What is your yearly limit?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Honestly nothing. It's killing me to even pay for WoW, but I continue to due so cause it's one of the best games ever. Nothing else really like it that's free. Now for consoles, nothing. I paid for their system, their games, their accessories. For non-dedicated servers, you shouldn't be charged at all. (MW2's online system is a joke for example. That's not worth paying 8 bucks a month, or 60 a year.)
Nothing I never even payed for Xbox Live. I had a free trial then somebody gave me a one week trial they had a few weeks later somebody on my friends list gave me a code because they were charged for 2 one years subscriptions so he asked people on his friends list and I responded I only had Silver and he gave me a code for 1 year Gold Subscription.
$15 dollars for open world MMOs...beyond that particular genre I don't feel that a p2p system is needed.
$0.00 USD. I do not think it is fair for a consumer to buy a game and then pay another fee to access the online component. MMORPG's are a small exception depending on how much support it gets, but anything outside of that does not seem right.
I don´t pay to play online(well,besides my internet conection and my WoW subscription:D).
Arach666
plus the old republic when it comes out?
I'm loving the responses in this thread. I own all the main systems, but I certainly do not pay for XBL Gold. Zero dollars, zero cents.
[QUOTE="Arach666"]
I don´t pay to play online(well,besides my internet conection and my WoW subscription:D).
TheShadowLord07
plus the old republic when it comes out?
Well yes,but then I won´t be paying the WoW subscription anymore,I never play more than one subscription based MMO at once.O_o Besides,I still have to see how good ToR will be.Hmm a lot of zeros. Will be interesting next gen when Sony start to charge for online as well.Anjunaddict
Sony is smarter than that :P For extra services besides just online gaming, I'm willing to bet it'll still be free. Everything else? Paid. Does that bother me? Nope. Cause I don't use consoles to do anything besides play games offline and online.
[QUOTE="TheShadowLord07"][QUOTE="Arach666"]
I don´t pay to play online(well,besides my internet conection and my WoW subscription:D).
Arach666
plus the old republic when it comes out?
Well yes,but then I won´t be paying the WoW subscription anymore,I never play more than one subscription based MMO at once.O_o Besides,I still have to see how good ToR will be.whaaaat. but the new expansion is coming out! and you have the collectors edition already pre order! how can you betray blizzard?! :evil:
:P
[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"]Hmm a lot of zeros. Will be interesting next gen when Sony start to charge for online as well.ChubbyGuy40
Sony is smarter than that :P For extra services besides just online gaming, I'm willing to bet it'll still be free. Everything else? Paid. Does that bother me? Nope. Cause I don't use consoles to do anything besides play games offline and online.
You're right, they're smart. And when they see M$ making hundreds of millions of XBL, they will do the same with their next gen PSN. And it will be for online gaming, not other services that people can live without. Charging for online gaming is where the money is made, not services like PSN+No there's not. This thread isn't about the news of what Microsoft is charging for Gold. It's simply asking what online game fans would pay per year to play online games for any and all online services that cater to it.There's a thread for this :lol:
Sh4nk3r
Also, to those complaining about the poll options, if you wont pay for it, simply say so in your comment because all offline and SP gamers would choose that option. Problem solved.
Well yes,but then I won´t be paying the WoW subscription anymore,I never play more than one subscription based MMO at once.O_o Besides,I still have to see how good ToR will be.[QUOTE="Arach666"][QUOTE="TheShadowLord07"]
plus the old republic when it comes out?
TheShadowLord07
whaaaat. but the new expansion is coming out! and you have the collectors edition already pre order! how can you betray blizzard?! :evil:
:P
lol,I´ll be back to Cataclysm when I´m tired of ToR(although if ToR is that good,maybe that will take awhile!). Besides,ToR is only coming in the Q2 2011,so I´ll have plenty of time with Cataclysm!:P[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"][QUOTE="Anjunaddict"]Hmm a lot of zeros. Will be interesting next gen when Sony start to charge for online as well.Anjunaddict
Sony is smarter than that :P For extra services besides just online gaming, I'm willing to bet it'll still be free. Everything else? Paid. Does that bother me? Nope. Cause I don't use consoles to do anything besides play games offline and online.
You're right, they're smart. And when they see M$ making hundreds of millions of XBL, they will do the same with their next gen PSN. And it will be for online gaming, not other services that people can live without. Charging for online gaming is where the money is made, not services like PSN+And if people refuse to pay for online, and that gimps their hardware/software sales?
Sony lost plenty of money with the launch of the PS3, and even had the balls to bring it into the market at 500/600 bucks instead of waiting for it to be "profitable." They continued to lose money until the Slim came along. If they haven't copied their online yet, which has been active for what 8 years now? I can't see them charging for basic online in the future.
bugger all (and i get £140 a week from my part time job :P) its just something i cant justify spending money on when i have other activities to consider.Going out to the pub for me is probably equal or more than a year's live subscription if i decide to start drinking pitchers of Jager and monster in wetherspoons lmao but hey ho im a student drinking tends to be the better choice of activity when the local night club has a student night on xD.
You're right, they're smart. And when they see M$ making hundreds of millions of XBL, they will do the same with their next gen PSN. And it will be for online gaming, not other services that people can live without. Charging for online gaming is where the money is made, not services like PSN+[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"][QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]
Sony is smarter than that :P For extra services besides just online gaming, I'm willing to bet it'll still be free. Everything else? Paid. Does that bother me? Nope. Cause I don't use consoles to do anything besides play games offline and online.
ChubbyGuy40
And if people refuse to pay for online, and that gimps their hardware/software sales?
Sony lost plenty of money with the launch of the PS3, and even had the balls to bring it into the market at 500/600 bucks instead of waiting for it to be "profitable." They continued to lose money until the Slim came along. If they haven't copied their online yet, which has been active for what 8 years now? I can't see them charging for basic online in the future.
People won't refuse, thats what i find funny. When Sony starts to charge for online, people will pay because other than the PC there will be no free alternative.
The only reason Sony hasn't charged for online this gen is because of their incompetence when it comes to online. Microsoft launched the 360 which was practically built around Xbox Live. It was completely integrated. Sony on the other hand launched with a joke of an online system, which it continued to add to, to try and keep up with XBL. The end result is a mish mash of a system called PSN which Sony wouldn't be able get away with charging for.
Next gen with their new PSN, i guarantee you they will charge for it.
Where is the $0 option? I am already paying for my internet and I have already paid for the game itself... so why (unless it is an MMO that gets continued support) would I pay to play online? I am a PC gamer for the most part and play on dedicated servers so it is free unless I donate (completely optional). The same should be true for consoles, free online.
You're right, they're smart. And when they see M$ making hundreds of millions of XBL, they will do the same with their next gen PSN. And it will be for online gaming, not other services that people can live without. Charging for online gaming is where the money is made, not services like PSN+[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"][QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]
Sony is smarter than that :P For extra services besides just online gaming, I'm willing to bet it'll still be free. Everything else? Paid. Does that bother me? Nope. Cause I don't use consoles to do anything besides play games offline and online.
ChubbyGuy40
And if people refuse to pay for online, and that gimps their hardware/software sales?
Sony lost plenty of money with the launch of the PS3, and even had the balls to bring it into the market at 500/600 bucks instead of waiting for it to be "profitable." They continued to lose money until the Slim came along. If they haven't copied their online yet, which has been active for what 8 years now? I can't see them charging for basic online in the future.
I think you both have points. I'm not sure if an online subscription would actually gimp Sony's next-gen system because - well it doesn't currently exist and we know nothing about it. But if they price it well, if its features are on-par with whatever Microsoft offers, they could probably get away with an online subscription without it affecting hardware sales. They could still undercut Microsoft in a different way, like for example by offering online play at half the price. That would give them the advantage of being able to say "our online is half the price of our competitor's" while still making money off of it.Needless to say, I hope, truly hope that they stick to their guns and keep basic online play free. Sony has established a great precedent here, just like they did with having standardized, swappable hard drives (but this is another area they could be making lots of revenue on by using expensive, propreitary hard drives).
[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]
[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"] You're right, they're smart. And when they see M$ making hundreds of millions of XBL, they will do the same with their next gen PSN. And it will be for online gaming, not other services that people can live without. Charging for online gaming is where the money is made, not services like PSN+Anjunaddict
And if people refuse to pay for online, and that gimps their hardware/software sales?
Sony lost plenty of money with the launch of the PS3, and even had the balls to bring it into the market at 500/600 bucks instead of waiting for it to be "profitable." They continued to lose money until the Slim came along. If they haven't copied their online yet, which has been active for what 8 years now? I can't see them charging for basic online in the future.
People won't refuse, thats what i find funny. When Sony starts to charge for online, people will pay because other than the PC there will be no free alternative.
The only reason Sony hasn't charged for online this gen is because of their incompetence when it comes to online. Microsoft launched the 360 which was practically built around Xbox Live. It was completely integrated. Sony on the other hand launched with a joke of an online system, which it continued to add to, to try and keep up with XBL. The end result is a mish mash of a system called PSN which Sony wouldn't be able get away with charging for.
Next gen with their new PSN, i guarantee you they will charge for it.
joke of an online system? It's free. Its already miles ahead of XBL. It allows you to play online, has voice chat in games, and provides game and system updates. There's nothing more you need.
[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"]
[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]
And if people refuse to pay for online, and that gimps their hardware/software sales?
Sony lost plenty of money with the launch of the PS3, and even had the balls to bring it into the market at 500/600 bucks instead of waiting for it to be "profitable." They continued to lose money until the Slim came along. If they haven't copied their online yet, which has been active for what 8 years now? I can't see them charging for basic online in the future.
ChubbyGuy40
People won't refuse, thats what i find funny. When Sony starts to charge for online, people will pay because other than the PC there will be no free alternative.
The only reason Sony hasn't charged for online this gen is because of their incompetence when it comes to online. Microsoft launched the 360 which was practically built around Xbox Live. It was completely integrated. Sony on the other hand launched with a joke of an online system, which it continued to add to, to try and keep up with XBL. The end result is a mish mash of a system called PSN which Sony wouldn't be able get away with charging for.
Next gen with their new PSN, i guarantee you they will charge for it.
joke of an online system? It's free. Its already miles ahead of XBL. It allows you to play online, has voice chat in games, and provides game and system updates. There's nothing more you need.
I said it launched with a joke of an online system. Because it was. I didn't say its a joke now.
Zero of course. Though if i like a game but it lacks servers then i'll happily rent a server if there's the players to occupy it.
$0.00
I use the internet daily but as far as gaming goes, I can go weeks or more without playing a game online. It's not worth it to me to pay for something I'm not going to use all the time.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment