It's called WoW, I used to do it for EVE, and so do over 10 million other people. For everybody who think 40$ a year for xbox live is too much LOL @ U especially if ur a computer gamer.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
It's called WoW, I used to do it for EVE, and so do over 10 million other people. For everybody who think 40$ a year for xbox live is too much LOL @ U especially if ur a computer gamer.
Wow is a lot better then xbox live. blizzard actually makes new patches for the games, fixes problems. xbox live is a peer 2 peer which equals lag. in wow if a person lags it's usually the server. i use to play wow for about 3 years. i finally got bored of the game. i was expecting this thread to be something like how u pay for to much of xbox live or something like that. i have a level 70 orc rogue. it has season 1 and 2 pvp gear.iam2greenXbox live doesn't use P2P.
Wow is a lot better then xbox live. blizzard actually makes new patches for the games, fixes problems. xbox live is a peer 2 peer which equals lag. in wow if a person lags it's usually the server. i use to play wow for about 3 years. i finally got bored of the game. i was expecting this thread to be something like how u pay for to much of xbox live or something like that. i have a level 70 orc rogue. it has season 1 and 2 pvp gear.iam2greenLIVE has patches and problem fixer-uppers, and p2p does not, in any way, automatically equate to lag. I don't even know how that laughable notion even got off the ground. :?
Cause relatively Blizzard will remove WoW mothly fees if it was on the 360, right?
That also doesn't change the fact that for every 360/pc (game for windows) games, PC gamers play it for free.
Gee thanks a lot you just wasted 10 seconds of my life that i will never get back.It's called WoW, I used to do it for EVE, and so do over 10 million other people. For everybody who think 40$ a year for xbox live is too much LOL @ U especially if ur a computer gamer.
YankeeDan345
Fun note: Final Fantasy XI on the Xbox 360 requires an additional monthly fee to play the game. It is sufficient to play the game online, but it does not replace your Xbox Live Gold fees. Why? Because in an MMO you can't rely on P2P. The only thing Microsoft provides with Xbox Live is a bunch of prewritten code and a set of standards and certifications. That doesn't allow you to host an MMO. It would crash and burn. Then they have the outright audacity to put advertisements on the dashboard and charge outrageous royalties for their XBox Live Arcade content. MS isn't exactly hurting for revenue from Xbox Live.Cause relatively Blizzard will remove WoW mothly fees if it was on the 360, right?
That also doesn't change the fact that for every 360/pc (game for windows) games, PC gamers play it for free.
Eternal_Sleeper
Wow is a lot better then xbox live. blizzard actually makes new patches for the games, fixes problems. xbox live is a peer 2 peer which equals lag. in wow if a person lags it's usually the server. i use to play wow for about 3 years. i finally got bored of the game. i was expecting this thread to be something like how u pay for to much of xbox live or something like that. i have a level 70 orc rogue. it has season 1 and 2 pvp gear.iam2greenI stopped reading, and realized you have no clue about what you're talking about after I got to your assumption that P2P automatically means lag.
If you enjoy paying $180 a year then that is your choice, I play all my online games for free and there is no way in heaven or hell that I'd support any company taking money for my own network connection that I'm already paying for, and remember, I don't and won't support these kinds of services because if I do then other companies will start to rip us off the same way which is unfair the way I see it.abuabedWell said and your doing the right thing, imo. You state your case by not paying for it. And you didn't insult anyone who does this differently from you. I think it's stupid to pay someone to beat you and verbally abuse you just because you find it arousing. But it's their money and they obviously value that service even though some choice words on th NYC subway will get you beat free of charge.
I used to bash monthly payments for mmo's even when I tried Age of Conan. Now when I started playing an actually finished game (WoW) I have to say that there is so much to do in the game that 15$ a month is nothing compared to what I would spend on new games since most clock in below 10h. The fact that im in Poland helps in justify the subscription too. Example: I bought WoW battlechest + 2 moths pre paid and that cost as much as a new Xbox360 game...now that is value.
If you enjoy paying $180 a year then that is your choice, I play all my online games for free and there is no way in heaven or hell that I'd support any company taking money for my own network connection that I'm already paying for, and remember, I don't and won't support these kinds of services because if I do then other companies will start to rip us off the same way which is unfair the way I see it. abuabed
Very good post. I Agree 100%.
[QUOTE="abuabed"]If you enjoy paying $180 a year then that is your choice, I play all my online games for free and there is no way in heaven or hell that I'd support any company taking money for my own network connection that I'm already paying for, and remember, I don't and won't support these kinds of services because if I do then other companies will start to rip us off the same way which is unfair the way I see it.cainetao11Well said and your doing the right thing, imo. You state your case by not paying for it. And you didn't insult anyone who does this differently from you. I think it's stupid to pay someone to beat you and verbally abuse you just because you find it arousing. But it's their money and they obviously value that service even though some choice words on th NYC subway will get you beat free of charge. I still don't get some SW individuals(not meaning you), they keep on arguing about how a person should spend his/her money on which system and stuff and they justify the way they spend their money on things other people might find useless or costly. This is my money and I have the right to spend it the way I like on any service I find worthy (not including forbidden stuff of course :P). Clean and simple..
Just had a glance at the website and at its cheapest its about £90 a year and around £7.50 a month in the UK. I couldn't understand paying more than £2 a month to play one game.
Wow is a lot better then xbox live. blizzard actually makes new patches for the games, fixes problems. xbox live is a peer 2 peer which equals lag. in wow if a person lags it's usually the server. i use to play wow for about 3 years. i finally got bored of the game.i was expecting this thread to be something like how u pay for to much of xbox live or something like that. i have a level 70 orc rogue. it has season 1 and 2 pvp gear.iam2green
Xbox live gets patches, game devs fix problems, P2P doesn't equal lag, and in WoW both the server AND the players connection cause lag. I've D/Ced countless times because of latency when my whole raid would not.
You gotta be blind if you think Xbox Live doesn't get the same treatment Blizz gives WoW, yet with WoW there's so many balance issues, and malfunctioning servers that I just gave up. That game went down the toilet.
Let me spell this out for you. When you pay your monthly subscription to World of Warcraft, you actually get something substantial in return....something that has to be built and maintained: dedicated servers. Blizzard has to run servers that support literally millions of subscribers. At the same time, they provide consistent updates with huge patches addressing game balance, bugs, or completely changing different aspects of the game/classes/etc. Make no mistake: WoW is expensive. It's a time and money vacuum and the game can go to hell for all I care. But at the same time I know that every time they bill me, I'm getting something actual, something physical, in return. Whereas when you pay for a year of Xbox Live, here's what you get in return. The right to play on their proprietary network (when free alternatives exist on every other platform on the market) service that operates in this way: it has literally zero infrastructure as far as hosting online matches is concerned. It relies on the players.....their internet connection, their Xbox 360's.....to host their own ******* matches. It's a revenue generating scheme that people have bought into because of the ridiculous prestige factor tied into it....period. You get INFERIOR gameplay, INFERIOR performance, and you pay them MONEY so that you can be cheated out of a superior experience on other platforms. This isn't anything to be proud of, this isn't anything to scoff at, this is something to get legitimately worked up over and complain about. Why? Because the minute you stop DOING it the minute Microsoft turns down the heat. Want an example? Take Windows Live. Windows Live is ostensibly Xbox Live for the PC platform. It's functionally identical, down to the subscription fees, so much so in fact that if you had an Xbox Live subscription, they'd let you play on Windows Live. Except for one thing....they've now removed the subscription fee. It is Xbox Live Gold minus the Xbox Live Gold fees. Why did this happen? PC gamers have a CHOICE. They have an open platform and an open network and they get to choose where they play and what they're going to pay for. Xbox Live gamers don't get this option. The only thing 360 owners or Xbox owners can do is be loud and obnoxious, because they can't simply take their business elsewhere (although my opinion is that they should, when they're choosing a console to buy). When you're playing on Xbox Live, it's sucking up bandwidth from your internet connection and forcing your Xbox 360 to do two things simultaneously...play a game from the client-side, and host the entire match from the server-side.Brownesque
LOL.... Oh my, oh my.... got tired of making sense did we?
Horrible comparison, but to be fair I think anyone that does pay a monthly fee to play a game is a fool. Why pay $180 on one game when you could get 3 new ones that won't ruin your social life completely?It's called WoW, I used to do it for EVE, and so do over 10 million other people. For everybody who think 40$ a year for xbox live is too much LOL @ U especially if ur a computer gamer.
YankeeDan345
[QUOTE="YankeeDan345"]Horrible comparison, but to be fair I think anyone that does pay a monthly fee to play a game is a fool. Why pay $180 on one game when you could get 3 new ones that won't ruin your social life completely?It's called WoW, I used to do it for EVE, and so do over 10 million other people. For everybody who think 40$ a year for xbox live is too much LOL @ U especially if ur a computer gamer.
Jrfanfreak88
do you really think wow would ruin your social life completely? I don't like the game, but people really need to stop making assumptions on the bad apples. I have plenty of friends that play WoW and the only thing different about them is that they aren't putting the same amount of hours in counter strike as they used to.
[QUOTE="Brownesque"]Let me spell this out for you. When you pay your monthly subscription to World of Warcraft, you actually get something substantial in return....something that has to be built and maintained: dedicated servers. Blizzard has to run servers that support literally millions of subscribers. At the same time, they provide consistent updates with huge patches addressing game balance, bugs, or completely changing different aspects of the game/classes/etc. Make no mistake: WoW is expensive. It's a time and money vacuum and the game can go to hell for all I care. But at the same time I know that every time they bill me, I'm getting something actual, something physical, in return. Whereas when you pay for a year of Xbox Live, here's what you get in return. The right to play on their proprietary network (when free alternatives exist on every other platform on the market) service that operates in this way: it has literally zero infrastructure as far as hosting online matches is concerned. It relies on the players.....their internet connection, their Xbox 360's.....to host their own ******* matches. It's a revenue generating scheme that people have bought into because of the ridiculous prestige factor tied into it....period. You get INFERIOR gameplay, INFERIOR performance, and you pay them MONEY so that you can be cheated out of a superior experience on other platforms. This isn't anything to be proud of, this isn't anything to scoff at, this is something to get legitimately worked up over and complain about. Why? Because the minute you stop DOING it the minute Microsoft turns down the heat. Want an example? Take Windows Live. Windows Live is ostensibly Xbox Live for the PC platform. It's functionally identical, down to the subscription fees, so much so in fact that if you had an Xbox Live subscription, they'd let you play on Windows Live. Except for one thing....they've now removed the subscription fee. It is Xbox Live Gold minus the Xbox Live Gold fees. Why did this happen? PC gamers have a CHOICE. They have an open platform and an open network and they get to choose where they play and what they're going to pay for. Xbox Live gamers don't get this option. The only thing 360 owners or Xbox owners can do is be loud and obnoxious, because they can't simply take their business elsewhere (although my opinion is that they should, when they're choosing a console to buy). When you're playing on Xbox Live, it's sucking up bandwidth from your internet connection and forcing your Xbox 360 to do two things simultaneously...play a game from the client-side, and host the entire match from the server-side.whatisazerg
LOL.... Oh my, oh my.... got tired of making sense did we?
most of it was like that...my favorite parts were "prestige factor" and "zero infrastructure as far as hosting online matches is concerned"...i mean, he has a point about how the price will go away if people stop using it, but....millions of people use it and it keeps growing...i'm not saying that's somehow proof that the Live system is good, though...but the bulk of the argument, that there are no servers for the system and that it all depends on the internet connection of the gamers, is just wrong...What a stupid comparison, if WoW was on live you'd have to pay for WoW and for Live. WoW's a game that runs on servers with amazing support and constant content, all you pay for live is to peer 2 peer game, ripoff. And don't say ohh but all the content runs on servers bla bla, then why don't silver members pay for it?
Horrible comparison, but to be fair I think anyone that does pay a monthly fee to play a game is a fool. Why pay $180 on one game when you could get 3 new ones that won't ruin your social life completely?[QUOTE="Jrfanfreak88"][QUOTE="YankeeDan345"]
It's called WoW, I used to do it for EVE, and so do over 10 million other people. For everybody who think 40$ a year for xbox live is too much LOL @ U especially if ur a computer gamer.
_Pedro_
do you really think wow would ruin your social life completely? I don't like the game, but people really need to stop making assumptions on the bad apples. I have plenty of friends that play WoW and the only thing different about them is that they aren't putting the same amount of hours in counter strike as they used to.
ya, saying that the game itself is the reason for social ineptness is like saying that a pen is to blame for what is written with it...[QUOTE="whatisazerg"][QUOTE="Brownesque"]Let me spell this out for you. When you pay your monthly subscription to World of Warcraft, you actually get something substantial in return....something that has to be built and maintained: dedicated servers. Blizzard has to run servers that support literally millions of subscribers. At the same time, they provide consistent updates with huge patches addressing game balance, bugs, or completely changing different aspects of the game/classes/etc. Make no mistake: WoW is expensive. It's a time and money vacuum and the game can go to hell for all I care. But at the same time I know that every time they bill me, I'm getting something actual, something physical, in return. Whereas when you pay for a year of Xbox Live, here's what you get in return. The right to play on their proprietary network (when free alternatives exist on every other platform on the market) service that operates in this way: it has literally zero infrastructure as far as hosting online matches is concerned. It relies on the players.....their internet connection, their Xbox 360's.....to host their own ******* matches. It's a revenue generating scheme that people have bought into because of the ridiculous prestige factor tied into it....period. You get INFERIOR gameplay, INFERIOR performance, and you pay them MONEY so that you can be cheated out of a superior experience on other platforms. This isn't anything to be proud of, this isn't anything to scoff at, this is something to get legitimately worked up over and complain about. Why? Because the minute you stop DOING it the minute Microsoft turns down the heat. Want an example? Take Windows Live. Windows Live is ostensibly Xbox Live for the PC platform. It's functionally identical, down to the subscription fees, so much so in fact that if you had an Xbox Live subscription, they'd let you play on Windows Live. Except for one thing....they've now removed the subscription fee. It is Xbox Live Gold minus the Xbox Live Gold fees. Why did this happen? PC gamers have a CHOICE. They have an open platform and an open network and they get to choose where they play and what they're going to pay for. Xbox Live gamers don't get this option. The only thing 360 owners or Xbox owners can do is be loud and obnoxious, because they can't simply take their business elsewhere (although my opinion is that they should, when they're choosing a console to buy). When you're playing on Xbox Live, it's sucking up bandwidth from your internet connection and forcing your Xbox 360 to do two things simultaneously...play a game from the client-side, and host the entire match from the server-side.DSandPSP_owner
LOL.... Oh my, oh my.... got tired of making sense did we?
most of it was like that...my favorite parts were "prestige factor" and "zero infrastructure as far as hosting online matches is concerned"...i mean, he has a point about how the price will go away if people stop using it, but....millions of people use it and it keeps growing...i'm not saying that's somehow proof that the Live system is good, though...but the bulk of the argument, that there are no servers for the system and that it all depends on the internet connection of the gamers, is just wrong...read that red part again.... he's saying he gets something "physical" in nature for his monthly fee... funny I played WoW for 3+ years and never once did Blizzard send me anything I could hold in my hand.
Just because the wording of 'physical' is wrong, doesn't make his argument invalid at all...read that red part again.... he's saying he gets something "physical" in nature for his monthly fee... funny I played WoW for 3+ years and never once did Blizzard send me anything I could hold in my hand.
whatisazerg
[QUOTE="YankeeDan345"]Horrible comparison, but to be fair I think anyone that does pay a monthly fee to play a game is a fool. Why pay $180 on one game when you could get 3 new ones that won't ruin your social life completely? try and find 3 games that will last the entire year, playing several hours a day. I quit wow after the trial as it was pretty nutsack to me, but i can see why alot like it, it was very addictive. It's very much worth the money if you play it alot. I also think xbox live is rip off, but i want to play online therefore i have to pay.It's called WoW, I used to do it for EVE, and so do over 10 million other people. For everybody who think 40$ a year for xbox live is too much LOL @ U especially if ur a computer gamer.
Jrfanfreak88
Yes but WoW is not a fun game at all to me and there are tons of games with XBL that are. GFW is free because it's terrible and XBL is infinitely better. Also Blizzard had better not make Diablo III P2P or I'm going to explode.
Let me spell this out for you. When you pay your monthly subscription to World of Warcraft, you actually get something substantial in return....something that has to be built and maintained: dedicated servers. Blizzard has to run servers that support literally millions of subscribers. At the same time, they provide consistent updates with huge patches addressing game balance, bugs, or completely changing different aspects of the game/classes/etc. Make no mistake: WoW is expensive. It's a time and money vacuum and the game can go to hell for all I care. But at the same time I know that every time they bill me, I'm getting something actual, something physical, in return. Whereas when you pay for a year of Xbox Live, here's what you get in return. The right to play on their proprietary network (when free alternatives exist on every other platform on the market) service that operates in this way: it has literally zero infrastructure as far as hosting online matches is concerned. It relies on the players.....their internet connection, their Xbox 360's.....to host their own ******* matches. It's a revenue generating scheme that people have bought into because of the ridiculous prestige factor tied into it....period. You get INFERIOR gameplay, INFERIOR performance, and you pay them MONEY so that you can be cheated out of a superior experience on other platforms. This isn't anything to be proud of, this isn't anything to scoff at, this is something to get legitimately worked up over and complain about. Why? Because the minute you stop DOING it the minute Microsoft turns down the heat. Want an example? Take Windows Live. Windows Live is ostensibly Xbox Live for the PC platform. It's functionally identical, down to the subscription fees, so much so in fact that if you had an Xbox Live subscription, they'd let you play on Windows Live. Except for one thing....they've now removed the subscription fee. It is Xbox Live Gold minus the Xbox Live Gold fees. Why did this happen? PC gamers have a CHOICE. They have an open platform and an open network and they get to choose where they play and what they're going to pay for. Xbox Live gamers don't get this option. The only thing 360 owners or Xbox owners can do is be loud and obnoxious, because they can't simply take their business elsewhere (although my opinion is that they should, when they're choosing a console to buy). When you're playing on Xbox Live, it's sucking up bandwidth from your internet connection and forcing your Xbox 360 to do two things simultaneously...play a game from the client-side, and host the entire match from the server-side.Brownesque
You win the internet:
Wow is a lot better then xbox live. blizzard actually makes new patches for the games, fixes problems. xbox live is a peer 2 peer which equals lag. in wow if a person lags it's usually the server. i use to play wow for about 3 years. i finally got bored of the game. i was expecting this thread to be something like how u pay for to much of xbox live or something like that. i have a level 70 orc rogue. it has season 1 and 2 pvp gear.iam2greenNot all games are peer to peer and there are p2p games on PC also.
[QUOTE="iam2green"]Wow is a lot better then xbox live. blizzard actually makes new patches for the games, fixes problems. xbox live is a peer 2 peer which equals lag. in wow if a person lags it's usually the server. i use to play wow for about 3 years. i finally got bored of the game.Not all games are peer to peer and there are p2p games on PC also. of course there is... but do you solely pay for it? no you don'ti was expecting this thread to be something like how u pay for to much of xbox live or something like that. i have a level 70 orc rogue. it has season 1 and 2 pvp gear.Jamex1987
LOL @ you for making such a strange comparison. People have to pay monthly for some MMO's on Xbox 360 (take Phantasy Star Universe as an example), so what's your point? For nearly all of the games that are on both Xbox 360 and PC (excluding those stupid ones which forced you to pay for LIVE) that have multiplayer, you don't actually have to pay online on the PC to play them...It's called WoW, I used to do it for EVE, and so do over 10 million other people. For everybody who think 40$ a year for xbox live is too much LOL @ U especially if ur a computer gamer.
YankeeDan345
Not all games are peer to peer and there are p2p games on PC also. of course there is... but do you solely pay for it? no you don't DOn't you have to pay if you want a dedicated server on the PC? Cost a lot more than $50.00 a year. Rental runs from $50.00+ a month.[QUOTE="Jamex1987"][QUOTE="iam2green"]Wow is a lot better then xbox live. blizzard actually makes new patches for the games, fixes problems. xbox live is a peer 2 peer which equals lag. in wow if a person lags it's usually the server. i use to play wow for about 3 years. i finally got bored of the game.
i was expecting this thread to be something like how u pay for to much of xbox live or something like that. i have a level 70 orc rogue. it has season 1 and 2 pvp gear.swamplord666
[QUOTE="swamplord666"]of course there is... but do you solely pay for it? no you don't DOn't you have to pay if you want a dedicates server on the PC? Cost a lot more than $50.00 a year. LOL dude... edit that, maybe no one else will see :P[QUOTE="Jamex1987"] Not all games are peer to peer and there are p2p games on PC also.Jamex1987
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment