Link
Acceptable, non acceptable? Should they be able to do this? Even though you own content and the system itself?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Link
Acceptable, non acceptable? Should they be able to do this? Even though you own content and the system itself?
If you violate their terms of service I don't see why not, technically any internet connected device with independent registration can be bricked remotely via uploaded firmware, this isn't something exclusive to the Xbox One, Sony could brick PS4's, Nintendo could brick Wii U's etc.
Technically you don't own the software, you've just bought the right to use it. This is a problem with a closed system, you have to use the software in exactly the way that the content owner wants you to use it, in this case MS.
I'm not particularly fussed one way or the other. I don't see myself getting in a situation whereby my console will get bricked by MS. I also assume Sony has similar procedures in place for the PS4, as do most devices.
Publishers are always precious about release dates or people leaking stuff. Let's not pretend MS does this to have a good laugh.
It just happens. I don't consider a company better or worse for doing it.
has there been actual proof they bricked the consoles?
Did you either watch the video or look at the article? I am guessing no?
has there been actual proof they bricked the consoles?
Did you either watch the video or look at the article? I am guessing no?
I did, and then i read more articles. Which is why i'm asking if there is actual proof of the consoles being bricked
Here's the relevant part of the email:
- This being said, as per that agreement with the testers in fault, Microsoft also permanently disabled their Xbox Live accounts (as well as other suspected accounts present on their Xbox One kits) and temporarily blocked all of their Xbox One privileges - meaning that for a period of time which Microsoft decides on depending on the severity of the offense, their Xbox One is entirely unusable.
"Entirely unusable" is the problematic phrase here, and it appears VMC may have over-stepped the mark, because in a statement released to media following Kotaku's report, Microsoft countered VMC's email, stressing the Xbox Ones affected continue to work offline.
Here's the statement:
- To be clear, if a console is suspended from Xbox Live for a violation of the Terms of Use, it can still be used offline. Microsoft enforcement action does not result in a console becoming unusable. Suspensions for both consoles and accounts are determined by looking at a number of factors. To avoid enforcement action including suspension from the service, users should follow the Xbox Live Terms of Use and Code of Conduct.
The upshot is it seems Microsoft cannot "brick" an Xbox One remotely, but it can stop online functionality by blocking access to Xbox Live - for an undisclosed period of time determined by Microsoft itself.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2015-05-15-microsoft-takes-on-gears-of-war-xbox-one-leakers
In response to our request for comment, though, a Microsoft spokesperson seemed to contradict the relevant portion of the VMC letter. “To be clear, if a console is suspended from Xbox Live for a violation of the Terms of Use, it can still be used offline," the statement said. "Microsoft enforcement action does not result in a console becoming unusable. Suspensions for both consoles and accounts are determined by looking at a number of factors. To avoid enforcement action including suspension from the service, users should follow the Xbox Live Terms of Use and Code of Conduct.”
When asked specifically in a follow up whether Microsoft had the ability to stop an Xbox One from working offline, the spokesperson simply pointed us back to a line from his initial response: "Microsoft enforcement action does not result in a console becoming unusable. ... I believe [that line] covers your follow-up query."
http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2015/05/microsoft-pushes-back-on-reports-of-xbox-bricking-punishment/
Not acceptable.
Its perfectly acceptable. You break their terms of use which you have agreed to when you are using their services then they have every right to ban you.
They shouldn't have the right to disable the system completely, they should have the right to yank you from online though, maybe the term "brick" shouldn't be used here.
Not acceptable.
Its perfectly acceptable. You break their terms of use which you have agreed to when you are using their services then they have every right to ban you.
They shouldn't have the right to disable the system completely, they should have the right to yank you from online though.
Which if you read what Lostrib has posted is what they do.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment