PS3 vs 8800gt VS 360 benchmark. not so new! for the haters!

  • 77 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for S3P4eeever
S3P4eeever

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 S3P4eeever
Member since 2009 • 371 Posts

check it and comment!

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=9414174&postcount=476

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

it's an 8800GTS and he doesn't comment on the PC specs.

Avatar image for Dead-Memories
Dead-Memories

6587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 190

User Lists: 0

#4 Dead-Memories
Member since 2008 • 6587 Posts

Why are threads like this still flooding?

Are you that insecure about your playstation :lol:

Avatar image for Irick_cb
Irick_cb

1691

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 Irick_cb
Member since 2009 • 1691 Posts

this is "really f--king old"

but the CPU doesn't really matter, as the generation is all done on the shader pipeline.

GPGPU stuff.

this was UT3 engine tech.

Avatar image for vaderhater
vaderhater

3972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 vaderhater
Member since 2003 • 3972 Posts

Yet at the Pro FX website this article is nowhere to be found was said further on in that thread.

Avatar image for Irick_cb
Irick_cb

1691

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 Irick_cb
Member since 2009 • 1691 Posts

Yet at the Pro FX website this article is nowhere to be found was said further on in that thread.

vaderhater

They ended up removing it back in like 2007/8.

Conspiracies range from bribing from Nvidia/MS to the simple dropping of the PS3 from the supported platforms.

Avatar image for S3P4eeever
S3P4eeever

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 S3P4eeever
Member since 2009 • 371 Posts

Why are threads like this still flooding?

Are you that insecure about your playstation :lol:

Dead-Memories

LOL the ps3 is just a little baby.!! give it time and less hate!

Avatar image for Irick_cb
Irick_cb

1691

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 Irick_cb
Member since 2009 • 1691 Posts

Yet at the Pro FX website this article is nowhere to be found was said further on in that thread.

vaderhater

They ended up removing it back in like 2007/8.

Conspiracies range from bribing from Nvidia/MS to the simple dropping of the PS3 from the supported platforms.

Avatar image for vaderhater
vaderhater

3972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 vaderhater
Member since 2003 • 3972 Posts

[QUOTE="vaderhater"]

Yet at the Pro FX website this article is nowhere to be found was said further on in that thread.

Irick_cb

They ended up removing it back in like 2007/8.

Conspiracies range from bribing from Nvidia/MS to the simple dropping of the PS3 from the supported platforms.

Ill go with the BS factor then.

Avatar image for S3P4eeever
S3P4eeever

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 S3P4eeever
Member since 2009 • 371 Posts

10 SEC FOR THE 360, 5 FOR THE 8800GTS AND 1.2 SEC FOR THE PS3 yay!

ps3 foreeeever!!!!

Avatar image for Irick_cb
Irick_cb

1691

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 Irick_cb
Member since 2009 • 1691 Posts

[QUOTE="Irick_cb"]

[QUOTE="vaderhater"]

Yet at the Pro FX website this article is nowhere to be found was said further on in that thread.

vaderhater

They ended up removing it back in like 2007/8.

Conspiracies range from bribing from Nvidia/MS to the simple dropping of the PS3 from the supported platforms.

Ill go with the BS factor then.

Right, because a massively parallel processor coupled with high memory bandwith to the GPU and rasterisers would obviously not make it a beast at procedural texture generation.

Not that is even matters in practicality, the PS3 has enough storage not to need proceduraly generated textures.

Avatar image for vaderhater
vaderhater

3972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 vaderhater
Member since 2003 • 3972 Posts

[QUOTE="vaderhater"]

[QUOTE="Irick_cb"]

They ended up removing it back in like 2007/8.

Conspiracies range from bribing from Nvidia/MS to the simple dropping of the PS3 from the supported platforms.

Irick_cb

Ill go with the BS factor then.

Right, because a massively parallel processor coupled with high memory bandwith to the GPU and rasterisers would obviously not make it a beast at procedural texture generation.

Not that is even matters in practicality, the PS3 has enough storage not to need procedurally generated textures.

Show me the document at pro fx........otherwise one closed test on one aspect of graphics doesn't mean a thing. Are you trying to sell it like some kind of ownage? Also the PS3 might run into a snag memory wise concerning textures at the best of times. As well I dont remember saying anything of the sort thats highlighted in red. Lastly highlighted in blue the 360 has more memory available due to less OS overhead that it does not need procedurally generate tetures either. But Enjoy your game made of only Procedurally generated textures ok?

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

I stopped listening to the elitest masses of Neogaf long ago.

Avatar image for Saturos3091
Saturos3091

14937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 Saturos3091
Member since 2005 • 14937 Posts

Wow, they could've at least given us the specs of the PC. A low-end GPU like the 8800GTS isn't going to fair much better than the PS3 GPU which has more VRAM...

Now there's CPUs that are much more powerful than The Cell, and since the PS3 came out there were GPUs more powerful than the RSX (outdated when it was announced actually; it's not even the top last gen Nvidia card). So as of today, that information is useless. Also, why would Nvidia bribe the site if their GPU is the one in the PS3? I'll go with the BS theory.

And when we compare PS3 and 360 from that list, no-shortcut real time ray tracing is utterly impossible with today's hardware (there was an article on it like a month and a half ago) unless you're running a top of the line PC and even then it's incredibly taxing. Elements of it are possible on PS3 and 360, but running it full on is not doable with nearly 5 year old technology.

Avatar image for S3P4eeever
S3P4eeever

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 S3P4eeever
Member since 2009 • 371 Posts

Wow, they could've at least given us the specs of the PC. A low-end GPU like the 8800GTS isn't going to fair much better than the PS3 GPU which has more VRAM...

Now there's CPUs that are much more powerful than The Cell, and since the PS3 came out there were GPUs more powerful than the RSX (outdated when it was announced actually; it's not even the top last gen Nvidia card). So as of today, that information is useless. Also, why would Nvidia bribe the site if their GPU is the one in the PS3? I'll go with the BS theory.

And when we compare PS3 and 360 from that list, no-shortcut real time ray tracing is utterly impossible with today's hardware (there was an article on it like a month and a half ago) unless you're running a top of the line PC and even then it's incredibly taxing. Elements of it are possible on PS3 and 360, but running it full on is not doable with nearly 5 year old technology.

Saturos3091

because of the CELL. thats what the article said

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#17 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts
and this has to do with gaming in what way? You wanna proof PS3 is more powerfull? Show me a good looking multiplatform game that runs better on PS3 than on my 8800gt equiped PC because unlike PS3 i can run all multiplatform games at 1080p max settings with 2-4xAA and usually framerates 40-60fps Now again what good looking ps3 games do that? You can stuck at your 600-720p res and noAA and 30fps while i will continue playing at 1920x1080 with AA and 60fps
Avatar image for azell07
azell07

281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 azell07
Member since 2006 • 281 Posts

have you seen the benchies of teh new ati cards? omge bro, 8800 cards are soo old tech... an ati 5850 HD which is a $250 card can run circles around the ps3. btw a 8800GT kills a ps3. That card when released by nvidia was a master piece and a advancement in gpu technology. ps3 has always been old tech.

Avatar image for Velocitas8
Velocitas8

10748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Velocitas8
Member since 2006 • 10748 Posts

and this has to do with gaming in what way? You wanna proof PS3 is more powerfull? Show me a good looking multiplatform game that runs better on PS3 than on my 8800gt equiped PC because unlike PS3 i can run all multiplatform games at 1080p max settings with 2-4xAA and usually framerates 40-60fps Now again what good looking ps3 games do that? You can stuck at your 600-720p res and noAA and 30fps while i will continue playing at 1920x1080 with AA and 60fpsadamosmaki

This.

You can make wild claims about the PS3's power all day, but you just aren't very convincing when the system is struggling to output visuals far below what modern PC GPUs are, even at sub-720p resolutions and relatively low framerates.

Even hardcore fanboys have realized this by now. Seems the OP didn't get the memo.

Avatar image for S3P4eeever
S3P4eeever

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 S3P4eeever
Member since 2009 • 371 Posts

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]and this has to do with gaming in what way? You wanna proof PS3 is more powerfull? Show me a good looking multiplatform game that runs better on PS3 than on my 8800gt equiped PC because unlike PS3 i can run all multiplatform games at 1080p max settings with 2-4xAA and usually framerates 40-60fps Now again what good looking ps3 games do that? You can stuck at your 600-720p res and noAA and 30fps while i will continue playing at 1920x1080 with AA and 60fpsVelocitas8

This.

You can make wild claims about the PS3's power all day, but you just aren't very convincing when the system is struggling to output visuals far below what modern PC GPUs are, even at sub-720p resolutions and relatively low framerates.

Even hardcore fanboys have realized this by now. Seems the OP didn't get the memo.

hey guys take it easy .remember that the ps3 is from 2006

List of PS3 games at 1080 P NATIVE (as of JAN, 2008)

http://boardsus.playstation.com/playstation/board/message?board.id=pslounge&thread.id=469951

Avatar image for ManicAce
ManicAce

3267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#22 ManicAce
Member since 2009 • 3267 Posts
Real world >> numbers on a paper. Call me when CoD4 runs at 1080p on PS3.
Avatar image for S3P4eeever
S3P4eeever

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 S3P4eeever
Member since 2009 • 371 Posts

and this has to do with gaming in what way? You wanna proof PS3 is more powerfull? Show me a good looking multiplatform game that runs better on PS3 than on my 8800gt equiped PC because unlike PS3 i can run all multiplatform games at 1080p max settings with 2-4xAA and usually framerates 40-60fps Now again what good looking ps3 games do that? You can stuck at your 600-720p res and noAA and 30fps while i will continue playing at 1920x1080 with AA and 60fpsadamosmaki

i can run games at 1080p with my 9500gt ocand so what?

that benchmark showed that the ps3 is no joke.

plus on my 65" plasma tvps3 exclusive ARE PERFECTION in picture!

Avatar image for S3P4eeever
S3P4eeever

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 S3P4eeever
Member since 2009 • 371 Posts

and this has to do with gaming in what way? You wanna proof PS3 is more powerfull? Show me a good looking multiplatform game that runs better on PS3 than on my 8800gt equiped PC because unlike PS3 i can run all multiplatform games at 1080p max settings with 2-4xAA and usually framerates 40-60fps Now again what good looking ps3 games do that? You can stuck at your 600-720p res and noAA and 30fps while i will continue playing at 1920x1080 with AA and 60fpsadamosmaki

GT5 WILL BE 1080P NATIVE, so im not stuck at 720p as you lied.+ multiplat games suck.

Avatar image for zbdyx
zbdyx

2055

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#25 zbdyx
Member since 2007 • 2055 Posts

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]and this has to do with gaming in what way? You wanna proof PS3 is more powerfull? Show me a good looking multiplatform game that runs better on PS3 than on my 8800gt equiped PC because unlike PS3 i can run all multiplatform games at 1080p max settings with 2-4xAA and usually framerates 40-60fps Now again what good looking ps3 games do that? You can stuck at your 600-720p res and noAA and 30fps while i will continue playing at 1920x1080 with AA and 60fpsS3P4eeever

GT5 WILL BE 1080P NATIVE, so im not stuck at 720p as you lied.+ multiplat games suck.

Multiplats suck because they look better than some of the exclusives???
Avatar image for S3P4eeever
S3P4eeever

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 S3P4eeever
Member since 2009 • 371 Posts

[QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]and this has to do with gaming in what way? You wanna proof PS3 is more powerfull? Show me a good looking multiplatform game that runs better on PS3 than on my 8800gt equiped PC because unlike PS3 i can run all multiplatform games at 1080p max settings with 2-4xAA and usually framerates 40-60fps Now again what good looking ps3 games do that? You can stuck at your 600-720p res and noAA and 30fps while i will continue playing at 1920x1080 with AA and 60fpszbdyx

GT5 WILL BE 1080P NATIVE, so im not stuck at 720p as you lied.+ multiplat games suck.

Multiplats suck because they look better than some of the exclusives???

they suck because they tend to be more comercial! comercial multiplat sucks

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#27 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]and this has to do with gaming in what way? You wanna proof PS3 is more powerfull? Show me a good looking multiplatform game that runs better on PS3 than on my 8800gt equiped PC because unlike PS3 i can run all multiplatform games at 1080p max settings with 2-4xAA and usually framerates 40-60fps Now again what good looking ps3 games do that? You can stuck at your 600-720p res and noAA and 30fps while i will continue playing at 1920x1080 with AA and 60fpsS3P4eeever

GT5 WILL BE 1080P NATIVE, so im not stuck at 720p as you lied.+ multiplat games suck.

Gt5 is 1280x1080 (not sure about that). Even if thats not the case well done you got 1 decent looking game at 1080p while i'm as many pc gamers run almost all of the games at 1080p Also if you think multiplats suck then you must be satisfied with those 10-12 good exclusives sony got since 2006 and you mustn't play to often. I on the other hand i need more games than jsut 10 games in 3 years
Avatar image for DAZZER7
DAZZER7

2422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#28 DAZZER7
Member since 2004 • 2422 Posts

[QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]and this has to do with gaming in what way? You wanna proof PS3 is more powerfull? Show me a good looking multiplatform game that runs better on PS3 than on my 8800gt equiped PC because unlike PS3 i can run all multiplatform games at 1080p max settings with 2-4xAA and usually framerates 40-60fps Now again what good looking ps3 games do that? You can stuck at your 600-720p res and noAA and 30fps while i will continue playing at 1920x1080 with AA and 60fpsadamosmaki

GT5 WILL BE 1080P NATIVE, so im not stuck at 720p as you lied.+ multiplat games suck.

Gt5 is 1280x1080 (not sure about that). Even if thats not the case well done you got 1 decent looking game at 1080p while i'm as many pc gamers run almost all of the games at 1080p Also if you think multiplats suck then you must be satisfied with those 10-12 good exclusives sony got since 2006 and you mustn't play to often. I on the other hand i need more games than jsut 10 games in 3 years

Exactly, there is consistently a difference between the PS3 and a PC with an 8800GTS. DX10 + 96 Stream Processors + Higher Res Screen Resolution + More Polys being rendered etc...> RSX + Cell

Avatar image for S3P4eeever
S3P4eeever

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 S3P4eeever
Member since 2009 • 371 Posts

[QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]and this has to do with gaming in what way? You wanna proof PS3 is more powerfull? Show me a good looking multiplatform game that runs better on PS3 than on my 8800gt equiped PC because unlike PS3 i can run all multiplatform games at 1080p max settings with 2-4xAA and usually framerates 40-60fps Now again what good looking ps3 games do that? You can stuck at your 600-720p res and noAA and 30fps while i will continue playing at 1920x1080 with AA and 60fpsadamosmaki

GT5 WILL BE 1080P NATIVE, so im not stuck at 720p as you lied.+ multiplat games suck.

Gt5 is 1280x1080 (not sure about that). Even if thats not the case well done you got 1 decent looking game at 1080p while i'm as many pc gamers run almost all of the games at 1080p Also if you think multiplats suck then you must be satisfied with those 10-12 good exclusives sony got since 2006 and you mustn't play to often. I on the other hand i need more games than jsut 10 games in 3 years

truth is i dont game that much anymore thats why i like to enjoy good games. GT5 will be full 1920x1080.wikipedia

and yes i play some xbox360 xclusives with my PC.

http://www.ps3daily.co.uk/20081120/gran-turismo-5-gt5-in-4-times-the-resolution-of-full-hd/

Avatar image for GTR2addict
GTR2addict

11863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 GTR2addict
Member since 2007 • 11863 Posts

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"][QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]

GT5 WILL BE 1080P NATIVE, so im not stuck at 720p as you lied.+ multiplat games suck.

S3P4eeever

Gt5 is 1280x1080 (not sure about that). Even if thats not the case well done you got 1 decent looking game at 1080p while i'm as many pc gamers run almost all of the games at 1080p Also if you think multiplats suck then you must be satisfied with those 10-12 good exclusives sony got since 2006 and you mustn't play to often. I on the other hand i need more games than jsut 10 games in 3 years

truth is i dont game that much anymore thats why i like to enjoy good games. GT5 will be full 1920x1080.wikipedia

and yes i play some xbox360 xclusives with my PC.

it won't. only the menus will be 1920x1080, ingame it'll be 1280x1080 and upscaled horizontally.
Avatar image for hot114
hot114

4489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 hot114
Member since 2003 • 4489 Posts

Curing cancer =/= Rendering a beutiful immersing world

Avatar image for S3P4eeever
S3P4eeever

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 S3P4eeever
Member since 2009 • 371 Posts

bravo, well done PS3, you can beat a single core with 1 gig of ram attached to a stock clocked 320mb 8800GTS! seriously, the ps3 is a weak piece of crap, if you can't deal with that, you're a sony fanboy my 4850 alone wold eat the ps3 as a wholeGTR2addict

lol you are dreaming indeed.

a single core pentium 4 with 8800gts better than a PS3 Pff i wont wast my time no more.

http://www.ps3daily.co.uk/20081120/gran-turismo-5-gt5-in-4-times-the-resolution-of-full-hd/

+ MY FUTURE 5870 WILL EAT YOURCHEAP 4850 FOR BREAKFAST!

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#34 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"][QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]

GT5 WILL BE 1080P NATIVE, so im not stuck at 720p as you lied.+ multiplat games suck.

S3P4eeever

Gt5 is 1280x1080 (not sure about that). Even if thats not the case well done you got 1 decent looking game at 1080p while i'm as many pc gamers run almost all of the games at 1080p Also if you think multiplats suck then you must be satisfied with those 10-12 good exclusives sony got since 2006 and you mustn't play to often. I on the other hand i need more games than jsut 10 games in 3 years

truth is i dont game that much anymore thats why i like to enjoy good games. GT5 will be full 1920x1080.wikipedia

and yes i play some xbox360 xclusives with my PC.

http://www.ps3daily.co.uk/20081120/gran-turismo-5-gt5-in-4-times-the-resolution-of-full-hd/

Great now all you need is 4ps3's to get that res while a pc equiped with a single $400 5870 can pull higher resolutions than those. Dude we get it PS3 is a great console but face it hardware wise is weak ( for crying out loud it only has 256mb of ram as opposed to 2-4gb for a $400-500 pc). The hardware on pd3 was designed in 2004 2005 you think is more powerfull from a pc with a cpu and a vga that got designed in 2007 2008 or 2009?

Avatar image for S3P4eeever
S3P4eeever

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 S3P4eeever
Member since 2009 • 371 Posts

[QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"] Gt5 is 1280x1080 (not sure about that). Even if thats not the case well done you got 1 decent looking game at 1080p while i'm as many pc gamers run almost all of the games at 1080p Also if you think multiplats suck then you must be satisfied with those 10-12 good exclusives sony got since 2006 and you mustn't play to often. I on the other hand i need more games than jsut 10 games in 3 yearsadamosmaki

truth is i dont game that much anymore thats why i like to enjoy good games. GT5 will be full 1920x1080.wikipedia

and yes i play some xbox360 xclusives with my PC.

http://www.ps3daily.co.uk/20081120/gran-turismo-5-gt5-in-4-times-the-resolution-of-full-hd/

Great now all you need is 4ps3's to get that res while a pc equiped with a single $400 5870 can pull higher resolutions than those. Dude we get it PS3 is a great console but face it hardware wise is weak ( for crying out loud it only has 256mb of ram as opposed to 2-4gb for a $400-500 pc). The hardware on pd3 was designed in 2004 2005 you think is more powerfull from a pc with a cpu and a vga that got designed in 2007 2008 or 2009?

DUDE THAT SHOWS THAT GT5 WILL FULL HD... my future5870 will bring me back toreal PC gaming after 4 years. so let me enjoy my PS3 with GT5and all the others @1920x1080p on my 65" plasma which i will enjoy until 2017

lol you said that single core cpu with 8800gts is better than a ps3. please stop arguing

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#36 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]

[QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]

truth is i dont game that much anymore thats why i like to enjoy good games. GT5 will be full 1920x1080.wikipedia

and yes i play some xbox360 xclusives with my PC.

http://www.ps3daily.co.uk/20081120/gran-turismo-5-gt5-in-4-times-the-resolution-of-full-hd/

S3P4eeever

Great now all you need is 4ps3's to get that res while a pc equiped with a single $400 5870 can pull higher resolutions than those. Dude we get it PS3 is a great console but face it hardware wise is weak ( for crying out loud it only has 256mb of ram as opposed to 2-4gb for a $400-500 pc). The hardware on pd3 was designed in 2004 2005 you think is more powerfull from a pc with a cpu and a vga that got designed in 2007 2008 or 2009?

DUDE THAT SHOWS THAT GT5 WILL FULL HD...andtherefore still play onmy65" plasma.

now that 5870 will bring me back toreal PC gaming after 4 years. so let me enjoy my PS3 with GT5 @1920x1080p

Dude read the link you posted in wikipedia about gran turismo ( although like i said wikipedia not the most credible source). It says "native resolution 1280x1024" and upscaled in replays at "1440x1080" so no is not 1080p native is only upscaled at that res
Avatar image for S3P4eeever
S3P4eeever

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 S3P4eeever
Member since 2009 • 371 Posts

[QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]

muahhaha got ya. it was about gt5 prologue!

Great now all you need is 4ps3's to get that res while a pc equiped with a single $400 5870 can pull higher resolutions than those. Dude we get it PS3 is a great console but face it hardware wise is weak ( for crying out loud it only has 256mb of ram as opposed to 2-4gb for a $400-500 pc). The hardware on pd3 was designed in 2004 2005 you think is more powerfull from a pc with a cpu and a vga that got designed in 2007 2008 or 2009?

adamosmaki

DUDE THAT SHOWS THAT GT5 WILL FULL HD...andtherefore still play onmy65" plasma.

now that 5870 will bring me back toreal PC gaming after 4 years. so let me enjoy my PS3 with GT5 @1920x1080p

Dude read the link you posted in wikipedia about gran turismo ( although like i said wikipedia not the most credible source). It says "native resolution 1280x1024" and upscaled in replays at "1440x1080" so no is not 1080p native is only upscaled at that res

muahhaha got ya. it was about gt5 prologue!

gt5 will be full hd and if is not it will be better than any race game you can play onyour lowend 8800gts.

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#38 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"][QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]

DUDE THAT SHOWS THAT GT5 WILL FULL HD...andtherefore still play onmy65" plasma.

now that 5870 will bring me back toreal PC gaming after 4 years. so let me enjoy my PS3 with GT5 @1920x1080p

S3P4eeever

Dude read the link you posted in wikipedia about gran turismo ( although like i said wikipedia not the most credible source). It says "native resolution 1280x1024" and upscaled in replays at "1440x1080" so no is not 1080p native is only upscaled at that res

muahhaha got ya. it was about gt5 prologue!

gt5 will be full hd and if is not it will be better than any race game you can play onyour lowend 8800gts.

My low end vga can run games like burnout paradise and race driver grid at full 1080p with 4xAA and at 60fps but your almighty PS3 can handle only 720p no AA and 30fps.
Avatar image for S3P4eeever
S3P4eeever

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 S3P4eeever
Member since 2009 • 371 Posts

[QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"] Dude read the link you posted in wikipedia about gran turismo ( although like i said wikipedia not the most credible source). It says "native resolution 1280x1024" and upscaled in replays at "1440x1080" so no is not 1080p native is only upscaled at that resadamosmaki

muahhaha got ya. it was about gt5 prologue!

gt5 will be full hd and if is not it will be better than any race game you can play onyour lowend 8800gts.

My low end vga can run games like burnout paradise and race driver grid at full 1080p with 4xAA and at 60fps but your almighty PS3 can handle only 720p no AA and 30fps.

thats beacuse they suck at EA. and GT5 againts burnout will like heaven and hell, likecrysis and MARIO

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#40 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"][QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]

muahhaha got ya. it was about gt5 prologue!

gt5 will be full hd and if is not it will be better than any race game you can play onyour lowend 8800gts.

S3P4eeever

My low end vga can run games like burnout paradise and race driver grid at full 1080p with 4xAA and at 60fps but your almighty PS3 can handle only 720p no AA and 30fps.

thats beacuse they suck at EA. and GT5 againts burnout will like heaven and hell, likecrysis and MARIO

Of course they suck they couldnt harness all that ps3 power and make their games at 1080p just like every good lookin ps3 exclusive. Oh wait neither is killzone 2 neither is uncharted and uncharted 2 and neither any other semi decent looking ps3 game at 1080p. So what does that says acoording to you?
Avatar image for S3P4eeever
S3P4eeever

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 S3P4eeever
Member since 2009 • 371 Posts

[QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"] My low end vga can run games like burnout paradise and race driver grid at full 1080p with 4xAA and at 60fps but your almighty PS3 can handle only 720p no AA and 30fps.adamosmaki

thats beacuse they suck at EA. and GT5 againts burnout will like heaven and hell, likecrysis and MARIO

Of course they suck they couldnt harness all that ps3 power and make their games at 1080p just like every good lookin ps3 exclusive. Oh wait neither is killzone 2 neither is uncharted and uncharted 2 and neither any other semi decent looking ps3 game at 1080p. So what does that says acoording to you?

http://boardsus.playstation.com/playstation/board/message?board.id=ps3&thread.id=3605691

list of full hd ps3 games. nothing more to say. tata

http://boardsus.playstation.com/playstation/board/message?board.id=pslounge&thread.id=469951

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"][QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]

thats beacuse they suck at EA. and GT5 againts burnout will like heaven and hell, likecrysis and MARIO

S3P4eeever

Of course they suck they couldnt harness all that ps3 power and make their games at 1080p just like every good lookin ps3 exclusive. Oh wait neither is killzone 2 neither is uncharted and uncharted 2 and neither any other semi decent looking ps3 game at 1080p. So what does that says acoording to you?

http://boardsus.playstation.com/playstation/board/message?board.id=ps3&thread.id=3605691

list of full hd ps3 games. nothing more to say. tata

Wolf of the Battlefield: Commando 3 = 1920×1080 lol a arcade game.

Wipeout HD = 1920×1080 uses psp assets.

Go Puzzle = 1920×1080 lol an arcade game

GT5 Prologue = 1920×1080 lies

Lair = 800×1080/1600×1080 no no no, 1920x1080 is the only true 1080p

Ridge Racer 7 = 1920×1080

NBA07 = 1920×1080

NBA08 = 1920×1080

Blast Factor = 1920×1080

Calling All Cars = 1920×1080

Echochrome = 1920×1080

Elefunk = 1920×1080

High Velocity Bowling = 1920×1080

Locoroco Cocoreccho = 1920×1080

Mainichi Issyo = 1440×1080

Pixel Junk Monsters/Racers/Eden = 1920×1080

Rub'a'dub = 1600×1080

Snakeball = 1280×1080

Stardust HD = 1280×1080

Sudoku = 1920×1080

Super Rub-a-Dub = 1600×1080

Tekken 5 Dark Resurrection = 1920×1080

nearly every thing you've shown is a psn arcade games others aren't true 1080p and others are outright lies.

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#43 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"][QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]

thats beacuse they suck at EA. and GT5 againts burnout will like heaven and hell, likecrysis and MARIO

S3P4eeever

Of course they suck they couldnt harness all that ps3 power and make their games at 1080p just like every good lookin ps3 exclusive. Oh wait neither is killzone 2 neither is uncharted and uncharted 2 and neither any other semi decent looking ps3 game at 1080p. So what does that says acoording to you?

http://boardsus.playstation.com/playstation/board/message?board.id=ps3&thread.id=3605691

list of full hd ps3 games. nothing more to say. tata

All i see is 15 games neither of which is something special graphics wise running at 1080p out of how many ps3 games total 500-600-700? Now shall we compare that to what 200-300-400 games that came out on 2006 and later that my 8800gt can play at 1080p?
Avatar image for GTR2addict
GTR2addict

11863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 GTR2addict
Member since 2007 • 11863 Posts

[QUOTE="GTR2addict"]bravo, well done PS3, you can beat a single core with 1 gig of ram attached to a stock clocked 320mb 8800GTS! seriously, the ps3 is a weak piece of crap, if you can't deal with that, you're a sony fanboy my 4850 alone wold eat the ps3 as a wholeS3P4eeever

lol you are dreaming indeed.

a single core pentium 4 with 8800gts better than a PS3 Pff i wont wast my time no more.

http://www.ps3daily.co.uk/20081120/gran-turismo-5-gt5-in-4-times-the-resolution-of-full-hd/

+ MY FUTURE 5870 WILL EAT YOURCHEAP 4850 FOR BREAKFAST!

my future crossfire 5850's will eat your 5870 for lunch :lol:
Avatar image for S3P4eeever
S3P4eeever

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 S3P4eeever
Member since 2009 • 371 Posts

[QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]

[QUOTE="GTR2addict"]bravo, well done PS3, you can beat a single core with 1 gig of ram attached to a stock clocked 320mb 8800GTS! seriously, the ps3 is a weak piece of crap, if you can't deal with that, you're a sony fanboy my 4850 alone wold eat the ps3 as a wholeGTR2addict

lol you are dreaming indeed.

a single core pentium 4 with 8800gts better than a PS3 Pff i wont wast my time no more.

http://www.ps3daily.co.uk/20081120/gran-turismo-5-gt5-in-4-times-the-resolution-of-full-hd/

+ MY FUTURE 5870 WILL EAT YOURCHEAP 4850 FOR BREAKFAST!

my future crossfire 5850's will eat your 5870 for lunch :lol:

lolollolo my future 5890x2 crossfire will blow the roof of the dump.

Avatar image for S3P4eeever
S3P4eeever

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 S3P4eeever
Member since 2009 • 371 Posts

[QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"] Of course they suck they couldnt harness all that ps3 power and make their games at 1080p just like every good lookin ps3 exclusive. Oh wait neither is killzone 2 neither is uncharted and uncharted 2 and neither any other semi decent looking ps3 game at 1080p. So what does that says acoording to you?adamosmaki

http://boardsus.playstation.com/playstation/board/message?board.id=ps3&thread.id=3605691

list of full hd ps3 games. nothing more to say. tata

All i see is 15 games neither of which is something special graphics wise running at 1080p out of how many ps3 games total 500-600-700? Now shall we compare that to what 200-300-400 games that came out on 2006 and later that my 8800gt can play at 1080p?

hey im a pc gamer as well dont try to say to me that your 8800gt is gonna be better tan my ps3. i will still be sucking thejuice out my ps3 while your card will be useless

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#47 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"][QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]

http://boardsus.playstation.com/playstation/board/message?board.id=ps3&thread.id=3605691

list of full hd ps3 games. nothing more to say. tata

S3P4eeever

All i see is 15 games neither of which is something special graphics wise running at 1080p out of how many ps3 games total 500-600-700? Now shall we compare that to what 200-300-400 games that came out on 2006 and later that my 8800gt can play at 1080p?

hey im a pc gamer as well dont try to say to me that your 8800gt is gonna be better tan my ps3. i will still be sucking thejuice out my ps3 while your card will be useless

you see it is already better because ps3 cant all of magically transform that 7800gtx call me RSX to a better vga. You can optimize a game on PS3 as much as you want but fact is that a ps3 game will never look as good as the same game on a pc equiped with an 8800gt and a decent CPU. The only way to measure performance between the 2 platforms are multiplats games and like i said a mere 8800gt can run those games at 2,5x the resolution the PS3 can and usually with AA something that is only theoritacally possible on Ps3 because games that use more than 2xMsAA on PS3 are non existant Also why my card will be useless i dont get your point here
Avatar image for S3P4eeever
S3P4eeever

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 S3P4eeever
Member since 2009 • 371 Posts

[QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"] All i see is 15 games neither of which is something special graphics wise running at 1080p out of how many ps3 games total 500-600-700? Now shall we compare that to what 200-300-400 games that came out on 2006 and later that my 8800gt can play at 1080p?adamosmaki

hey im a pc gamer as well dont try to say to me that your 8800gt is gonna be better tan my ps3. i will still be sucking thejuice out my ps3 while your card will be useless

you see it is already better because ps3 cant all of magically transform that 7800gtx call me RSX to a better vga. You can optimize a game on PS3 as much as you want but fact is that a ps3 game will never look as good as the same game on a pc equiped with an 8800gt and a decent CPU. The only way to measure performance between the 2 platforms are multiplats games and like i said a mere 8800gt can run those games at 2,5x the resolution the PS3 can and usually with AA something that is only theoritacally possible on Ps3 because games that use more than 2xMsAA on PS3 are non existant Also why my card will be useless i dont get your point here

its easy, because of the programer optimization. for example oblivion looks pretty good in 7900gt but fallout 3wont look as good in 7900gt. nowa game likeRAGE will look fine in 8800gt and will look fine in ps3, but itwont look that good on a 7900gt. later on games will look worse on 8800gt than in a ps3. sorry im not a native english speaker

Avatar image for Major_Reeves
Major_Reeves

477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Major_Reeves
Member since 2009 • 477 Posts

I doubt about the legitimacy of those tests.

Avatar image for Hanass
Hanass

2204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#50 Hanass
Member since 2008 • 2204 Posts

Wow, cows are trying to fool people who know nothing about computers now? You think you can trick us by comparing the PS3 to a 4 year old video card? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Tell you what, a $150 video card today is 3 times more powerful than the entire PS3.