't bring myself to finish it. Mind you I am near the end of Gears 1. You are entitled to your opinion. But the majority will disagree with you.
The majority actually disagrees with you because critics praised Gears of war 1s campaign as the pinnicle of its succues.
Wow, great! And how about the story.. any good? Cause they tryed to make GEOW 2 more emotional and such. Does it succeed beter this time around? Thanksvlens
Yes, it's not emotional this time around. It's a lot more thought out. I'm trying to deliver some pleasing information but all I'm getting is guys who've probably never even touched a Gears game.
Gears of war 1 had a meh campaign. Gears of war 2 had a laughable one.[QUOTE="toast_burner"][QUOTE="Bretter2200"]
Gears of war 1 had a phenominal single player. Gears of war 2 had a medicore one. And Gears of war 3 kills Gears of war 1s single player.
Bretter2200
You don't know what your talking about. Gears of war 1 had a fantastic campaign. Other wise the series would've failed. I don't even think you've played the original?
Gears of war 2 had an average one.
It came with my 360. The MP was the best part about it, overall it was an ok game, nothing special.[QUOTE="Bretter2200"][QUOTE="toast_burner"] Gears of war 1 had a meh campaign. Gears of war 2 had a laughable one.toast_burner
You don't know what your talking about. Gears of war 1 had a fantastic campaign. Other wise the series would've failed. I don't even think you've played the original?
Gears of war 2 had an average one.
It came with my 360. The MP was the best part about it, overall it was an ok game, nothing special.Had it been nothing special it wouldn't have been so critically acclaimed. You don't get a game that scores a 9.6 on game spot for some things that's not special.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment