Online gamers, what's the most you would pay to play online?

  • 81 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#1 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

What is your yearly limit?

Avatar image for Sky-
Sky-

4682

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Sky-
Member since 2010 • 4682 Posts

Zero dollars and zero cents. :)

Avatar image for RadecSupreme
RadecSupreme

4824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#3 RadecSupreme
Member since 2009 • 4824 Posts

Nothing.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Honestly nothing. It's killing me to even pay for WoW, but I continue to due so cause it's one of the best games ever. Nothing else really like it that's free. Now for consoles, nothing. I paid for their system, their games, their accessories. For non-dedicated servers, you shouldn't be charged at all. (MW2's online system is a joke for example. That's not worth paying 8 bucks a month, or 60 a year.)

Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts

Nothing I never even payed for Xbox Live. I had a free trial then somebody gave me a one week trial they had a few weeks later somebody on my friends list gave me a code because they were charged for 2 one years subscriptions so he asked people on his friends list and I responded I only had Silver and he gave me a code for 1 year Gold Subscription.

Avatar image for 93soccer
93soccer

4602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 93soccer
Member since 2009 • 4602 Posts
Wait, I'm confused. Is this about XBL prices or like MMO prices? For either, I would pay as much as necessary if I really enjoyed it
Avatar image for lucfonzy
lucfonzy

1835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 lucfonzy
Member since 2008 • 1835 Posts
Nothing, i play PC. Don't need live on my xbox either.
Avatar image for aroxx_ab
aroxx_ab

13236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 aroxx_ab
Member since 2005 • 13236 Posts

Depends, if it is a MMO like World of warcraft that i want to play i would pay like it cost now. But if it is normal games like CoD, Battlefield etc i would not pay a penny.

Avatar image for 3rdbass
3rdbass

3301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 3rdbass
Member since 2009 • 3301 Posts

TC you really should have a zero option as I'm sure there are many people like myself who refuse to pay for a service that should be free to begin with when you purchase a game.

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#10 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23286 Posts

I don´t pay to play online(well,besides my internet conection and my WoW subscription:D).

Avatar image for tomarlyn
tomarlyn

20148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 tomarlyn
Member since 2005 • 20148 Posts
Zero here
Avatar image for UnknownSniper65
UnknownSniper65

9238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 UnknownSniper65
Member since 2004 • 9238 Posts

$15 dollars for open world MMOs...beyond that particular genre I don't feel that a p2p system is needed.

Avatar image for Valiant_Rebel
Valiant_Rebel

4197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Valiant_Rebel
Member since 2009 • 4197 Posts

$0.00 USD. I do not think it is fair for a consumer to buy a game and then pay another fee to access the online component. MMORPG's are a small exception depending on how much support it gets, but anything outside of that does not seem right.

Avatar image for Sh4nk3r
Sh4nk3r

282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Sh4nk3r
Member since 2010 • 282 Posts

There's a thread for this :lol:

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=27434788&tag=topics;title

Avatar image for TheShadowLord07
TheShadowLord07

23083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 TheShadowLord07
Member since 2006 • 23083 Posts

I don´t pay to play online(well,besides my internet conection and my WoW subscription:D).

Arach666

plus the old republic when it comes out?

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

I'm loving the responses in this thread. I own all the main systems, but I certainly do not pay for XBL Gold. Zero dollars, zero cents.

Avatar image for Anjunaddict
Anjunaddict

4178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Anjunaddict
Member since 2010 • 4178 Posts
Hmm a lot of zeros. Will be interesting next gen when Sony start to charge for online as well.
Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#19 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23286 Posts

[QUOTE="Arach666"]

I don´t pay to play online(well,besides my internet conection and my WoW subscription:D).

TheShadowLord07

plus the old republic when it comes out?

Well yes,but then I won´t be paying the WoW subscription anymore,I never play more than one subscription based MMO at once.O_o Besides,I still have to see how good ToR will be.
Avatar image for dovberg
dovberg

3348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#20 dovberg
Member since 2009 • 3348 Posts

I'm not sure if there is a price I would be ok with. I didn't bother renewing my gold membership this year and I just decided I'll play online PS3 only.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Hmm a lot of zeros. Will be interesting next gen when Sony start to charge for online as well.Anjunaddict

Sony is smarter than that :P For extra services besides just online gaming, I'm willing to bet it'll still be free. Everything else? Paid. Does that bother me? Nope. Cause I don't use consoles to do anything besides play games offline and online.

Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#22 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts
i'm a PC gamer. Zero to play shooters and that type online. i will pay up to $15/month for persistent world games though (mmorpgs)
Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10310

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10310 Posts

I prefer leaving it optional and pay zero as default.

Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts
Nothing.
Avatar image for TheShadowLord07
TheShadowLord07

23083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 TheShadowLord07
Member since 2006 • 23083 Posts

[QUOTE="TheShadowLord07"]

[QUOTE="Arach666"]

I don´t pay to play online(well,besides my internet conection and my WoW subscription:D).

Arach666

plus the old republic when it comes out?

Well yes,but then I won´t be paying the WoW subscription anymore,I never play more than one subscription based MMO at once.O_o Besides,I still have to see how good ToR will be.

whaaaat. but the new expansion is coming out! and you have the collectors edition already pre order! how can you betray blizzard?! :evil:

:P

Avatar image for Dahaka-UK
Dahaka-UK

6915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Dahaka-UK
Member since 2005 • 6915 Posts

Ask the lems about this subject, rest of us are having a field day with free online.

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#27 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

15 a month for a mmo. For everything else? Nothing.

Avatar image for Anjunaddict
Anjunaddict

4178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Anjunaddict
Member since 2010 • 4178 Posts

[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"]Hmm a lot of zeros. Will be interesting next gen when Sony start to charge for online as well.ChubbyGuy40

Sony is smarter than that :P For extra services besides just online gaming, I'm willing to bet it'll still be free. Everything else? Paid. Does that bother me? Nope. Cause I don't use consoles to do anything besides play games offline and online.

You're right, they're smart. And when they see M$ making hundreds of millions of XBL, they will do the same with their next gen PSN. And it will be for online gaming, not other services that people can live without. Charging for online gaming is where the money is made, not services like PSN+
Avatar image for ianuilliam
ianuilliam

4955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 ianuilliam
Member since 2006 • 4955 Posts

I'm willing to pay for some persistant world MMOs, but for basic online gaming, nothing.

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#30 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

There's a thread for this :lol:

Sh4nk3r

No there's not. This thread isn't about the news of what Microsoft is charging for Gold. It's simply asking what online game fans would pay per year to play online games for any and all online services that cater to it.

Also, to those complaining about the poll options, if you wont pay for it, simply say so in your comment because all offline and SP gamers would choose that option. Problem solved.

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#31 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23286 Posts

[QUOTE="Arach666"][QUOTE="TheShadowLord07"]

plus the old republic when it comes out?

TheShadowLord07

Well yes,but then I won´t be paying the WoW subscription anymore,I never play more than one subscription based MMO at once.O_o Besides,I still have to see how good ToR will be.

whaaaat. but the new expansion is coming out! and you have the collectors edition already pre order! how can you betray blizzard?! :evil:

:P

lol,I´ll be back to Cataclysm when I´m tired of ToR(although if ToR is that good,maybe that will take awhile!). Besides,ToR is only coming in the Q2 2011,so I´ll have plenty of time with Cataclysm!:P
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"]Hmm a lot of zeros. Will be interesting next gen when Sony start to charge for online as well.Anjunaddict

Sony is smarter than that :P For extra services besides just online gaming, I'm willing to bet it'll still be free. Everything else? Paid. Does that bother me? Nope. Cause I don't use consoles to do anything besides play games offline and online.

You're right, they're smart. And when they see M$ making hundreds of millions of XBL, they will do the same with their next gen PSN. And it will be for online gaming, not other services that people can live without. Charging for online gaming is where the money is made, not services like PSN+

And if people refuse to pay for online, and that gimps their hardware/software sales?

Sony lost plenty of money with the launch of the PS3, and even had the balls to bring it into the market at 500/600 bucks instead of waiting for it to be "profitable." They continued to lose money until the Slim came along. If they haven't copied their online yet, which has been active for what 8 years now? I can't see them charging for basic online in the future.

Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

bugger all (and i get £140 a week from my part time job :P) its just something i cant justify spending money on when i have other activities to consider.Going out to the pub for me is probably equal or more than a year's live subscription if i decide to start drinking pitchers of Jager and monster in wetherspoons lmao but hey ho im a student drinking tends to be the better choice of activity when the local night club has a student night on xD.

Avatar image for Anjunaddict
Anjunaddict

4178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Anjunaddict
Member since 2010 • 4178 Posts

[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"][QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

Sony is smarter than that :P For extra services besides just online gaming, I'm willing to bet it'll still be free. Everything else? Paid. Does that bother me? Nope. Cause I don't use consoles to do anything besides play games offline and online.

ChubbyGuy40

You're right, they're smart. And when they see M$ making hundreds of millions of XBL, they will do the same with their next gen PSN. And it will be for online gaming, not other services that people can live without. Charging for online gaming is where the money is made, not services like PSN+

And if people refuse to pay for online, and that gimps their hardware/software sales?

Sony lost plenty of money with the launch of the PS3, and even had the balls to bring it into the market at 500/600 bucks instead of waiting for it to be "profitable." They continued to lose money until the Slim came along. If they haven't copied their online yet, which has been active for what 8 years now? I can't see them charging for basic online in the future.

People won't refuse, thats what i find funny. When Sony starts to charge for online, people will pay because other than the PC there will be no free alternative.

The only reason Sony hasn't charged for online this gen is because of their incompetence when it comes to online. Microsoft launched the 360 which was practically built around Xbox Live. It was completely integrated. Sony on the other hand launched with a joke of an online system, which it continued to add to, to try and keep up with XBL. The end result is a mish mash of a system called PSN which Sony wouldn't be able get away with charging for.

Next gen with their new PSN, i guarantee you they will charge for it.

Avatar image for arto1223
arto1223

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#35 arto1223
Member since 2005 • 4412 Posts

Where is the $0 option? I am already paying for my internet and I have already paid for the game itself... so why (unless it is an MMO that gets continued support) would I pay to play online? I am a PC gamer for the most part and play on dedicated servers so it is free unless I donate (completely optional). The same should be true for consoles, free online.

Avatar image for Rockman999
Rockman999

7507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Rockman999
Member since 2005 • 7507 Posts

The same amount I pay now, zip.

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"][QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

Sony is smarter than that :P For extra services besides just online gaming, I'm willing to bet it'll still be free. Everything else? Paid. Does that bother me? Nope. Cause I don't use consoles to do anything besides play games offline and online.

ChubbyGuy40

You're right, they're smart. And when they see M$ making hundreds of millions of XBL, they will do the same with their next gen PSN. And it will be for online gaming, not other services that people can live without. Charging for online gaming is where the money is made, not services like PSN+

And if people refuse to pay for online, and that gimps their hardware/software sales?

Sony lost plenty of money with the launch of the PS3, and even had the balls to bring it into the market at 500/600 bucks instead of waiting for it to be "profitable." They continued to lose money until the Slim came along. If they haven't copied their online yet, which has been active for what 8 years now? I can't see them charging for basic online in the future.

I think you both have points. I'm not sure if an online subscription would actually gimp Sony's next-gen system because - well it doesn't currently exist and we know nothing about it. But if they price it well, if its features are on-par with whatever Microsoft offers, they could probably get away with an online subscription without it affecting hardware sales. They could still undercut Microsoft in a different way, like for example by offering online play at half the price. That would give them the advantage of being able to say "our online is half the price of our competitor's" while still making money off of it.

Needless to say, I hope, truly hope that they stick to their guns and keep basic online play free. Sony has established a great precedent here, just like they did with having standardized, swappable hard drives (but this is another area they could be making lots of revenue on by using expensive, propreitary hard drives).

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"] You're right, they're smart. And when they see M$ making hundreds of millions of XBL, they will do the same with their next gen PSN. And it will be for online gaming, not other services that people can live without. Charging for online gaming is where the money is made, not services like PSN+Anjunaddict

And if people refuse to pay for online, and that gimps their hardware/software sales?

Sony lost plenty of money with the launch of the PS3, and even had the balls to bring it into the market at 500/600 bucks instead of waiting for it to be "profitable." They continued to lose money until the Slim came along. If they haven't copied their online yet, which has been active for what 8 years now? I can't see them charging for basic online in the future.

People won't refuse, thats what i find funny. When Sony starts to charge for online, people will pay because other than the PC there will be no free alternative.

The only reason Sony hasn't charged for online this gen is because of their incompetence when it comes to online. Microsoft launched the 360 which was practically built around Xbox Live. It was completely integrated. Sony on the other hand launched with a joke of an online system, which it continued to add to, to try and keep up with XBL. The end result is a mish mash of a system called PSN which Sony wouldn't be able get away with charging for.

Next gen with their new PSN, i guarantee you they will charge for it.

joke of an online system? It's free. Its already miles ahead of XBL. It allows you to play online, has voice chat in games, and provides game and system updates. There's nothing more you need.

Avatar image for Anjunaddict
Anjunaddict

4178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Anjunaddict
Member since 2010 • 4178 Posts

[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"]

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

And if people refuse to pay for online, and that gimps their hardware/software sales?

Sony lost plenty of money with the launch of the PS3, and even had the balls to bring it into the market at 500/600 bucks instead of waiting for it to be "profitable." They continued to lose money until the Slim came along. If they haven't copied their online yet, which has been active for what 8 years now? I can't see them charging for basic online in the future.

ChubbyGuy40

People won't refuse, thats what i find funny. When Sony starts to charge for online, people will pay because other than the PC there will be no free alternative.

The only reason Sony hasn't charged for online this gen is because of their incompetence when it comes to online. Microsoft launched the 360 which was practically built around Xbox Live. It was completely integrated. Sony on the other hand launched with a joke of an online system, which it continued to add to, to try and keep up with XBL. The end result is a mish mash of a system called PSN which Sony wouldn't be able get away with charging for.

Next gen with their new PSN, i guarantee you they will charge for it.

joke of an online system? It's free. Its already miles ahead of XBL. It allows you to play online, has voice chat in games, and provides game and system updates. There's nothing more you need.

I said it launched with a joke of an online system. Because it was. I didn't say its a joke now.

Avatar image for black_tempest
black_tempest

2459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 black_tempest
Member since 2008 • 2459 Posts
Right now it's zero.
Avatar image for Nyuuuu
Nyuuuu

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Nyuuuu
Member since 2010 • 380 Posts
$0. It's called PC gaming. 8)
Avatar image for akira2465
akira2465

1194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 akira2465
Member since 2004 • 1194 Posts

I'll pay zero basically out of principle not because I can't afford it, I already pay my ISP and Live and PSN make money off DLC which should keep online free

Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts

Zero of course. Though if i like a game but it lacks servers then i'll happily rent a server if there's the players to occupy it.

Avatar image for Santesyu
Santesyu

4451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#44 Santesyu
Member since 2008 • 4451 Posts

Realistically if it had features I wanted and a overhaul of the online system then 20 would be the sweet spot for me.

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#45 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts
I'd honestly stop playing consoles if the PS3 started charging a necessary amount to get online with it... I never paid for XBL although i think i got a card for my birthday once and used that but i know i will not pay... PS3 free service is one of the best ideas ever, PSN+ as an option should always only be an option.
Avatar image for gamedude234
gamedude234

2558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#46 gamedude234
Member since 2009 • 2558 Posts

30£ a year for XBL

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

17878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#47 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 17878 Posts

$0.00

I use the internet daily but as far as gaming goes, I can go weeks or more without playing a game online. It's not worth it to me to pay for something I'm not going to use all the time.

Avatar image for Dr_Corndog
Dr_Corndog

3245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#48 Dr_Corndog
Member since 2004 • 3245 Posts
Where's the option for "free"?
Avatar image for theherooftime1
theherooftime1

451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#49 theherooftime1
Member since 2005 • 451 Posts
i would pay zero now that i have a taste of what free online is
Avatar image for trollop_scat
trollop_scat

2656

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#50 trollop_scat
Member since 2006 • 2656 Posts

O pay my $50 high speed internet fee and that's all I'm willing to pay, period. This XBox Live price hike is hilarious and making my decidion to switch to PS3 last year look brilliant...